Tax-free NH. Well, not really…

    If you got it, they’ll tax it… . The following press release was issued yesterday afternoon by the NH House Republican Office. Can you imagine if this was the GOP that had decided to tax milk? I’ll bet the Dems and their comrades in the statewide newsmedia would have had a cow… NH Democrats Continue to … Read more

What about the Fair Tax? GraniteGrok asked Sen Lindsay Graham…

Today on our radio show, Meet the New Press, we interviewed David Burton of the Americans for Fair Taxation group. When properly explained with enough detail, The "Fair Tax" seems to make a great deal of sense. In a few words– it replaces all federal taxes with a national sales tax at the end sale … Read more

The gathering storm…

Is anybody out there considering the result of increasing the size of NH’s traditionally frugal state government by a whopping 16%? Where does it end? What happens in an economic downturn? I can’t believe I’m pining for the days of an 11% Shaheen budget. Once we giveth, it is impossible to taketh away. Unfortunately, by … Read more

Taxation by a thousand cuts…

In his "State House Dome" column found in today’s New Hampshire Sunday News (Union Leader), Tom Fahey writes about some new taxes being raised (foisted) upon certain NH persons and businesses. "But wait, Doug. Don’t we live in ‘tax-free’ New Hampshire?" Oh, sure. While it’s true we don’t (yet) have an official broad-based tax, we … Read more

US taxpayers get rare piece of good news…

Regular readers might recall that some time back, I posted a lengthy piece (What, me worry? For some Republicans, it’s business as usual.) about how many Republicans, fresh off a stinging electoral defeat, didn’t understand why. It was (and still is) my contention that their big spending ways were a major cause. I wrote Missteps. Corruption. … Read more

Another life lesson: taxes, baseball tickets, and Democratic economics.

At first I was going to post this under the "humor" category. But when I read it again, I realized that it really isn’t funny at all. It’s downright sad. Perhaps you’ve seen this already– it seems like the sort of thing that’s probably on its umpteenth trip throughout the Internet. No matter. It’s worth … Read more

Tax Evader a no-show at court… and on the radio.

For those of you wondering where our previously announced radio interview with convicted tax-evader Ed Brown ended up, you can stop looking. Despite speaking with one of his comrades "holed up" at the mountaintop "compound" several times prior to air time, when it came time for the interview, they never answered the phone. I guess … Read more

And the Democrats are speaking about raising taxes – how about getting rid of some?

THIS LITTLE TAX DITTY WAS SENT IN BY AN OLD CLASSMATE.  I WOULD LIKE TO ADD ONE CORRECTION. AT THE END OF THE MESSAGE, IT SAYS "NOT ONE OF THESE TAXES EXISTED 100 YEARS AGO . . .". ACTUALLY, THE TELEPHONE FEDERAL EXCISE TAX GOES BACK TO THE SPANISH AMERICAN WAR. THE TAX WAS INSTITUTED TO HELP PAY FOR THAT WAR — IT WAS ENACTED ON JUNE 13, 1898.

What Happened?
At first I thought this was funny…then I realized the awful truth of it. Be sure to read all the way to the end!

Tax his land,
Tax his bed,
Tax the table
At which he’s fed.

Tax his tractor,
Tax his mule,
Teach him taxes
Are the rule.

Tax his cow,
Tax his goat,
Tax his pants,
Tax his coat.

Tax his ties,
Tax his shirt,
Tax his work,
Tax his dirt.

Tax his tobacco,
Tax his drink,
Tax him if he
Tries to think.

Tax his cigars,
Tax his beers,
If he cries, then
Tax his tears.

Tax his car,
Tax his gas,
Find other ways
To tax his ass

Tax all he has
Then let him know
That you won’t be done
Till he has no dough.

Read more

CAGW celebrates “Festivus”. Airing of Grievances and Feats of Strength.

The gang over at Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) has announced that they are celebrating "Festivus" once again this year…
(Washington, D.C.) – Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) today marked its third annual celebration of Festivus to acknowledge the disappointments and successes for taxpayers in 2006.  In the sitcom Seinfeld, Festivus is a fictional holiday invented by Frank Costanza to protest the commercialization of other December holidays.  The Festivus dinner begins with the Airing of Grievances, where the celebrant tells family and friends all the ways they have disappointed him or her over the past year.  Similarly, CAGW will now tell politicians all they ways they have disappointed taxpayers over the past year.  Festivus is not considered over until the head of the family has been pinned by another participant in the Feats of Strength.  Likewise, CAGW will end Festivus by recognizing the times taxpayers triumphed over Washington’s big spenders.
The Airing of Grievances
Pork:  CAGW’s 2006 Congressional Pig Book identified 9,963 pork projects costing a record $29 billion in the 11 fiscal 2006 appropriations bills, including $1,000,000 for the Waterfree Urinal Conservation Initiative and $500,000 for the Sparta Teapot Museum in Sparta, N.C.  Former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham (R-Calif) is serving an eight-year jail sentence for taking $2.4 million in bribes in exchange for earmarks.  Other members of Congress are being investigated for allegedly profiting from earmarks and for directing earmarks to campaign contributors, including outgoing House Appropriations Committee Chairman Jerry Lewis (R-Calif.) and incoming subcommittee chairman Alan Mollohan (D-W.Va.).  In the face of these scandals and abuses, the 109th Congress failed to enact substantial earmark reform and later rejected a bill to require defense earmarks to be reviewed and graded.
"Water-free urinal initiative"? And you thought all your tax dollars were being wasted… you know– flushed down the drain. The CAGW announcement continues:

