MicroGroks
As the term ‘insurrection’ is normally used — think about the Whiskey Rebellion, or for that matter, the Battles of Lexington and Concord — it’s laughable to call the events of January 6 an insurrection.
Where is the follow-up to President Biden, responding to a supposedly unscripted question at his press conference, saying that he can answer after he finds the card? Remember a “hard-hitting” journalist asking the president if his “kindness” is the cause of the surge at the Southern border?
Last I knew, “insurrections” end up with two sides killing a lot on both sides. With regard to the Capitol Rion in DC on January, 6th, there were very few deaths and none was caused by civilians. That already strains the credibility of Democrats calling it an insurrection, but now this!?
An FBI official investigating the events of Jan. 6 at the Capitol gave testimony before the Senate. There were no firearms confiscations that day. So what about that “armed insurrection” narrative we have listened to it for two months from all the Democrats and the establishment media?
