Apropos ABA Rule 8.4, I have cited court corruption before. I have brought it up with the AG’s office, with DA Paul Halvorsen of Merrimack County and it has been brought up and is in the record with the United States Senate Judicial Committee as well. In fact, it is part of the reason why former NH AG Michael Delaney was forced to withdraw his application as a judge to the First Circuit Court of Appeals.
We want to thank Claire Best HERE for this Op-Ed. If you have an Op-Ed or LTE
you would like us to consider, please submit it to Editor@GraniteGrok.com.
To say something is wrong in the New Hampshire Courts and Law Enforcement ranks would be a wild understatement. Judge Julie Introcaso’s misconduct is the tip of the iceberg. Other judges who have been caught out before have also had to resign, and yet the club carries on as if it is above accountability and the law.
Are the New Hampshire courts, judiciary, and police involved in a sex ring, and are they, in fact, intertwined with & complicit in the Diocese of Manchester and the sex abuse scandal? And are non-profits and agencies established to combat sex and child abuse, in fact, complicit in the cover-ups?
The attached letter leads me to believe they are. It is between Judge Bernard Hampsey (who I gather is close to NH Supreme Court Chief Justice Gordon MacDonald) and Rev. James A. “Seamus” MacCormack. It is from May 2002. Please note the denials in it and reference to a letter sent on personal – not court – stationery. What is the need for a judge to send a priest a letter on personal stationery when there is a probe into sex abuse at the diocese in which the AG’s office (where Jim Rosenberg of Shaheen & Gordon worked at the time) is involved?
Apparently, the Executive Director of SNAP sent a letter of resignation yesterday after requests for information about SNAP’s cover-ups of Rev. MacCormack.
The letter attached below seems to suggest a relationship that is not professional between Judge Hampsey and Seamus MacCormack. Where is the separation between church and state? It appears non-existent.
What is that relationship?
There is a complaint from 2008 from a priest who claims he was retaliated against by the Diocese after finding a box of sex toys that former Monsignor Arsenault took from him and told him never to talk about again. Shortly after Arsenault left the Diocese of Manchester and went to work at St Lukes Institute in Maryland – itself mired in controversy and sex scandals. The complaint mentions Seamus MacCormack and the YDC.
Excerpts from the complaint read:
17. In or about October of 2002, the Plaintiff Father Coover discovered large quantities of pornographic materials, guidebooks containing locations of homosexual meeting places nationwide, and sexual attire including items consisting of leather and chains in multiple locations in the church rectory and garage;
18. Plaintiff Father Coover contacted the Diocese to disclose the discovery of such items and to request instruction as to how to proceed;
19. Defendant Father Arsenault, on behalf of Defendant Bishop McCormack and Defendant Diocese, instructed Plaintiff Father Coover to assemble the found items, place the items into a sealed container and deliver the container directly to the Chancery in Manchester, New Hampshire;
20. Plaintiff Father Coover delivered the found materials as instructed and was further instructed by Father Arsenault not to discuss the circumstances with anyone;
From later paragraphs:
41. Thereafter, Defendant Father Arsenault, made false statements to Plaintiff Father Coover’s employer, Youth Development Center (“YDC”) of Manchester, New Hampshire, and was placed on administrative suspension, ultimately resulting in Plaintiff Father Coover’s resignation;
42. Based on information and belief, the administrative suspension resulted solely from false and misleading statements made by Defendant Father Arsenault to staff members of the YDC;
In 2013 Gordon MacDonald (at Nixon Peabody at the time) defended the Diocese in a case brought by a family whose young teen son claimed he was being groomed and shown pornography by a priest.
Why did Assistant AG Jane Young shake hands with former Monsignor Edward Arsenault when he took a plea deal in 2014? Why was he transferred from Concord Men’s Prison to Keene’s jail? Why was he then released on home confinement? Why did Chuck Douglas Esq describe Monsignor Edward Arsenault as so pleasant to work with? According to Caroline Douglas, her ex-husband littered his trash with condoms from a sexual relationship he was having behind her back in their own law offices. And according to other documents, he (at the time New Hampshire’s Supreme Court Chief Justice) was sending impregnated teenage girls from the youth detention center back there after the state arranged an abortion because she wouldn’t name her rapist.
Could it be that her rapist was someone in law enforcement, in fact? David Meehan, I believe, is the plaintiff from YDC who went on video camera to say that he was sodomized by a police officer before going to YDC. And from my research, it would appear that David Vicinanzo, Gordon MacDonald’s former partner at Nixon Peabody, was not happy that a reference to sexual abuse by a police officer was made by his client. Why not? What’s David Vicinanzo’s interest in covering up sex abuse by police officers? Why is the NHCADSV so silent about all of this?