Read more

New Hampshire- The NEW New Jersey?

Ed Naile sends another fantastic piece in which he studies the rise and explosion of out of control government, New Jersey style. New Hampshire, could this be your future?

by Ed Naile

Yes, a lot of the soccer moms and portfolio voters you saw at the polls Tuesday were from out of state originally.

You know the ones I am talking about – pony tail, baseball type cap that says Martha’s Vinyard on it or some such thing, driving a Volvo wagon. Its almost like a uni-sex uniform.

Well these "angry at Bush," "anti-war," but don’t really want to get blown up at Starbucks voters just handed New Hampshire progressives a perfect two year storm.

Here is the Education Funding lawsuit time frame from where these "property value" voters came from.

Does it look like Claremont so far?

Feb. 1970 A lawsuit, Robinson v. Cahill, brought on behalf of urban school children, charges the state’s system for funding schools discriminates against poorer districts in a equity suit.

Apr. 1973 The New Jersey Supreme Court rules that heavy reliance on property taxes for education discriminates against poor districts

Jul. 1975 The Public School Education Act, Chapter 212, creates a new state-funding formula for public schools, but lawmakers do not raise taxes to pay for it.

 

Jul. 1976 The NJ Supreme Court shuts down the public schools for eight days because the Legislature failed to fund the new formula.

July 1976 The first New Jersey state income tax is then enacted!!! (2% now topped out at 7%)

Read more

The Forgotten Story: It’s the Economy, Stupid!

In this week’s radio address, President Bush talks about the economy. It is no secret that the economy is humming along at a pretty good clip at the moment and jobs are generally available to those who want to work. Additionally, opportunities abound for those with the entrepreneurial drive to make it on their own. All in all, for many people, these are good times. Funny though, we don’t hear much about any of this from the mainstream media these days. That’s because any good news might reflect kindly on the President, and of course, we couldn’t have that now, could we? If Clinton were the President, that’s all we’d be hearing 24/7- you know, the great "Clinton economy."
.
While I believe that it’s the people themselves that actually make this great economy work, there are actions engaged in by the federal government that can help it or hurt it. Luckily for us, President Bush’s policies are more about helping it by getting government out of the way of the forward motion of our industrious spirit. Oh- and these policies allow more of us to keep a larger portion of the fruits of our labor by paying less in taxes. On this, President Bush is spot-on. The President explains:
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. Election Day is around the corner, and one of the biggest issues at stake in this campaign is your taxes. Here is my philosophy: I believe that our economy grows and the American Dream reaches more citizens when you keep more of what you earn. With more money in your pocket, it is easier for families to afford a good education, it is easier for young people to afford the down payment on a home of their own, and it’s easier for small business owners to go out and invest and create jobs.
Amen! While President Bush isn’t much of a conservative when it comes to the size of government and how his administration prepares the budget, his aforementioned "philosophy" should be music to every conservative’s (and ordinary working American’s, for that matter) ears. But alas, we don’t hear it much these days, as the mainstream media focuses on all that they can to make Bush and the Republicans look bad. The President continues, explaining what’s been done to let us keep more of our hard-earned paychecks:
So my administration and the Republican Congress enacted the largest tax relief since Ronald Reagan was in the White House. We cut taxes for every American who pays income taxes. We doubled the child tax credit. We reduced the marriage penalty. We cut taxes on small business. We cut taxes on capital gains and dividends to promote investment and jobs. And to reward family businesses and farmers for a lifetime of hard work and savings, we put the death tax on the path to extinction.
.
Now the results of these tax cuts are in. The tax cuts we passed have left more than a trillion dollars in the hands of American workers, families, and small businesses, and you have used that money to fuel a strong and growing economy. Last year, our economy grew faster than any other major industrialized nation. This week, we learned that our economy grew by 1.6 percent during the third quarter of this year. As we expected, this rate is slower than in previous quarters. Yet the evidence still points to a vibrant economy that is providing more jobs and better wages for our workers and helping reduce the federal deficit.
.
So my administration and the Republican Congress enacted the largest tax relief since Ronald Reagan was in the White House. We cut taxes for every American who pays income taxes. We doubled the child tax credit. We reduced the marriage penalty. We cut taxes on small business. We cut taxes on capital gains and dividends to promote investment and jobs. And to reward family businesses and farmers for a lifetime of hard work and savings, we put the death tax on the path to extinction.
.
Now the results of these tax cuts are in. The tax cuts we passed have left more than a trillion dollars in the hands of American workers, families, and small businesses, and you have used that money to fuel a strong and growing economy. Last year, our economy grew faster than any other major industrialized nation. This week, we learned that our economy grew by 1.6 percent during the third quarter of this year. As we expected, this rate is slower than in previous quarters. Yet the evidence still points to a vibrant economy that is providing more jobs and better wages for our workers and helping reduce the federal deficit.
Ah, the deficit- did you know it’s been halved from where it stood several years back? Many people probably don’t, because the mainstream media doesn’t seem to care as much when it goes down as it does when it goes up (and a Republican occupies the White House).

