MicroGroks
Supreme Court (SCOTUS) justices heard oral arguments Monday in Barton v. Barr. The case asks the court about legal alien status and whether a green-card holder not seeking admission to the U.S. can be “rendered inadmissible?”
Clarence Thomas is our era’s most consequential jurist, as radical as he is brave. During his almost three decades on the bench, he has been laying out a blueprint for remaking Supreme Court jurisprudence. His template is the Constitution as the Framers wrote it during that hot summer in Philadelphia 232 years ago, when they …
Senate Democrats threatened the US Supreme Court not to review a case brought by the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association against the City of New York. SCOTUS ignored them or, because of them, will hear and rule on the matter.
Tuesday at a New York synagogue U.S. Chief Justice Roberts lamented the perception SCOTUS is becoming politicized. He also does not think the justices’ decisions are guided primarily by their partisan affiliation. Those two things are an indictment of his naiveté.
The New York State Rifle & Pistol Association had their case against the City of New York accepted for Supreme Court Review. The City immediately realizing the Court might rule against them affecting laws nationally, changed their law. Too late?
Yesterday I reported on the back and forth between an Oakland ‘Obama’ Judge and the 9th Circuit. The 9th limited a lower court injunction (twice) on Trump’s asylum rule to AZ and CA but SCOTUS, having had enough, has stepped in and on the issue.
Labor leaders have launched a state-level counterattack against the Janus decision because public unions need revenue. Janus is a 2018 Supreme Court decision. It declares mandatory union dues and fees for government workers unconstitutional. The Supreme Court ruled that mandating union fees as a condition of employment violates the free speech rights of workers. The …
Janus … They’re Back … Public Unions Need Revenue Read More »
We went bug hunting last night. Mike, and Skip, and I huddled into a Zoom meeting to test its potential as a podcasting platform. I think we can agree that this will work.
A week ago we reported on a letter from five Democrat US Senators “threatening” the US Supreme Court. That brief, filed by Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse, caught the attention of Judicial Watch.
The ongoing saga of three women who want to go topless in New Hampshire continues. The ladies are challenging a Laconia town ordinance that prohibits the practice. Having failed to find relief at any court in the Granite State, they’d like SCOTUS to hear them out.
