citizenship certificate

JANZ: No “Birthright” Citizenship for Non-Citizen Aliens

For the purposes of this discussion, I will not use the term “illegal alien” to indicate someone who is currently in the US through illegal means. Instead, I will refer to them, and those who have been granted visitor status (which including “green card” holders), as “noncitizen aliens”. One of the questions before the SCOTUS … Read more

American Flag

Bowman: On Birthright and Citizenship

With his typical attention to detail, President Trump has opened up a Supreme Court can of worms by questioning the jurisprudence that the Fourteenth Amendment has been responsible for producing for too long. As depicted with this recent rash of nationwide injunctions, it’s apparent that lower courts have joined up with the top court’s current … Read more

ACLU

MacDonald: The ACLUs Latest Dumbass Election Lawsuit

When Governor Sununu signed HB1569 into law, the Proglodytes lost their minds. How dare you require proof of citizenship for first-time voter registration? This is an outrage. People will be turned away and denied their right to vote. Quick question for the ACLU? Where are the lawsuits against requiring the same information for other purposes? … Read more

American Flag

Re-Birthright Citizenship

Just thinking about something that came up last night at dinner with friends. If someone visits the United States, and is born again, does he become a citizen?  Ruth Ward et Rick Ladd removenda sunt  

Addressing Misconceptions

How many of us have tortured ourselves by reading the 14th Amendment in its entirety?  I understand that, other than the first section, with its opening sentence, the remaining four sections amount to the irrelevancy of being unrelated from the amendment’s original purpose of granting citizenship to those who gained freedom after the Civil War. … Read more

Why the World Is Giving Up on Birthright Citizenship

Earlier this week, Donald Trump signed a new executive order which attempts to end so-called “birthright citizenship” in the United States. During the signing ceremony, Trump declared that the United States is “the only country in the world that does this with birthright…” This is untrue and the Washington Post, among other publications, was quick to … Read more

American Flag2

Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship

Skip mocked “Da’ Media” whiners who are overwhelmed by the amount of information they’ve been force-fed in the past few days. Boo, frikkin hoo. We’re looking at the same firehouse …with the uncontrolled glee one might express while being gang-tackled … by puppies. It’s fun. Every EO does not have to be your favorite, but … Read more

Vote, ballot, ballot box

There’s A Way To Stop Noncitizens From Voting And Dems Are Fighting It

American elections should be decided by American voters. That is why the U.S. House of Representatives recently passed the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, legislation that defends that basic principle by requiring proof of citizenship to vote. In a sane world — especially with an election on the horizon — the SAVE Act would quickly get a vote … Read more

American Flag original image by by Dave Sherrill on Unsplash

Is Citizenship A Thing Of The Past

When I was a school-age child in the sixties, patriotism had a massive influence on our lives—our day started with the Pledge of Allegiance and the Our Father. We will talk about the former today and leave the Our Father for another day. There was no question about participation. Only Jewish kids were allowed to pass on the prayer.

Read more

Why Read The Federalist Papers?

Description: Everybody in America should exercise their duty of citizenship. One of the best ways to do so is to read The Federalist Papers. If you take the time to do so you will benefit from it. You will come away with a different perspective of our constitution. In turn, that new understanding will benefit … Read more

So what WOULD the difference between a Citizen and non-Citizen be?

First we have California wanting to let non-Citizens to be on juries – our “peers” that COULD eternally deprive us of my Liberty when they may still adhere to the historical and legal precepts held over from their country of origin?  How would THAT serve us well as a society?  I talked about Progressives forcibly trying to blur the lines between Citizens and non-citizens, that their sense of “Community” overrides the actual legalities of the obligations of Citizenship.

Now, we see the next shoe drop – if non-citizens are allowed to vote, what is left of the notion of what a citizen is?  From the Left  Coast to the virtual Left Coast of New York City:

New York City is poised to become the first major city to grant non-citizens the right to vote.

The New York City Council’s committees on immigration and government relations will today hold joint hearings on a proposal that would allow non-citizens to vote in city elections, and backers of the effort say they have a veto-proof majority, according to the New York Daily News.

Citizenship is currently a requirement for voters throughout New York State, but this legislation, “Voting By Non-Citizen Residents,” would change that, allowing immigrants who are “lawfully present in the United States” and have lived in the city for longer than six months to vote.

“This is extremely important, because it’s based on the founding principle of this country and that was, ‘No Taxation Without Representation.’ All of the people who would be included in this and would be allowed to vote are paying taxes, they’ve contributed to society,” Councilman Daniel Dromm, a co-sponsor of the proposal, told Talking Points Memo.

Read more

Just another devaluation of Citizenship?

Or just another attack on the responsibility of citizenship?

Jury BoxIt IS a basic pillar of American Jurisprudence is that we are to be judged by a panel of our peers – people that should at least share some common values and outlook on guilt / innocence and presence / absence of evidence.  And be able to logically connect the dots running between all those things within the confines the applicable law.  We, as Citizens, are expected to fulfill this duty and responsibility – those that are accused need to be judged by fellow citizens.  I am amazed, at time, how often my co-workers in Southern California are called to do just this, for here I am in central New Hampsha, having lived in the same town and same house for 30 years, and I have yet to be called even once (or TMEW, but the Eldest and the Youngest have)!  I know a lot of people do an awful lot to keep from being empaneled as they never know what kind of case they’d be put on – the fear being a long drawn out trial in which they might lose their job or miss out on some important marker in life (e.g., wedding, funereal).  To be honest, I would like to be called.

With all that said, I think this is a horrible idea (emphasis mine):

California would allow noncitizens to serve on juries under a proposal being considered by state lawmakers, potentially expanding a fundamental obligation of American life to millions more people.

The measure, which would apply only to legal residents, would make California the only state to open the jury box to noncitizens who meet all other requirements of service, according to legal experts. The proposal raises the question of what it means to be judged by peers in a state where more than one in seven residents is not a citizen. One of the bill’s authors, Assemblyman Bob Wieckowski (D-Fremont), said the proposal would help ensure an adequate pool of jurors, help immigrants integrate into American society and make juries more representative of California.

Read more

Share to...