Here I’ve been, preaching Consistency (as in “Consistency breeds Trust yields Votes”) – so I must do the same as what I did here as I posted about felon Stacie / Barry Laughton (Democrat) running for the NH House with the key line:
This is about consequences of making deliberate actions – accused of a crime, found guilty of a crime, and now being a felon. Caught, the action was to double down and hide the evidence. Yes, Stacie / Barry can vote and run for office once the sentence is fulfilled. The law speaks to being out of prison – but does not cover probation or suspension. That will be the question to be answered. But voters will have to answer the question: with such judgment, showing such a propensity, is this attitude worthy of my vote?
Once again, I must ask the same question but on the Republican side of Dan Hynes; from DiStaso (emphasis mine, reformatted):
Attorney Dan Hynes of Merrimack says he’s learned his lesson, has paid a price for his crime and hopes the voters of state Senate District 11 can forgive him. That remains to be seen.
…But seven years ago, Dan Hynes was convicted of extortion for what he says now was a misguided effort to address gender-based discrimination. He said Monday that the Hillsborough County North Superior Court granted his request for an annulment – also just last week. Hynes, now 33, paid a fine, provided restitution to the victim, received a suspended 12-month jail term and had his license to practice law in New Hampshire and Massachusetts suspended for a year.
Read more