Democrat Presidents have a disturbing history of weakening our military while strengthening our potential enemies. Hillary will continue these suicidal policies.

Muslim wars and terrorism began with Mohammed, 15 centuries ago. However, their attacks against the US were rare until President Carter abandoned the Shah of Iran, enabling Iran’s takeover by radical Muslims who have fomented terrorism ever since.

Despite increasing serious Muslim terrorist attacks, this threat was mostly ignored until 911.

Read more

Guest post for Dave Rivers:

Grassroots Democrats can’t be happy with the Democrat Party establishment who saddled them with a Presidential nominee who has a 30 year record of scandals and is now the subject of an active FBI investigation which could result in an indictment and conviction.

No one, not Democrats and not Republicans, wants our country in the position it is in, with the possibility of electing a President who will ultimately be shown to have committed perjury, violated the espionage act, or other major crimes.

And now we learn that it’s not just Hillary who is under FBI investigation but the Clinton Foundation is also under FBI investigation by at least four different FBI offices, for a variety of possible crimes.

Millions of Democrat primary voters rejected Hillary, perhaps concerned about her many scandals and apparent corruption, and voted for Bernie Sanders or other candidates. New Hampshire Democrats overwhelmingly preferred Bernie to Hillary, 60%-38%. Yet, the New Hampshire Democrat party establishment rejected the Democrat voters’ choice and cast their “super-delegate” votes for Hillary.

Read more

When asked to identify her accomplishments, Hillary supporters usually respond with mumbling and/or blank stares…and appropriately so.

Frustrated by Hillary’s and Obama’s dismal records, supporters like Carol Stappi (see her 10/13/16 letter, laconiadailysun.com) lash out, making fact-free attacks on their political opponents and maligning critics as driven by hate, racism or sexism.

However, as we criticized Bush, conservatives criticize Obama’s and Hillary’s policies that hurt people: making people poorer, less free, and less safe. We fight for policies that benefit law-abiding Americans who are, or want to be self-supporting, and anyone wanting to live in peace and safety.

Stappi suggests that Trump “advocates sexual assault on women”, that is a lie. If it were true, she would provide a link to the video, she can’t.

Read more

Shame? A meaningless word for Hillary Clinton

One of Donald Trump’s most pointed attacks against Hillary Clinton came during the second presidential debate when he suggested that Clinton should be ashamed of herself for denigrating those women who accused Bill Clinton of sexual misconduct. Later he added that she should be ashamed of her gross mishandling of classified government documents.

With a smug smile, Clinton calmly pivoted the debate to other topics. To many, her reaction only confirmed what they have known for years. The word “shame” means nothing to Hillary Clinton.

Donald Trump could not have

Read more

Back in the 1980s, squeegee men would go after cars, usually at red lights, go through the motions of cleaning a windshield and then (sometimes menacingly) demanding payment for a service that the car driver never requested.  Is this the model for Southwest Community Services in providing bus service and THEN demanding money from the towns it serves? Unasked?

I’ve never been a fan of such “public transportation” as it is basically a waste of money when you compare it to just hiring a taxi for the person needing a ride.  All the capital and maintenance costs, the wages, and the admin overhead never make it a going proposition.  I used to write about the “service” here in the Lakes Region of NH, commenting on fact that these mini-buses often tooled around empty most of the time and only occasionally had one or two people in it.

I noticed after I submitted a RSA 91-A for their budget and computed the cost/ride, they tinted the windows.

So, what did Southwest Community Services do?  From the Union Leader (reformatted, emphasis mine):

Read more

Has a single Democrat condemned Donna Brazile’s actions?

(H/T: Hot Air)

No, they haven’t.  So Brazile gets a DNC promotion to interim Chair because Debbie Wasserman-Schultz was guilty of rigging the primary election for Hillary over the other Socialist (Bernie) who was lying about it.  Then this fine upstanding “Christian” woman who wasn’t going to stand for being “persecuted” by Megan Kelly (by reading her own words back to from her own email bragging about getting a question to Hillary from CNN sources for a televised debate – who knew such a low bar?).

And then her own emails showed that she did it again?  Such a fine upstanding “Christian” woman – just like Hillary Clinton will continue to be Obama’s third term, is Brazile now DWS’s second term?  But I digress…

Read more

Classic reference in the title.  It is so nice to see that there is life after death but in Chicago, there’s a whole new meaning to “…bring out your dead” (emphasis mine):

119 people voted 229 times in Chicago, but there’s a catch…

The dead vote again… 119 people voted 229 times in Chicago after they were dead and buried. I bet this is just the tip of the iceberg in Chicago – a Democratic stronghold and Marxist utopia. Voter fraud is rampant there, but is anyone surprised? These are the stomping grounds of Rahm Emanuel and the Obamas. It’s just a normal election for these corruptocrats.

CBS 2 investigators found these instances of voter fraud by merging Chicago Board of Election voter histories with the death master file from the Social Security Administration. They were shocked to discover them, but they shouldn’t have been. This has been going on forever. Of course, Chicago Democrats are claiming that they are just clerical errors and there’s nothing to see here. That’s what they say every damned time it happens.

A couple of examples from the report:

Read more

From Steve’s post:

Everyone associated with the peaceful Bundy Ranch or Oregon Refuge “standoffs” was collected, arrested, and jailed without bail. After months of incarceration, despite a long list of charges, the government still had no case so they tried to get any or all of defendants to sign plea-bargains admitting guilt.

That actually didn’t work out. Defendants refused or were convinced that the government had no case. So the Feds finally put the Oregon defendants on trial for conspiracy and firearms charges. The jury found them not guilty.

We expect (hope for) a similar outcome with regard to the Bundy Ranch arrests, one of whom is Jerry DeLemus, still in jail in Nevada without bail on fabricated charges whose only purpose is to use the power of government to intimidate political opponents.

From Overlawyered:

Read more

Remember when Marco Rubio drank some water while giving the Republican response to the president’s 2013 State of the Union address? Remember how CNN ran a picture of the Florida Senator taking his sip with a chyron reading: “Career Ender”? “So can a drink of water make or break a political career?” Wolf Blitzer asked. Politico ran more than one column discussing Rubio’s “water thing.” Most other major (read Democrat) news venues covered it too.

So my question is this, if a drink of water threatens the career of a Republican, what happens when a former Democrat congressman makes sexual Twitter advances to a minor causing the FBI to seize the computer of his wife, the Democrat presidential candidate’s aide and a woman with ties to radical Islam, and the said computer is found to contain emails that potentially exposed classified information to our enemies so that said candidate could hide her likely influence peddling? Worse than a sip of water? Better?

–Andrew Klavan

(emphasis mine).  This can only happen with a press that leans so heavily Left that it defies the

Read more