Read more

“Useful Idiots” by Ed Mosca

Our friend Bill A. in Dover forwards attorney Ed Mosca’s latest piece on the education funding boondoggle here in NH. Big spending government types and their liberal adherants can’t stand that NH has the smallest state tax-take in the entire USA. Low taxes = small government. Proponents of a so-called "broadbased" tax (i.e. income, sales) have taken their quest to the unelected judges, naturally. As usual, Ed really nails it:

Useful Idiots by Ed Mosca

Lenin is credited with coining the term “useful idiots,” which he supposedly used to refer to supporters of the Soviet Union living in Western democracies.  They were idiots because they unwittingly were supporting a cause that would destroy the freedoms and prosperity they enjoyed under democratic governments.  When it comes to education funding, the term fits those candidates running for State office who want to define an adequate education “so the Supreme Court doesn’t do it for us.” 
.
Obviously, their line of thinking is predicated on the notion that, if only the Legislature and Governor “finally” were to define an adequate education, the Court would then defer to this definition and the corresponding determination of the cost.  A brief history lesson is in order because, as the saying goes, those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it.   
.
The Court first asserted that the representative branches needed to define an adequate education in Claremont I, which was issued in 1993.  It provided no guidelines for doing so, telling the representative branches that they were free to choose from a “wealth of historical data … spanning more than three hundred years.”
.
Despite over 200 years of history and precedent to the contrary, the representative branches took at face value this absolutely incredible proposition that the words a “duty to cherish public schools” were really code for a “duty to define an adequate education,” and through the State Board of Education defined an adequate education.  And how did the Court respond?  Only four years later, in Claremont II, it ruled the State Board’s definition was unconstitutional, claiming that it did not “sufficiently reflect the letter or spirit of the State Constitution’s mandate.” 
.
What’s more, no longer were the representative branches free to define an adequate education based on a “wealth of historical data.”  Now the constitution required the definition to be based upon seven “aspirational guidelines” articulated in a 1986 decision by the Supreme Court of Kentucky.
.
Rather than asking the obvious question what the aspirations of Kentuckian judges could possibly have to do with the New Hampshire constitution, the Legislature and Governor virtually bent over backwards to comply with Claremont II.  Committees were formed, forums were convened and experts were consulted.  Ultimately, a study prepared by Augenblick & Myers was used to set the cost of an adequate education.

And then what happened? The Claremont plaintiffs immediately returned to court, claiming that the Legislature had not correctly calculated the cost of an adequate education.  Among other things, they claimed that the formula didn’t use the proper assessment tests to gauge student performance and didn’t contain enough money for transportation and capital costs. 

Read more

If the Dems win… a look to the future.

The taxpayer watchdog group Americans for Tax Reform has issued the following press release. While they may not openly trumpet their real plan for America, Democratic party leaders do give clues from time to time. Discerning their actual agenda should they win in the November elections reminds me of the days of "Kremlin watchers" trying to get a … Read more

Wasting money on public transit in the “sticks”

One of my long time pet peeves has been the gobs of gas-tax and other tax-funded monies wasted on certain public transportation systems. I certainly support and appreciate public transportation systems in urban areas- where they are cost-effective (for the most part) and heavily used. It is when attempts are made to bring widespread service to rural areas that it becomes a costly, underutilized proposition- which I have a problem with.
.
In this earlier posting (on our sister-blog) on the latest attempt to launch public transportation here in the Lakes Region of NH- certainly not a densly populated urban area- I wrote
They’re Baaaaack! That’s right- the area, relatively unchanged since the last public transit authority went belly-up due to lack of money and interest, now finds itself with a new public transportation company- (a jobs program for well-connected bus drivers?) but already saddled with the same problems that plagued its predecessor: money- or the lack thereof.
With rider fares around a few bucks or so, the bulk of the money needed to run a bus transportation company through the mountains and back roads of central NH comes from someone else: you and me.

