Night Cap: 50 Shades of Sen. Gray Cui Bono – Who Benefits?

by
Op-Ed

It is amazing to me that at the same time the “Me Too Movement” was at its height, The Book 50 Shades of Gray, about a sociopathic power-driven millionaire abusing a willing female participant, was a best seller! Could this same dichotomy be in play between the legislative power brokers and the citizens of NH?

Lately, my constituents and a growing list of friends across the aisle have been writing to me with great abandon. It looks like some of the same actors, plus a few new ones, have stepped up for the sequel “How to Destroy Voter Confidence, Accountability, and Enforcement” (HB 463—fn. Election Portal bill @$550,000).

Swinging the whip is Senator “50 Shades of” Gray, Representative Ross “ITL” Berry, Sec of State Scandal, and a new character Sen. (AWFL) – Altschiller ( Urban dictionary – AWFL; affluent white female liberal)

HB 463 is a carry-over from 2023 – pushed by fellow Democrat colleagues. We are still learning more about the apparent deal between the House election law committee citizen voter abuser “ITL” Berry and Sen “50 Shades of” Gray and AWFL. (Final Vote on HB 463 not yet announced as of this writing). Guess who also Cui Bono (who benefits)?  Secretary Of State Scandal as his power quietly becomes centralized, to which he has recently reassured key Democrats in the last few weeks meetings.


We want to thank Carmen Sense II for this Contribution – Please direct yours to Steve@GraniteGrok.com.
You can review our ‘Op-Ed Guidelines on the FAQ Page.


In case you voted for HB 463 (the online voter portal bill) last time around, let me offer some of the most egregious insights from the voters who have written, texted, and called me. Maybe you will change your mind and honor our oaths on the final bill.

The legal and accepted definition of an affidavit can be found in RSA 659:30 and RSA 659.50 processing affidavit – absentee ballots. HB 463, as written, violates these laws. Most bizarre, HB463 makes the applicant’s phone number and email address – exempt from the Right to Know law RSA 654:31a

So, since when and why are we voting to violate our oath of office by not following the legal definition and the law? In HB463, the new voter simply self-identifies their affidavits of NH residency and citizenship – online (not required to have town clerks verification – in person) for this identification process. What could possibly go wrong at a time when illegal immigration has been identified as the #1 issue of the American voter and our sister states are giving out US driver’s licenses (no proof of citizenship)? This will violate & dilute the sovereign voting rights of the NH citizens and taxpayers.

HB 463 also does not identify if there will be any third-party access to our voter rolls—a big security issue, oversight, safeguards, programming, etc. Recently, in NY, an online portal that 63 counties audited had embedded coding to create a large web of fake voters.

Cui Bono—not our NH Voters. Our most basic constitutional and sovereign voting rights are being sacrificed on the shady altar of efficiency over security and accountability. In my review, I see no right of efficiency in the New Hampshire or US Constitution. Do YOU!

Vote no on HB 463. Stop the whipping and abuse of New Hampshire citizens, voters, and taxpayers.

You will notice the (II) in the author title. I have added an “II” to indicate that a second person has joined me, and hopefully, more will follow!

Author

  • Op-Ed

    GraniteGrok.com accepts Letters to the Editor, Op-Eds, Press releases, and other content. If you would like us to consider yours for publication, please email editor@granitegrok.com.  Submission does not guarantee publication.

Share to...