To the Left, "Tolerance" is Defined as YOUR Capacity to Endure Political Pain or Hardship - Granite Grok

To the Left, “Tolerance” is Defined as YOUR Capacity to Endure Political Pain or Hardship

Tolerance

The unity messages that seep from the wounds inflicted by the left have a partner in crime. Tolerance. They want you to believe that tolerance is about embracing different things, but they’ve left something out.

The left is, as an amalgam, are fragile, angry beasts easily triggered and wholly lacking “sympathy or indulgence for beliefs or practices differing from or conflicting with one’s own.”

For them, Tolerance is the capacity of YOUR body to endure or become less responsive to a substance or a physiological insult, especially with repeated use or exposure. YOUR capacity to endure pain or hardship and the end of their policy stick.

As defined, tolerance is a two-way street, but in the utopia of the Democrat party, the street only goes one way. We’ve got plenty of local examples, but when it’s one of theirs, it’s much more enlightening.

JK Rowling is a woke billionaire. She is very supportive of the gender spectrum, but she objects to biological men’s unfettered access to women’s private spaces.

 

“Dress however you please. Call yourself whatever you like. Sleep with any consenting adult who’ll have you. Live your best life in peace and security. But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real?”

 

And we agree on all counts. But – as we’ve often noted – if you do not accept the Left’s entire agenda without question, the tolerant libs will turn on you as they have upon JK Rowling.

 

“Yes but now [that] hundreds of trans activists have threatened to beat, rape, assassinate and bomb me, I’ve realised that this movement poses no risk to women whatsoever.”

 

 

Rowling, who is still a flaming liberal and supports liberal causes, has discovered that this was never enough for the political left. Being a woman is no longer enough, but has she discovered that it is more than that?

That the political left doesn’t give a damn about the Trans either.

The Democrat party is a parasite. It hitches a ride and feeds off the host to get what it wants. But it’s always looking for a better free ride, and if it finds one and that means killing off a previous host, so be it.

The plight of JK Rowling, women athletes, moms, daughters, and the men who want to protect them is just one example, but we’ve more recent and more destructive fare.

Black Lives Matter may have ruined more black lives in the past year than decades of so-called systemic abuse by police officers – another constituency the left abandoned out of convenience. And these were the lives of black Americans who were majority life-long democrats.

And now it’s the entire white race in America, complete with democrat armies of white enablers (many of them women) who think that this is the issue that will take them to the progressive’s promised land.

If it is, I have some terrible news for you. Once the left is certain of its hold on power, you may no longer be of any use.

And before you rewrite history, you might want to review what that looks like before it’s too late. A world where para-military groups like Antifa can practice political street justice because it furthers the left’s agenda.

We’re there now. You’ve just proven yourself to be useful for the moment. At some point, this all becomes a legitimate exercise sanctioned by the ruling class. Dissent of any sort becomes insurrection or treason.

Where policy (let’s say, public health policy, for example) is weaponized not just to control people but to identify “dissidents” with the help of corporatist mass or social media titans.

JK Rowling’s had a taste of what that might look like, but she can, of course, afford private security. Whatever becomes of the world she enabled, Ms. Rowling could easily retire comfortably into silence and live out her life in anonymity without fear of reprisal. Assuming she keeps her mouth shut.

Not so for the rest of us, including the BLM and Antifa rats, or the rank-and-file Dems who thought they were fighting for sympathy when in fact, they were the vanguard of their own political pain and hardship.

>