(Image H/T: BizJournals)
UPDATE: The copyright owner, Demetria Miles-McDonald (given the intersectionality, I dunno if it is Ms, Mrs., Miss, Zir, They, or some other pronoun or modifier), sent a Cease and Desist order for the table that formerly occupied this space. That’s part of the problem with this notion of everything blobs into everything else with this.
Then there’s the Third Wave Feminist ideology of you can be oppressed several ways to Sunday. All the more to whack the Normals over the head as one granulates each and every identity group to which you might think you belong. (Like a polyamorous 20-year-old Chinese lesbian who identifies as a Native American trans-6-year-old boy with leanings of a Furry; you get the idea.)
Gee, other than my original target to ridicule, that chart was only a prop (as it is here to her narrative), I thought I was doing her a favor by promoting her work and letting it explain exactly how many oppressed groups one can be a part of at once because it has to be seen and studied to be believed. The epitome of the anti-E-Pluribus-Unum because by the time you’re done, you have no idea to what you belong to and it is all blamed on ‘Murica.
So, go here, look at the table (go quick because with the Progressive bent for declaring “This is Truth” and a couple of weeks later circling back and then stating “No, THIS NEW thing is Truth and that other thing is now BAD”, it may be out of date), come on back and read the rest. And I’ll be blogging more about this later on.
Original Post
And why is this even newsworthy? Is this just yet another example of why folks on the Right roll their eyes and go “really?” because we don’t generally care what you look like. But Democrats are judging your looks every second of every day – how’s it feel to be objectified simply for political reasons?
NH Primary Source: Election boosts diversity in Democratic NH House caucus
First African-American Granite Stater elected to state Senate
20 LAWMAKERS OF DIVERSE BACKGROUNDS. The 234-member House Democratic majority caucus has 19 members who either have minority backgrounds or are members of the LGBT community.
Like I’ve said before, I don’t care if you are black, white, red, yellow, brown, or green with blue polka dots – what matters is if you love your family, pay your taxes, be nice, as a software engineer – does your code work and is it elegant and most importantly, what do you think and believe? It is that latter part that truly is important. THAT’s the source of true diversity and not just what you look like when you look into a mirror. However, that’s all the Left seems to care about – what group do you belong to? They don’t see the individual, the person; it is all about the Collective and identity groups that go along with it. Society – just clumps of groups. The groups exist only to move the Democrat agenda. Doubt me? Look how fast Christine Blasey Ford has disappeared from the scene – her political usefulness gone, so is she; just a cog in the machine and once deemed unusable, gone.
In addition, state Rep. Melanie Levesque will be the first African-American member of the state Senate. New LGBT members of the House are Joyce Weston of Plymouth, Garrett Muscatel of Hanover, Sue Mullen of Bedford, Josh Query of Manchester, Lisa Bunker of Exeter, Gerri Cannon of Somersworth and Andrew O’Hearne of Claremont. They join re-elected incumbents Ed Butler of Hart’s Location, Henry Parkhurst of Winchester, Jim MacKay of Concord and Linda Tanner of Sunapee.
New members with minority backgrounds are Julie Radhakrishnan of Amherst, Manny Espitia and Linda Harriott-Gathright of Nashua, Richard Komi of Manchester and Safiya Wazir of Concord. They join incumbents Jean Jeudy of Manchester, Lath Mangipud of Nashua and Charlotte DiLorenzo of Newmarket.
“Over the years we have called the House ‘The People’s House,’ but now it will truly reflect the great diverse communities of New Hampshire,” said state Democratic Party Chairman Raymond Buckley. “I could not be prouder of these amazing leaders.”
And they all will vote lockstep Democrat / Socialist. Diversity in that? From that aspect, will there be any differences? I doubt it – really doubt it. They will all be voting Collectivist thoughts – more government, hate business, love taxes, and take choices away from us, the Individuals. They will show, in doing so, that for all of their fluffy bubblegum and moderate campaign rhetoric, the masks will slide off. We’ll see 2006 (minus the Governorship) all over again.
The only question will be what issue they DIDN’T campaign on will come to the fore – fast, furious, and costly? It’s what they do and they do it with no remorse and without to any thought to what they yammer about when Rs are in power – settled law. They just won’t care and they’ll all pile on like political lemmings – it’s what they do and it’s what they are.
We’ll have to track these folks and see how they turn out – will that diversity turn out to be truly just skin deep but ideologically über alles?
(H/T: WMUR)
