I thought these comments get to the nub and heart of the problem – seemingly, Progressives can’t understand it at all. I guess it’s the same bigotry of low expectations when they scream and holler that requiring “oppressed, minority, and underrepresented communities” can’t do the same things to get an ID like everyone else. What is so dang hard about out of state tuition?
Liberal Conservative • 2 days ago
This is not complicated in any way. Here’s the test: do you pay out of state tuition? Yes. Then vote via absentee ballot from your state of residence because you can’t vote in NH. I just don’t understand what is so difficult about this.Bryan W Liberal Conservative • 6 hours ago
It’s not difficult. I know I’ve posted here before – when my daughters decided to become Utah residents so they could get in-state tuition there, the process there was simple, but could take up to a year: 1) Establish yourself at an address. 2) Get a Utah drivers license or non-drivers ID. 3) Register your car(s) in Utah if you have any. 4) Register to vote using that ID. 5) Pay in-state income tax or property tax (even if you don’t owe anything). You have to satisfy 3 out of 5 tests, then you can get in-state tuition. Gaining residency for voting purposes here should be no less stringent.
But Progressives say “that’s too HAAAaaarrdd” for college students to do. After all, a WHOLE YEAR?? Oh wait – they’re here for four, right? So let me get this straight:
We’re supposed to listen to high school kids about gun control (and blackmail a private company) and the taking away a Constitutional Right because “they are wiser than adults”, yet they can’t, a few years down the road, to understand that if they (more likely, their parents) are paying out of state tuition, they aren’t residents? But yet some on the Left ALSO want 16 year olds to be able to vote. Head-snapping time.
Which is it, Progressives? Can’t have it both ways, both smart and dumb at the same time.
Oh wait! It’s AGENDA time, isn’t it? As Alinsky taught and Rahm Emmanual said “never waste a crisis” – or make one up if need be. Or, as always, change the language.
It’s always about the Agenda.
And it is NEVER about “it’s for the children” – it’s about USING the children.
As political pawns. To advance the Agenda.
Our commentors are quite intuitive, smart, and are tired of the BS that the Progressives throw like monkeys (or prisoners). Go ahead, Progressives, we know you lurk here – what say you?
(H/T: GraniteGrok)