The feminization of humanity has reached crisis proportions. Men will be replacing women on their sports teams and, if Erin Brokovitch is to be believed, will no longer be able to make babies by 2045 no matter to what gender they aspire.
ICYMI: Problem or Consequence?
What is Planned Parenthood doing about this? Without sperm, there can be no “accidental” pregnancies or girls, and women stuck with babies. If there are no babies, PP’s business model collapses.
And according to this, we are a few decades from not needing them for anything.
A new book called Countdown, by Shanna Swan, an environmental and reproductive epidemiologist at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, finds that sperm counts have dropped almost 60% since 1973. Following the trajectory we are on, Swan’s research suggests sperm counts could reach zero by 2045. Zero. Let that sink in. That would mean no babies. No reproduction. No more humans. Forgive me for asking: why isn’t the UN calling an emergency meeting on this right now?
Yes, because the UN could fix it? The UN Couldn’t make a sandwich unless it were the crap-filled variety, and the plan was to feed it to Isreal or the US.
On a paper plate, please because Erin is pointing a finger at drinking straws and food wrappers and, well,
…chemicals…found in everything from plastic containers and food wrapping to waterproof clothes and fragrances in cleaning products, to soaps and shampoos, to electronics and carpeting. Some of them, called PFAS, are known as “forever chemicals” because they don’t breakdown in the environment or the human body.
Maybe and no. There is no scientific evidence to suggest anything she claims here is correct, not even PFAS‘ as forever chemicals. That does not mean they might not be, but there is no proof other than that saying it often scares people, which advances a partisan agenda.
Not that it matters. If Erin is truly concerned, the UN is not her hero.
The major polluters in the categories she pretends “concern her” are India and China, with a handful of African nations riding side-car. Nations without any obvious sperm-count issues on the UN’s list of places that are not the United States.
And maybe Erin missed it, but the UN does very little to address Environmental anything in these places. They are massive polluters, emitters, and dumpers of waste she suggests are harpooning the sperm count and the environment.
The UN does nothing because that’s not why it exists or what its “environmental interests are about. The environment is just a means to an end. A mule to convert the world economy away from free-market capitalism.
But if it’s that important to her, perhaps Ms. Brokovitch can start lobbying to end solar panel production. Those things are terrible for the environment and are connected to gobs of environmental poisons, including known carcinogens. All of which is moot.
According to Democrats, the world will have ended long before the sperm count hits zero but assuming they are not lying (just for fun, they are), why not try this instead.
You could stop killing babies conceived by people who can clearly still get the job done.
