If employers had to pay even the least competent of their weak links a Benjamin an hour we could make everyone rich almost overnight.
A Reason To Not Expand Any Government Program – ‘The Mystery of Why We Still Have Poverty’
This is not a tale about Medicaid Expansion but then it is. We are spending so much taxpayer money nationally to eliminate poverty (with Welfare) that if we were to skip the middle men (national agencies, bureaucrats, pencil pushers and so on), poverty would not longer exist. According to a Cato Institute study published last … Read more
Demokrat Diktionary – ‘Welfare’
Welfare – 1. A program that spends $84,000.00 per year per family of four ($21,000.00 per eligible man woman and child) and still can’t manage to end poverty. 2. effort to empower Democrat voters in unelected and unaccountable public sector union jobs under the guise of helping people in need.
NH Democrats Protest – Scott Brown’s Not From Here. (But He Has A Better Claim Than Many of Your Registered Voters)
Democrat protesters held signs outside a Republican function in Londonderry, apparently incensed about the idea of Scott Brown claiming to be from New Hampshire…
Alana Biden claimed to be from New Hampshire, long enough to vote here, then she left. New Hampshire Democrats defended her residency claims and still do.
Martha Fuller Clark had a house full of people who live someplace else who claimed to be from here so they could vote, some who voted absentee using her address. New Hampshire Democrats defended her (and them).
More recently the Democrat who won the special election in Nashua, Latha Mangipudi, allowed Alysha Marie Tierney, a Democrat who has been continuously registered to vote in Ludlow MA since 2009, to claim she lived at Mangipudi’s 20 Salmon Brook home in Nashua, so she could vote in the Granite State in Nov 2012. Democrats not only defended that they elected her enabler to the state house.
Notable Quote–Marilinda Garcia
After being the recipient of an ill-bred school boy’s rancid temper tantrum, similar to what’s occasionally found on playgrounds after a boy realizes his true love is dating the quarterback thus confirming his suspicion about his own physical inadequacies, Marilinda Garcia was interviewed by the NRO. One line she said rings of Tocqueville and Madison … Read more
From Mark Steyn – Unarmed Man Goes on Shooting Rampage
The Corner A mentally disturbed man is wandering through traffic outside New York’s Port Authority Bus Terminal. Naturally, the NYPD open fire. They miss the guy. However, the sidewalks being full of people, they manage to hit two female pedestrians, one of them already using a walker, which comes in handy when the coppers shoot … Read more
NH Republicans – didn’t they learn from last year (raising the gas tax) at ALL?
We went through this gas Tax stupidity last year – starting in the House:
Yup, that’s right. The NH House’s Public Works and Highway Committee members decided that it was so durn important to fix roads and such, they couldn’t be bothered to really set a priority list and bump down others much less important (remember: “Maggie the Marxist” – she choose diapers over students?? $2 million for adult diapers? great prioritization) HB617 was just passed out of that Committee, 17-0, with nary a “limited government / less taxes” Republican throwing a single “Nay!”. Not one Republican could say “er, is this really not a good thing to do right now with gas quickly heading towards $4 / gallon WITHOUT the State of NH helping it along??
And we were all over HB167: here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here. I even gave some advice to NH GOP Chair Jennifer Horn on “messaging” and Consistency when she went after Maggie Hassan and not the Republicans who voted to raise the gas tax:
“I am saddened that any Republican voted to enlarge Government, to go along to get along, and not fight the good fight to find savings elsewhere and restructure Government priorities within the current budget to deal with these important matters. It would have been better for issues and needs of lower importance to receive less monies so as to take care of these higher ones; after all, it is what we all do around the family kitchen table every single day. Raising such a tax that affects so many citizens in a time of already high gas price only places a burden on them; Republicans should know and do better and I ask them to review the Platform so as to re-familiarize themselves what our word stands. After all, if we cannot stand by our own words, what do we stand for?“
Well, THANK you, NH State Senator Rausch (Republican), for trying to finish what the House Democrats and their Jr. Partners in making Government more costly last year:
Common Core and “unfunded mandate” – hmmm!
From the NH Constitution:
[Art.] 28-a. [Mandated Programs.] The state shall not mandate or assign any new, expanded or modified programs or responsibilities to any political subdivision in such a way as to necessitate additional local expenditures by the political subdivision unless such programs or responsibilities are fully funded by the state or unless such programs or responsibilities are approved for funding by a vote of the local legislative body of the political subdivision.
