Anyone remember this “folksy” tweet trying to get people to not take Ivermectin because it was for farm animals? Horse dewormer and all, and definitely not-not-not for use in human beings, evah?
So now is the time where we JUXTAPOSE.
Look here, Immigrant, Refugee, and Migrant Health, (and CDC, I’ve screenshotted this, PDFed it, and got it so emailed out and distributed you’ll never disappear it). Here’s the intro (note the website URL at the top which I’ve circled):
And the key section, Intestinal Parasite Guidance (no circling, it’s obvious):
According to a search – screenshot below – Ivermectin is mentioned 47 times (funny how they mention something that many times for PEOPLE coming to the US if it’s not meant for PEOPLE, no?):
In their downloadable / printable PDF, Ivermectin is mentioned 43 times:
Government, meet government. It’s a good thing these people don’t cross-check their stories with each other. ?
Screencap these yourself. I have no doubt that once they see traffic to this page they’ll memory hole this. But for those with a sense of curiosity… why would the government (CDC & FDA) be so dead-set against an off-label use of Ivermectin when it has such clear results?
IVERMECTIN RESULTS
Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA technology, did this interview (video, about 8 minutes):
There’s An Alternative And Ethical Strategy To The Jab
Results from Indonesia are astounding:
And Japan:
Africa weighs in with results:
As has India:
With more here. And you must see here.
DRIVING A NEEDLE INTO EVERY ARM
Here’s an article on the lengths the globalists will go to smear anyone who discusses Ivermectin in a positive light; Wikipedia and a pint of gin (bolding added):
What is truly troubling is that the Wikipedia editor considers this type of “fact check” by a non-physician a reliable source. What is even more troubling is that Wikipedia DOES NOT CONSIDER the American Journal of Therapeutics a reliable source. Their editors REFUSED to allow even the mention of Dr. Kory’s recent publication or Dr. Tess Lawrie’s recent publication in the same journal.
The article goes on. There is a remarkable lack of curiosity about anything that doesn’t benefit The Narrative to drive a needle into every arm. Or pharma money into FDA & CDC officials’ pockets (link in original, bolding added):
Perhaps they are trying to figure out how to deal with the breaking news that one of their members accepted $437,250 from two vaccine manufacturers in violation of federal conflict of interest rules. Is he in debt? Does he have a gambling problem? Is he an addict? Who knows. What we do know is that he’s willing to sell all of America’s children to Pharma for $437,250.
Yes, I know, there’s only one example quantified. But… here. And a video here (35 minutes). Plus, meet the FDA panel and observe their sordid dirty laundry.
So why a needle into every arm? It’s the 7.3 billion person question. Which they’re open about (video from an earlier piece of mine):
Profits… and depopulation.
One other great interview, see this interview with Dr. Vladimir Zelenko (video, 54-odd minutes). Note what he says – that 600,000 of the 700,000 “deaths with from covid” could probably have been prevented by HCQ and other early treatments.
CLOSING
A few quick-hit links to close:
MALCOLM: Let’s look at the actual numbers about kids and COVID
One-Third Of New Drugs Had Safety Problems After FDA Approval
And concluding, from the Grok:
Based on Pfizer’s Own Data, Kids 5-11 Don’t Need Their “Vaccine”
Remember, off-patent medications that can be made by anyone don’t bump up the bottom line.
And I have a cartoon about this planned, with the cartoonist enthusiastic to get to it, as soon as I pay him for the last one which I had done but haven’t put up here yet. Stay tuned!
>>>>>=====<<<<<
LET’S GO BRANDON!