The Benefits and Setbacks Associated with Political Parties - Granite Grok

The Benefits and Setbacks Associated with Political Parties

This refers to groupings of individuals working together by sharing a mutual ambition, vision, and goals for their respective communities. The associations could be formed nationally, regionally, or at local levels, meeting habitually, creating platforms representing their specific values and vision. Furthermore, they send their members or representatives to vie for political seats.

The prime benefit offered by political sets is organization. With the availability of these groupings, all members of the society who vote are able to evaluate politics across different levels. As such, they can ascertain if they uphold similar values. Similarly, it gives a platform for distinguished contestants to exemplify unique ideas and sets of values for running for office.

The key disadvantage of these politically motivated groupings is a compromise. Generally, most parties are controlled by teams of executives or directors who are charged with directing or influencing the platform of the group. Anyone who wishes to join the party is then required to agree with this platform whether or not it fits their aspirations or needs. Consequently, they end up compromising leadership.

Here are more pros and cons of political parties that you may consider.

Advantages of Political Affiliations

These groups could benefit society significantly.

  • Public participation is encouraged – When they adopt a representative government arrangement, political organizations can make the average citizen active in the political sense. They will ensure that the people are informed of societal happenings, enabling them to choose a position on the issues. Furthermore, through debates, people can share views or articulate their opinions.
  • They enable accountability – Countries that host a pair of rival parties, for instance, have systems that unify the politicians to facilitate negotiations on legislation. Those with multiple associations, on the other hand, consult over leadership to come up with majority governments. These two government structures encourage accountability while preventing the group or individual from seizing excess supremacy.
  • They enable even distribution of information – Most elections rely on these groupings for information on any current or future legislation. The general population gets the opportunity to work with their leaders in crafting visions for tomorrow. Through these assimilations, voters can pressurize their leaders to keep their promises in a representative government setup. Just like in top essay writing reviews, they can vet their performance to decide whether to re-elect them.
  • They dilute any special interest projects – Without these active political associations, the richest individuals would definitely influence the community ending up as winners in elections. Parties, however, allow those who share common values to work together in countering such influences. Special interests may still have a role, but these associations enable voters to band together, countering any financial influence.
  • Faster decision-making – Current political situations in different countries may seem to slow the decision-making process. But when like-minded politicians to collaborate within set boundaries, it gets easier to share strategies and concepts that are beneficial to the entire country. This, however, requires a well-managed group to enjoy these benefits.
  • Creating connections – Naturally, you will be attracted to those whom you share common notions and visions. This would allow members of a particular affiliation to work together and create connections that would have been impossible to achieve. Not only does it lead to new friends, but members also enjoy traveling to new locations and working in unison to better society.

Detriments of Political Parties

These groupings also have different setbacks. Here are the crucial ones:

  • They may be abusive – Not all countries adopt a representative form of governance. Both dictatorships and communism use political groupings to enforce beliefs and decrees as opposed to staying active in the political sense. Parties with excess leverage or power in any country can end up being abusive instead.
  • They encourage polarization – While they may be used to unite people, these formations may as well tear people apart. Each of them offers platforms that continue to present themselves as all-or-nothing scenarios. Furthermore, the kind of ‘righteousness’ attached to the particular platforms would make anyone disagreeing with it seem on the wrong.
  • They sacrifice individuality – Personal views are equally crucial since people learn and grow based on their individual experiences. Political groupings, however, have a structure that drowns individual voices. Provided their voices are loud enough, a lesser section of the party could head the other team members towards new directions. This means that apprehensive distinct voices get little or no attention, failing to enjoy the benefits.

These benefits and hindrances show why political affiliations need to be well managed, organized, and open-minded for all sections of society to benefit. While the affiliations may lead to polarization and disunity, it is a good approach for like-minded individuals to work together, learning new things in the process.


From time to time, GraniteGrok accepts content from third parties (posts, or additional links after initial publication) from which we may or may not receive compensation.