My favorite Article in the NH Constitution (mostly). It shows a respect for the Citizenry and the local towns “We won’t force you to raise Property Taxes for expenses we foist upon you”. The problem with this limiting Article for our limiting Government Document, few in State Government, either by elected or employed officials either know about it or govern by it. I know that when I asked my local officials what we have to pay for that is unreimbursed, I got laughed at. Imagine, however, if more ordinary folks did demand “If they ain’t paying, we ain’t doing”?
Like the School Board in Conway, NH (emphasis mine):
Although they admit there’s little chance of getting reimbursed, the members of the Conway School Board are asking the state to pay for costs related to switching to Smarter Balance testing as required by the new standards called Common Core, which they believe is an unfunded mandate.
Liberal Journalist Whines About W.H. Constitutional Abuses
Silly little lefty, of course statism begets tyranny. What did you expect?
Statism knows only one party, its own. And it protects its own with an wrought-iron fist. Some on the Left are finally on the receiving end of what they’ve been advocating for all these years, and are a little surprised.
Similar to the man marveling incredulously at his bloodied stump of a forearm after retracting it from the bars of a tiger’s cage, a Lefty journalist, Jeremy Scahill, marvels incredulously over the close control this White House asserts over the press. That is this Progressive White House, Leftist White House, read: statist White House. Why is he surprised? Doesn’t he understand statism? Did he really convince himself that there was such a thing as benign statism? Hasn’t he read history at all? Such a thing never existed, at least not for long. It’s the genetic, ingrained fallibility of man that undergirds this inevitability. The inevitability of policies, tactics, and culture his side has been advocating. That’s why the Founders adopted Montesque’s Separation of Powers, they understood this truth.
Don’t all those 23,000 workers-to-be know they are wrong? And Walmart is EVIL?
At every turn, I keep hearing from the community organizer and unionista types that working at Wally World – how can those folks let Walmart DO those evil things like pay them poorly and unable to support themselves without Government assistance? Never knowing their hours, moved around like cattle, no room for advancement (scratching head here – where DO all those supervisors, department manager, store managers, district managers all come from ??) – a veritable sweatshop selling nothing but low priced goods to “Walmart People”. The indignity of it all! After all, Liberal establishments ALL pay much better (oh wait, about that Leftist mag called Mother Jones….).
But somebody (lots of bodies, in fact) didn’t catch the message:
Occupy Wall Street has joined union thugs and other socialist anti-capitalists to protest Walmart providing jobs for millions of Americans recently. The economically challenged troglodytes don’t seem to understand, or care, that imposing an artificial minimum wage on a free market will only hurt employees and consumers.
Prop 8 in CA and now Elizabeth Warren proves my point
My stance used to be that anyone should be able to give as much as they want to any political group or candidate. They earned the money – and the First Amendment means ESPECIALLY that political speech should be free from government inteference. Yet, we have seen politicians, both at the national level and here in NH on BOTH sides of the political aisle, do all they can to obfuscate, “convolate”, and otherwise make it harder for ordinary people to have their say. BOTH Parties have create minefields of regulations that make it all but impossible for an ordinary schlub to get together with some buddies and make a political stand with some money. It all can be called “Incumbent Protections Acts”. So I used to think “hey, just use the ‘Net and list who the donors are if you really have to know.
And then CA’s Prop 8, to roll back homosexual marriage, happened. Donors were publicly listed and the militant gays went after most of them (see here from Heritage). We’ve seen the Obama campaign go after donors to Republican donors and use the force of Government to harass and otherwise use the “Progressive Chicago WAY” of politics to silence them. Thus, I openly advocate that NO donors should ever be forced to be revealed for instead of achieving the goal of more open and transparency in election, Progressives have used opposition donor list as retributive “hit’em hard” lists. And now US Senator Elizabeth Warren (D, Progressive-MA) is showing that full on again:
I’m generally for more disclosure in campaign finance, but the best argument against requiring full disclosure by groups engaged in political speech is that politicians sometimes retaliate against their critics. Sen. Elizabeth Warren inadvertently made that very argument this week.
What, she’s trying to give Joe Biden and Obama a run for their money?
Charitable monies, that is. You know, the line item on the 1040 where you get to put down how much you gave to charities? The one that Obama and Pack of Progressive Socialists want to get rid of; after all, to them, TRUE charity can only be given by Government policies and bureaucrats. Add another one to the Progressive Pile in leading us to the Nirvana of Progressive Giving by her example (er, but not giving at all!):
…In 2011, she earned $235,428, but gave a paltry $515 to charity. That’s less than one percent of her income, in fact, it barely scratches one-fifth of one percent.
