An oxymoron could be a toothless hillbilly high on painkillers. For our purposes today, we will cling to the standard dictionary definition: one or two words in which seemingly contradictory terms appear side by side.
Typical examples are “alone together,” “awful good,” “conspicuous absence,” and even “civil war.” Crash landing, definite maybe, and found missing also fit the bill: student teacher, soft rock, or silent scream. Military intelligence?
How about Liberal Historian?
As a rule, doing that liberal thing you do requires a look forward—no looking back except to change it. History is your enemy. The true purpose of a Liberal Historian is to rewrite it in your forward-looking image to hide past misdeeds or whatever it takes to suit your current narrative, as opposed to exploring it for objective truths or lessons we carry with us.
Liberal Historian Rachel Hope Cleves wrote a book in which she refused “to use words such as “survivors” or “abuse” when discussing the rape of a 10-year-old boy.” The non-fictional rape of a 10-year-old boy.
In the video, Cleves said, “In writing this book I didn’t want to use pedophilia discourse because I felt like it would fail to capture this other historical organizing system, for intergenerational sex, which was the topic I wanted to address.” Cleves then went on to say, “I don’t use the discourse of survivors or necessarily abuse to make sense of sources.”
Adults raping children is intergenerational sex. That’s the new “new” (new!) term for child molesting perverts for those keeping notes at home.
In a talk on her biography on pedophile writer Norman Douglas, @uvic professor Rachel Hope Cleves described pederasty as “intergenerational sex” and says she won’t use the discourse of “survivors or necessarily abuse.”
Douglas was charged with raping 10-year-old children pic.twitter.com/MSu6siE3rm
— Cosmin Dzsurdzsa 🇷🇴 (@cosminDZS) March 21, 2023
Behavior that is being normalized with your tax dollars in the local public schools (probably).
