Left at a Loss as Muslims Protest “Porn” in Schools

by
Steve MacDonald

The media continues to provide air cover for the Left’s efforts to sexualize children in public schools, framing it as book banning by Christian fundamentalists. Is it to give them time to digest what they view as a traitorous rebellion? It’s not just Christian parents who object to the promulgation of the progressive lifestyle.

 

For months, hundreds of religious parents have regularly rallied outside a Maryland school board building, aghast at curriculum featuring books that portray LGBTQ+ families to elementary school kids.

Waving American flags, they have chanted against “indoctrination” of children. They’ve sued to pull their kids from lessons and argued their case on Fox News.

In battles against LGBTQ+ acceptance, it is often white evangelicals pushing for book bans or boycotts over beer brands or bathing suits. In this case, Muslims are leading the fight.

Democrats are beside themselves over it. After years of standing behind Muslims, dismissing the darker side of Islam, and supporting whatever they’ve brought to the table, this rebelliousness offends them. How dare they! But it was inevitable. CAIR is pushing back against the Left’s transgender agenda.

 

“The school system believes it is being inclusive toward LGBTQ parents and students,” said Zainab Chaudry, the Maryland director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a national civil rights group that put out calls for rallies over the Maryland books controversy. “But in doing that, it is not being inclusive toward another set of parents and students.”

 

The LA Times is generous in its coverage, quoting numerous progressive Arabs to pain opponents as… dare I use the word extremist? The reality, which will continue to cause them headaches and heartaches, is that Islam and the sexualization agenda are incompatible. The entire Progressive lifestyle will not comport with Islam in its traditional form.

Neither does the American Republic, but let’s not get distracted. The LA Times has done us a service. It says, “Religious parents… are aghast at curriculum featuring books that portray LGBTQ+ families.”

The LA Times, as with many claiming to protect these offerings, seems to have no clue what is in them. If they do, they claim that LGBTQ+ families promote Adult child sex (heterosexual and homosexual), drug abuse (including by minors), rape, incest, self-harm, and suicide.

There are books with rainbow unicorns, but no one cares about those. They are more concerned about the mental health issues arising from exposing children – unprepared mentally or physically – to grasp the subject matter. They object to civil servants undermining their religious liberty and rights as parents to frame their children’s spiritual, social, and cultural lives.

They object to this crap.

And no one is saying we should ban it. Access is an issue. Spending taxpayer dollars on it is an issue. Age appropriateness is an issue. And as noted above, the argument for including one group should not exclude another.

Public schools shouldn’t in any way be involved in this sort of “education,” and not just becasue they’ll likely screw it up as badly as they have the academics, which are much less complex than human sexuality and human nature. Per form, they could care less, but the rising opposition from Muslim families has the left confused, and I find that amusing.

It also demonstrates how much brighter we are than the average Liberal. We’ve been telling them this divorce was unavoidable for years, and here we are. Exactly how irreconcilable the differences remain to be seen, or more accurately, to what length will the Muslim parents objecting or the progressive gender-cultists advocating will go in support of their respective positions.

Will progressives resort to the level of name-calling so easily directed at other faiths, and does this cost them another victim-class voting base?

I’m intrigued by the conflict and can’t wait to see how things between them turn out and how effectively Islam, a faith that can brook no other, will use the First Amendment to get what they want until it no longer serves them.

 

 

HT | Don Surber


Scan the QR Code or Use the embedded form to get your tickets to Groktoberfest!

Author

  • Steve MacDonald

    Steve is a long-time New Hampshire resident, blogger, and a member of the Board of directors of The 603 Alliance. He is the owner of Grok Media LLC and the Managing Editor of GraniteGrok.com, a former board member of the Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire, and a past contributor to the Franklin Center for Public Policy.

Share to...