This at the UL caught my eye with the title of Dave Solomon’s Power Plays: NH joins energy community rights network (emphasis mine, reformatted):
She says the idea of the Community Rights movement is not to eliminate state or federal authority to site needed energy, transportation or water projects if they are publicly sponsored and deemed necessary in the public interest by elected representatives. “We are not looking to override all preemption of local authority,” she said. “We understand that preemption is necessary for the public good when it is protecting public rights.”
But when corporations propose projects that have not met the test of public necessity, local control should prevail, she says. A new highway, a water reservoir or an electric reliability project are different from corporate-sponsored projects like Northern Pass or the Northeast Energy Direct pipeline, according to Sanborn.
Yes, this is the group that has been sponsoring a number of warrant articles (here in NH, people or local boards can present items to be voted upon at either Town Meeting or ballot voting) that have tried to literally override the idea that towns and cities are mere sub-divisions of the State and can override statutes if the townfolk decide that is appropriate. Now,