In 2015 or so, Senator & former AG Kelly Ayotte’s aide was caught in a sex trafficking/prostitution ring which she claimed to know nothing about. I find that hard to believe. I am also staggered that the NH Bar took no action to investigate further. Again, NHCADSV was silent.
Is it not appropriate, given the below, for a probe into the involvement of members of the court, police, and other agencies in prostitution, sex trafficking, child trafficking, and child abuse?
Gordon MacDonald, I believe, blamed “victim negligence” to defend the state for child sex abuse at YDC. He also argued to block the release of files of corrupt police officers, and his deputy, Geoffrey Ward, deleted the files of 28 or so with no explanation. Are they hiding sex abuse of minors by police officers or prostitution among their own?
Something is wildly wrong with New Hampshire’s courts and the collusion and cover-ups between AGs office, police, DCYF, and NHCADSV. There have been too many cover-ups for this to go on ignored.
Why is it that someone called Niko Roswell on Instagram under the tag @itsabouttogetloud is stating that his mother, Armida Geiger, a senior administrative assistant at UNH (which receives millions to address, prevent, and research child and sex abuse) and a member of the nonprofit Womenade, was involved in sex trafficking him (Nicholas Huppe at the time) and other boys in Rochester New Hampshire to priests and his grandfather, a decorated marine? He also claims he was sexually abused by his father- a police officer in Rochester. According to his Instagram, his mother worked for the Diocese of Manchester as the Secretary at St. Mary’s Church in Rochester, New Hampshire, and she owned a children’s school. If what Niko Roswell says is true, then he is Victim A of New Hampshire Family Court Corruption, Priest Child Sex Abuse, and Law Enforcement Child Sex Abuse.
How peculiar that Concord police detective Julie Curtin has been hired by Shaheen and Gordon and the Diocese to investigate him? Is she the detective that is hired to protect the exposure of sex rings involving friends of the court, police, and Gordon MacDonald? She has been MacDonald’s lackey to get files without warrants from St Paul’s School, and she has been complicit in an extortion racket, falsification of evidence, witness tampering, and shouldn’t be allowed near any investigation at all. She’s dishonest, and if you doubt my word, then read the trial record of New Hampshire v Owen Labrie and the SANE nurse’s rebuttal of Julie Curtin’s claims about her rape kit report or the State Lab Technician’s testimony about DNA which did not belong to Owen Labrie. And if you read Chessy Prout’s memoir, you might come to the conclusion that Julie Curtin is a child trafficker.
Julie Curtin worked for Gordon MacDonald to investigate St Paul’s school (which included making unsolicited cold calls to anybody she could find to be a victim, to train them for intercept calls (trained by NHCADSV) to wealthy targets after she’d obtained confidential student files without a warrant). And miraculously, there were no criminal proceedings, but there was a lot of money passing hands. I know because I was contacted by one such wealthy target of hers who could hear her training the “victim” she’d solicited on the other end of the line.
All she, Gordon MacDonald, Jane Young, the NHCADSV, Chuck Douglas, Shaheen & Gordon, and co were really interested in was extorting St Paul’s and protecting the crimes committed by their friends, children of their friends, or people whose families were useful to them. Making crooked deals doesn’t protect anyone. In fact, it creates an extremely dangerous environment. Let’s not forget the letter that Gordon MacDonald’s office sent to the publishers of Lacy Crawford’s memoir “Notes on a Silencing” about the inclusion of chapters regarding Julie Curtin. Let’s also not forget Julie Curtin’s admission to Lacy Crawford about secret deals between attorneys going on in her case or the fact that the attorney partner who organized a deal had recently received an award as attorney of the year. It’s sick.
Like so many other instances involving New Hampshire’s courts, police, DCYF, and co, there is a game of pass the buck, smoke and mirrors, hiding of files, and stonewalling when the public inquires. It effectively renders the courts untrustworthy, useless, a waste of public money, and a criminal sex, drug, and child trafficking cartel.
However, law enforcement and the judiciary are paid for by the people and are required to render services for the people – not for the police, priests, school administrators, or certain families with whom they have special relationships. The public does not pay for children to be manipulated, bullied, lied to, sexually abused, drugged up, force-fed scripts, or silenced by police, administrators, DCYF, or the courts.
The below email leads me to believe that members of the NH courts and police were involved in a sex ring. Is Julie Curtin a tool for the courts, Diocese, UNH, police, DCYF, and Shaheen & Gordon to hide that and other crimes, such as drug trafficking and money laundering involving their favored few?
