MicroGroks
About two months ago, I posted DemocRATS May Very Well Succeed in Negating New Hampshire’s Voter-Residency Requirement. This is not an instance where I enjoy saying “told you so,” but I told you so. To recap, the prior Legislature passed … and Governor Sununu eventually signed … HB 1264 a measure to redress out-of-State college …
So yesterday I posted N.H. Democrats Lying – Telling Nonresidents They Can Vote In N.H. and Remain Nonresidents. The post was about a tweet from Executive Council candidate, DemocRAT Cindy WORMington AND THE LINK IN HER TWEET: This: And this … from the website of the New Hampshire DemocRAT Party … is what WORMington is …
This: And this is what WORMington is linking to: This is a LIE. As I explained in a previous post about the law (HB 1264) that made the act of voting in New Hampshire (declaring domicile in New Hampshire) a declaration of residency in New Hampshire, subjecting the voter to all of the responsibilities of …
There is a lawsuit in the Federal District Court of New Hampshire called Caroline Casey et al. vs. New Hampshire Secretary of State et al. The real plaintiffs (party bringing the lawsuit) are the New Hampshire Democrat Party and its litigation-arm, the New Hampshire ACLU (hereinafter DemocRATS). The subject of the lawsuit is a clean-election …
DemocRATS May Very Well Succeed in Negating New Hampshire’s Voter-Residency Requirement Read More »
A DC Circuit court has made what should seem to be a self-evident claim. Federal agencies so empowered can repeal their own rules. Net Neutrality being one of them.
As he said, he’s waited 20 years of fighting voter fraud here in NH. He’s put in the paperwork and now the ACLU has until the end of the month to respond. What’s the purpose – a process of discovery. Listen for yourself and if you have been following Ed during his journey, you can …
