First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
I like how the Cornell Law School interprets the First in current phrasing: “It guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely. ”
NH Constitution [Free Speech; Liberty of the Press.] Free speech and liberty of the press are essential to the security of freedom in a state: They ought, therefore, to be inviolably preserved.
So, as Steve alluded to, who were the sponsors of SB466 that was a brazen attempt at silencing politicians to whom they disagreed and weaponized their own political positions to do so (reformatted)?









