The “Abridged” (NO CRT) and Anti-Discrimination Text From HB2 in One Place – Share It, Quote it, Live It

by
Skip

Thanks for Steve in putting up the remnants of HB544 (vetoing State mandated racism) that made it into the HB2 (2021) “Trailer Bill” here. However, I found it unwieldy to read simply as there was so much repetition.

All of that of the “Protected Class” by which one cannot discriminate against age, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, race, creed, color, marital status, familial status, mental or physical disability, religion, or national origin. I’ll just call them:

<the redacted protected classes>

So with that said, here’s my abridged version to see if someone is trying to use Critical Race Theory against you and yours. Emphasis mine.

Related: The “New” (NO CRT) and Anti-Discrimination Text From HB2 in One Place – Share It, Quote it, Live It!


New Subdivision; State Commission on Human Rights; Right to Freedom From Discrimination in Public Workplaces and Education. Amend RSA 354-A by inserting after section 28 the following new subdivision:

Right to Freedom from Discrimination in Public Workplaces and Education 354-A:29

Right to Freedom from Discrimination in Public Workplaces and Education.

I. The general court hereby finds and declares that practices of discrimination against any New Hampshire inhabitants because of <the redacted characteristics classes> are a matter of state concern, that discrimination based on these characteristics not only threatens the rights and proper privileges of New Hampshire inhabitants but menaces the institutions and foundation of a free democratic state and threatens the peace, order, health, safety and general welfare of the state and its inhabitants.

II. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to prohibit racial, sexual, religious, or other workplace sensitivity training based on the inherent humanity and equality of all persons and the ideal that all persons are entitled to be treated with equality, dignity, and respect.

III. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to limit the academic freedom of faculty members of the university system of New Hampshire and the community college system of New Hampshire to conduct research, publish, lecture, or teach in the academic setting.

 

354-A:30 Definitions. In this subdivision:

I. “Government program” means any activity undertaken by a public employer, both as an employer and in performance of its government function.

II. “Public employee” means any person working on a full-time or part-time basis for the state, or any subdivision thereof, including, but not limited to counties, cities, towns, precincts, water districts, school districts, school administrative units, or quasi-public entities.

III. “Public employer” includes the state or any subdivision thereof, including, but not limited to counties, cities, towns, precincts, water districts, school districts, school administrative units, or quasi-public entities

 

354-A:31 Prohibition on Public Employers.

No public employer, either directly or through the use of an outside contractor, shall teach, advocate, instruct, or train any employee, student, service recipient, contractor, staff member, inmate, or any other individual or group, any one or more of the following:

I. That people of one <the redacted protected classes>, are inherently superior or inferior to people of another<the redacted characteristics classes>;

II. That an individual, by virtue of his or her <the redacted protected classes> is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously;

III. That an individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment solely or partly because of his or her <the redacted protected classes>; or

IV. That people of one <the redacted characteristics classes> cannot and should not attempt to treat others equally and/or without regard to <the redacted protected classes>.

 

354-A:32 Prohibition on the Content of Government Programs and Speech.

No government program shall teach, advocate, or advance any one or more of the following:

I. That people of one <the redacted protected classes> are inherently superior or inferior to people of another <the redacted protected classes>;

II. That an individual, by virtue of <the redacted characteristics>, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously;

III. That an individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment solely or partly because of <the redacted protected classes>; or

IV. That people of one <the redacted protected classes> cannot and should not attempt to treat others equally and/or without regard to <the redacted protected classes>.

 

354-A:34 Remedies. Any person aggrieved by an act made unlawful under this subdivision may pursue all of the remedies available under RSA 354-A, RSA 491, RSA 275-E, or RSA 98-E, or any other applicable common law or statutory cause of action.

 

354-A:33 Protection for Public Employees.

No public employee shall be subject to any adverse employment action, warning, or discipline of any kind for refusing to participate in any training, program, or other activity at which a public employer or government program advocates, trains, teaches, instructs, or compels participants to express belief in, or support for, any one or more of the following:

I. That people of one <the redacted characteristics> are inherently superior or inferior to people of another <the redacted protected classes>;

II. That an individual, by virtue of his or her <the redacted protected classes>, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously;

III. That an individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment solely or partly because of his or her <the redacted protected classes>; or

IV. That people of one <the redacted protected classes> cannot and should not attempt to treat others equally and/or without regard to <the redacted protected classes>

 

193:40 Prohibition on Teaching Discrimination.

I. No pupil in any public school in this state shall be taught, instructed, inculcated or compelled to express belief in, or support for, any one or more of the following:

(a) That one’s <the redacted protected classes> is inherently superior to people of another <the redacted protected classes>;

(b) That an individual, by virtue of <the redacted protected classes>, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously;

(c) That an individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment solely or partly because of <the redacted protected classes>; or

(d) That people of one <the redacted protected classes> cannot and should not attempt to treat others without regard to <the redacted protected classes>.

II. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit discussing, as part of a larger course of academic instruction, the historical existence of ideas and subjects identified in this section.

III. Any person claiming to be aggrieved by a violation of this section, including the attorney general, may initiate a civil action against a school or school district in superior court for legal or equitable relief, or with the New Hampshire Commission for human rights as provided in RSA 354- A:34.

IV. Violation of this section by an educator shall be considered a violation of the educator code of conduct that justifies disciplinary sanction by the state board of education.

V. For the purposes of this section, “educator” means a professional employee of any school district whose position requires certification by the state board pursuant to RSA 189:39. Administrators, specialists, and teachers are included within the definition of this term. 299 Severability. If any provision of sections 297-298, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, the remainder of such sections, and their application to any other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

 

Author

  • Skip

    Co-founder of GraniteGrok, my concern is around Individual Liberty and Freedom and how the Government is taking that away. As an evangelical Christian and Conservative with small "L" libertarian leanings, my fight is with Progressives forcing a collectivized, secular humanistic future upon us. As a TEA Party activist, citizen journalist, and pundit!, my goal is to use the New Media to advance the radical notions of America's Founders back into our culture.

Share to...