Capitol “Rioter” Admits to Being BLM Anti-Trump Activist

by
Steve MacDonald

Left-Wing Narratives are all about absolutes. All Trump supporters are Klansman or Nazis. Kill the rich. And every protester at the Capitol needs to go to jail. Even this guy? John Earle Sullivan, a BLM supporter and founder of Insurgence USA.


Get ‘Groked on  Parler  –  MeWe  –  Minds  –  Gab –  Twitter  –  Codias.


After the crowd broke through the last barricade, and as SULLIVAN and the others approach the Capitol Building, SULLIVAN can be heard in the video saying at various points: ‘There are so many people. Let’s go. This s— is ours! F— yeah,’ ‘We accomplished this s—. We did this together. F— yeah! We are all a part of this history,’ and ‘Let’s burn this s— down.

Having been accused of inciting violence and doxxing public officials for publishing voting records and making fun of stupid Democrat tweets, I feel obligated to note that Sullivan’s “words” sound like actual incitement to violence.

Give that the same people have tried to pass legislation to suppress what is protected, can we agree that Sullivan’s “speech” is not protected by the First Amendment?

Probably not, and that is why we’ll never have unity, not that this was ever anything but Newspeak from the Left.

Extremists in religions like Islam and Leftism (Socialism, Marxism, Syndicalism, Fascism/Corporatism, Post Modernism, etc.) agree that there is no law you cannot bend or break in pursuit of the greater “good.” All is forgiven if your actions are motivated by a desire to expand the power and reach of your master.

You may even get an award, parade, book deal, or your cable news program.

John Earle Sullivan was not there alone. We know that thousands of infiltrators attended the rally, and many lead the charge to breach the US Capitol. It was their enthusiasm that incited the violence by all involved.

Sullivan did not breach the Capitol. He leads a charge. Using the rules of the left, we should claim that all BLM supporters are like him. That they are complicit in all the fires, assaults, and arson that occurred during their mostly peaceful protests.

Their speech should be suppressed; they themselves made unemployable, blacklisted, de-platformed and canceled.

No exceptions for the party, faith, or politics, but that’s not how the supremacy classists work.

For the record, as with every such example during both the Obama and Trump presidencies, we’ve stood firm on the rule of law. Break it, you get arrested, charged, the evidence is presented, and you pay your fine or do your time if you are guilty.

In all other cases, you are entitled to the same natural right to speech and assembly (protected by the US Constitution) as anyone else.

As an organization, BLM is not interested in black lives except as a vehicle to advance their version of Marxism. But not everyone who marches with them supports that. And free speech invites engaging in that debate.

The left, including BLM, do not want s to have that debate. Nor does Antifa, or the LEt in general. And that’s the problem.

The Right embraces free speech but does not condone attack as a means to an end. It is not an allowable form of protest.

Leftism cannot advance its agenda without violence or criminality, either in violation of the law or disguised by it—violence as a tool to silence dissent.

It is who they are, and it is how they rule. It has already become a feature of their majority and the next Presidency.


Support Free Speech – Please Make a one-time or Monthly Donation to GraniteGrok Today


Author

  • Steve MacDonald

    Steve is a long-time New Hampshire resident, blogger, and a member of the Board of directors of The 603 Alliance. He is the owner of Grok Media LLC and the Managing Editor of GraniteGrok.com, a former board member of the Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire, and a past contributor to the Franklin Center for Public Policy.

Share to...