…2012 wasn’t much better, even though her income jumped to $284,183. That year, she gave just $950 in contributions to charity, This works out to a very generous three-tenths of one percent!
That would be Wendy Davis of Texas. You know, this Paragon of Philanthropy whose claim to fame is to take other peoples’s money
Anybody else see the line that screams “Jr. Partners”?
From Roll Call, on an impending deal between Republicans and Democrats on the Federal Budget:
Budget negotiators are nearing a deal that could ease the way for leaders to avert another government shutdown before the 2014 elections, but only if rank and file — particularly in the House — buy into the agreement.
Senate Budget Chairwoman Patty Murray, D-Wash., and House Budget Chairman Paul D. Ryan, R-Wis., are expected to announce a framework in the coming days that would set a top-line number for appropriators higher than the current sequester levels but lower than what Democrats have previously demanded.
According to sources, the increased spending would be offset by less controversial pay-fors, including spectrum sales and some mandatory health care cuts. The two lawmakers have been meeting regularly, including a session Wednesday. Murray attended despite the Senate’s recess.
Oh yeah, I made it easy for you. There are a LOT of Establishment Republicans that are upset with that phrase “Junior
Another take: won’t this makes it easier for the NSA to track traveling cell calls?
Because these kinds of things NEVER end up getting extended, do they? I’m already not all that much liking that the Federal DOT wants a Black Box (a la a commercial jet) in my car they can access without my consent in the car that *I* have bought. Now, they want me (likely) to buy another GPS device so they can track me where I go? When will Government go back to leaving us all alone?
[Rep. Earl] Blumenauer’s [(D-Ore.)] bill, H.R. 3638, would set up a Road Usage Fee Pilot Program, which he said would study mileage-based fee systems. He cast his bill as a long-term solution for funding highway programs, and proposed it along with a shorter-term plan to nearly double the gas tax, from 18.4 cents to 33.4 cents per gallon.
“As we extend the gas tax, we must also think about how to replace it with something more sustainable,” Blumenauer said Tuesday. “The best candidate would be the vehicle mile traveled fee being explored by pilot projects in Oregon and implemented there on a voluntary basis next year.”
He said the bill would help answer questions about “how best to implement a vehicle miles traveled [VMT] system,” and said it “looks to the future and helps provide a more stable funding base for the next one hundred years.”
And we all know what happens to voluntary programs when it comes to Government revenues, right?
“You picked a fine time to leave me, Blue Shield”
Heh! (H/T: Cafe Hayek)
There is no such thing as an Obama-stash
(H/T: Liberal Logic 101)
An apt comparison? Then and now
First they came for…. And never believe that just because we have “America” in our name doesn’t mean it can’t happen here. If you think about it, there is MORE surveillance now in contemporary USA than was ever, EVER possible back in 1938. We think about the FBI, DEA, CIA, NSA, and the IRS needed … Read more
“I pity the fool!”
(H/T: Liberal Logic 101)
Once again, Government has acted to both split up families and have smaller ones if they survive
As Rush points out, it is the Left that has been, continues to, and will continue to attack what used to be seen as the main building block of both Civil Society and our Republic – the traditional family of a committed husband/ father and wife / mother that own the main responsibility of raising their children (and NOT that of “the village” or that those kids “belong to us all”). Government Welfare (“the dole”) of LBJ’s “Great Society” effectively castaway that committed husband; he left so that his family could get “aid” . This has all but destroyed the urban Black families and is rapidly doing the same to other minorities and poor whites as well. The MSM and Pop Culture Gatekeepers (magazines, Hollywood) extoll the excitement of cheating on your loved ones and the “Greed is Good” mentality. Religion, which once formed a common public morality” is under attack and the selfish ideologies of the 60s are now running amok (love that word, amok) full blown in this “All about ME!” mentality and ALL authority is not just suspect, but to be the object of an outright revolt. To wit – to heck with anything traditional and that goes against the Left’s morality is that Government is your Friend, your Daddy, your Husband, your Protector, and God.
I’ve said for a while now that Obama’s
Blogline of the Day – of drones and websites
“Obama has a web site that doesn’t work and drones that kill people. Amazon has a functioning web site and drones that deliver gifts.” (H/T: Instapundit)