Read more

Study: Shift Away From Broad-based Tax Increases

The state of New Hampshire has thus far resisted the siren’s call to broad-based taxes. Proposals to enact an income tax or a sales tax have spelled doom for many a gubernatorial candidate through the years. While our state still spends much more than it should, a degree of caution is generally exercised when approaching budgets. Because we … Read more

Something’s got to be done

Brent over at Weekend Pundit has a quick discussion about tax reform, citing Ed Feulner over at TownHall.  The money quote from Brent:

I like the story of one of NH’s senators Judd Gregg, who has special training beyond law school in tax law. Yet he can’t even do his own taxes, it’s just too complex

The original purpose of a tax is to  raise money for a given level of government.  With all of the additions and changes (with very few deletions) over the years, they are both right -> this is nothing more than a hodgepodge of rules to favor a given entity over another.  In short, it is the easiest and fastest way to manipulate the public into certain behaviors and to be used by companies against each other (or industries for that matter).  At the same time, it has provided braces and college educations to the offspring of those that benefit the most – tax accountants, lawyers, and lobbyists.

For the rest of us, it is either having to employ our own accountants and lawyers, sweating and uttering choice words before, on, and shortly after April 15th.  And given the rising cut of government taxes, perhaps fewer braces and lesser college education than if we were able to keep more of our hard earned money.

Here’s what should be done:

Read more

How often does this happen in YOUR town?

Foster’s Online reports on the use of taxpayer funds to promote voting one way or another. One such case has reached the NH Supreme Court. Attorney Charles Douglas, who represented the organization in court, said taxpayers should not be funding government-produced newsletters urging support for a particular viewpoint. He said the town spent $1,300 to … Read more

NH’s “Governor Do-Nothing”

For the past year and a half, it has been an inside joke between me and my wife: whenever New Hampshire’s Democrat governor John Lynch appears on TV, we each do our best Howdy-Doody imitations, wildly waving to some imaginary crowd with the dumbest, blankest looks we can muster, complete with exaggerated smile. Of course … Read more

CCAGW 2005 Congressional Ratings

Press Release
Washington, D.C. – The Council for Citizens Against Government Waste (CCAGW) today released its 2005 Congressional Ratings.  For 17 years, CCAGW has examined roll-call votes to separate the taxpayer advocates in Congress from those who favor wasteful programs and pork-barrel spending. 
The 2005 Congressional Ratings cover the voting year 2005, or the first session of the 109th Congress.  CCAGW rated 34 key votes in the House and 24 key votes in the Senate.  Votes included a budget reconciliation bill that will save a $39.7 billion over five years in mandatory programs, a tax reconciliation bill that would protect the tax cuts passed in 2001 and 2003, reforms in class action lawsuits, the Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), and affirming the Base Realignment and Closure Commission (BRAC) recommendations. 
The entire House had an average of 45 percent a six point increase over 2004.   House Republicans averaged 73 percent; House Democrats averaged 13 percent.  The entire Senate had an average of 46 percent also a six point increase over 2004.  Senate Republicans averaged 68 percent; Senate Democrats averaged 18 percent. 
There were two Taxpayer Super Heroes with a score of 100 percent:  Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) in the Senate and Ed Royce (R-Calif.) in the House.  Taxpayer Heroes are members who scored between 80 and 99 percent.  The total number of Heroes and Super Heroes in the House dropped from 59 in 2004 to 52 in 2005.  The number of Heroes and Super Heroes in the Senate remained the same at 10. 
.
“Talk is cheap,” CCAGW President Tom Schatz said.  “The voting record is the best way to measure a member’s commitment to fiscal discipline.  Unlike the Taxpayer Super Heroes and Heroes, too many members of Congress demonstrate little regard for the harmfull effects of a large and cumbersome federal government.”
CCAGW’s website features the complete 2005 Congressional Ratings, including vote descriptions, scorecards for the House and Senate, personalized scorecards for each member of Congress, historical comparisons, and averages by chamber, party, and state delegation.  Visit www.cagw.org 
The Council for Citizens Against Government Waste is the lobbying arm of Citizens Against Government Waste, the nation’s largest nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to eliminating waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement in government.

Read more

I thought I was working for my family….

From the American Spectator: Americans finally have stopped working for government. Many people are familiar with "Tax Freedom Day" — April 26th this year — when they effectively finish paying their taxes. But with government running huge deficits and imposing massive regulatory requirements, we all spend a lot more time working for government. Cost of … Read more

Share to...