It’s for the children

To the Merrimack School Board (and others): NO to the Jab!

This is an edited and enhanced version of a handout I created and which was given around at the Merrimack School Board meeting on September 20. I intend to break apart the handout into topical posts (jabs, masks, etc.) while folding in new information as I find it.

A Boost from Ed’s post: “So, Governor, You Want to Talk About the Constitutionality of HB 1264? Let’s Talk.”

by Skip

I thought these comments get to the nub and heart of the problem – seemingly, Progressives can’t understand it at all. I guess it’s the same bigotry of low expectations when they scream and holler that requiring “oppressed, minority, and underrepresented communities” can’t do the same things to get an ID like everyone else. What is so dang hard about out of state tuition?

Liberal Conservative • 2 days ago
This is not complicated in any way. Here’s the test: do you pay out of state tuition? Yes. Then vote via absentee ballot from your state of residence because you can’t vote in NH. I just don’t understand what is so difficult about this.

Bryan W Liberal Conservative • 6 hours ago
It’s not difficult. I know I’ve posted here before – when my daughters decided to become Utah residents so they could get in-state tuition there, the process there was simple, but could take up to a year: 1) Establish yourself at an address. 2) Get a Utah drivers license or non-drivers ID. 3) Register your car(s) in Utah if you have any. 4) Register to vote using that ID. 5) Pay in-state income tax or property tax (even if you don’t owe anything). You have to satisfy 3 out of 5 tests, then you can get in-state tuition. Gaining residency for voting purposes here should be no less stringent.

But Progressives say “that’s too HAAAaaarrdd” for college students to do. After all, a WHOLE YEAR?? Oh wait – they’re here for four, right? So let me get this straight:

Progressives: giving breaks to the lawless, declaring the guilt of the lawful

by Skip

Hmmm. When I first saw this, I went “yup”! A warning to the lawless, the criminal class: “Now, now children, you need to behave. Please follow the rules, please obey the law. After all, it’s for the children.’ That seems to be the message – a slap on the wrist AND the expectation that it is all that it will take. After all, this is just “guidance” to criminals to “perfect them” (after all, killing innocent children in a gun free zone is not a nice thing”.

And then Progressives are all happy to trust the criminal class to then behave themselves – cut them a break, as it were. After all, it is the fault of Society that they are the way they are – we ALL are to blame for their actions. And then go all agog when their expectations go awry again. Rinse, repeat. Always the “eternal second chances” as they are not responsible for their actions – they are implicitly part of the vast “identity victim class” that must be protected (again, it.just.isn’t.their.fault).