NHGOP Committeeperson Juliana Bergeron is a Never-Trumper GOPe stooge and RINO extraordinaire, so when she claims that there are people in the Republican Party that want to put women back into the 1960s, I think she should name some names.
New Hampshire Republican National Committeewoman Juliana Bergeron told the newspaper that she saw Haley as a “credible” candidate but had cautionary words for women navigating the dynamics of Republican politics.
“There are people in our party that want to put women back into the 1960s, and so therefore I think it makes it somewhat more difficult for women in our party,” she said. “And I wish I didn’t have to say that, but that’s how I feel.”
Can Juliana define a woman? That is a problem as you move leftward across the so-called political spectrum. Bergeron is a bit further left than the average Republican, so she might struggle with defining a woman the way certain Supreme Court Nominees have.
And by back in the 60s, could she mean a time when everyone knew what a woman was, or was she pining for another sexual revolution? How about a pre-Roe America where states decided if abortion was legal and when (like today – so probably not that)?
Mixed messaging. Difficult for women or Juliana Bergeron?
In 2012, when she captured the gig by a slim margin of 50.7% of the NHGOP delegate vote, she said, “I’m very excited; it means another reasonable voice in the Republican Party.”
“If we keep electing divisive people” she said, “we’ll never be united. We need to elect people who will work with all groups, and we need to teach them that sometimes you have to compromise, that you can have conversations across the aisle.”
What she means is Republicans compromising by giving Democrats what they want as long as she keeps her gig as a non-divisive reasonable voice. Is accusing members of her own party of being bigots who want women in the kitchen having babies reasonable or divisive (if that’s what she means)? And what exactly does she mean?
She was for gay marriage when her party platform was against it. If we went back to the 60s, well – no women marrying women. Sounds confusing. And maybe it’s the “journalists” fault, but if I had to guess, and I don’t but I will, Bergeron is carrying tainted Trump-as-misogynist water for the 2024 never-trumpers and the political left.
They can’t let go of that p**** even after Joe Biden was credibly accused of actually doing that to a real live Democrat woman who worked for him.
How she ever got the NH GOP Committeegal gig is still a mystery.
