Democrat legislators in NH and other states are coming up with all kinds of crazy carbon tax plans along with bills that could potentially give tyrannical powers, in the hope of controlling “greenhouse gas” output. These bills are destructive to the free and unbiased practice of science by codifying a revenue stream that is reliant on a theory having a specific outcome, thereby corrupting the scientific method.
If these bills or any bills like them pass, they will have a destructive effect on science and governance, and it’s free practice for generations. The science is already corrupted by a few fear-mongering government scientists manipulating the narrative, the funding, and the scientific review process. We are already at a point where multiple billion-dollar businesses rely on this theory being correct and have zero interest in finding out the truth.
What these scientists promoting catastrophic global warming are doing is no longer science, it’s more akin to astrology. They have either forgotten, don’t care, or never understood that the Ph.D. they received stands for Doctor of Philosophy. Most of them are epistemologically challenged and have a problem with the philosophy of science.
Philosopher Karl Popper, set the bar for science, in that, if a theory is not falsifiable, it is not science. It must be testable. The catastrophic global warming theory has no formula that produces a definitive outcome. The theory has not made any correct scientific predictions, thereby failing science’s most crucial test.
As an aside, Karl Popper, who was a mentor of billionaire and climate fear monger George Soros, would be extremely disappointed in his pupil if he were alive today. Control, power, money, and ideology are the drivers for Soros and his cronies.
There is no conclusive evidence for catastrophic global warming. A serious review of climate science shows it is fraught with contradictions, doublespeak, cherry-picked, manipulated data, shuffled facts, all force-fed into computer models. What there is evidence for is a massive miscalculation.
This evidence comes from NASA itself. Over 32 years ago, then NASA scientist, James Hansen, started climate fear-mongering using the planet Venus as a proxy for Earth with increased CO2. Venus’s atmosphere at its surface is 90 times denser than Earth’s, is 96% carbon dioxide and extremely hot. This comparison has proven to be quite dubious when considering NASA’s own plans to colonize other planets including Venus.
NASA scientists say, Venus can be colonized in floating vessels 50 kilometers up in the atmosphere, where the “atmospheric density” and “temperature” correspond to Earth at sea level! How can this be, with Venus’ 96% CO2 vs Earth’s minuscule fraction of a percent CO2?
This reveals nothing less than a major flaw and miscalculation or straight-up fraud on the part of the alarmists.
President Eisenhower in his Farewell Address warned:
“The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”
BY Julius F. Soti