
Our friend Karen Testerman at Cornerstone Policy Research sends the following sad news about opportunity lost here in the Granite State:
New state-by-state survey ranks, grades states by the success
of their anti-poverty efforts and by the reform policies they adopted
When President Bill Clinton signed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, he gave the states unprecedented flexibility in implementing welfare reform.
Elected officials and human services professionals in California, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Maryland, and Virginia most successfully seized the opportunities provided by the new law, developing thoughtful reform policies and integrating services needed to help millions of former welfare recipients move into the workplace.
But New Hampshire was less ambitious, failing to take advantage of opportunities available to improve effectiveness at the state level.
Welfare Reform After Ten Years: A State-by-State Analysis, released by the nonprofit, nonpartisan Heartland Institute, ranks the 50 states and the District of Columbia, grading them by the success of their anti-poverty efforts and by the reform policies they adopted.
New Hampshire earned a grade of F, as did Colorado, Kansas, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
The state trimmed its welfare rolls between 1996 and 2006 by just 43 percent, while the national average of all states fell by 68 percent, to 4.1 million recipients from 12.2 million.
Overall, New Hampshire posted the fourth-worst effort at reform in the nation. It ranked near the bottom for results (49th) and for its reform policies (39th).