Here’s an idea I have blatantly hijacked from the fascist left. They wanted (many of them demanded) that victims of COVID vaccine self-harm get privileges denied to everyone else. Papers, please! Yes, passports. Well, why can’t we protect the New Hampshire advantage similarly?
The Northeast has more Democrats “than at which one might shake a stick.” But some have had what they think is a political road to Damascus moment (not that they could tell you what that means). Serial casualties of ballot-box self-harm, they find themselves overwhelmed by the burden of the Administrative state they erected, the cure for which appears to be in New Hampshire.
The last refuge of liberty in the region, clinging to that rhetorical tree like the leaf that refuses to fall even as winter sets in.
Much like the jabbed, these politically poisoned persons -best intentions aside – are better spreaders of the partisan progressive disease. They move from Vermont, Massachusetts, New York, or Connecticut and relocate to the Granite State. It’s beautiful, scenic, and safe, but how much would it hurt to add sidewalks, streetlights, or diversity administrators in the local schools?
The infection begins the moment they arrive. And while some might make it (or fake it) to the next federal election before renouncing their tryst with lady liberty as an unfortunate indiscretion, only a few genuinely accept that less is more when it comes to government.
What is a Free State to do?
Democrats wanted vaccine passports the way addicts need a fix. Fascist blood boiling for control, indifferent to history and where it leads. Let’s give them what they want (in reverse)? Freedom Passports. These beauties will include their publicly available party voting preference for the past four elections. Incoming invaders must present them before renting or buying property in New Hampshire.
Too much blue? New Hampshire’s not for you.
And if they are not up to date, we will presume you are still a Liberty Denier and ineligible for the common privileges others enjoy. I’m kidding, of course, but more than a few twigs snapped at the suggestion.
How dare you deny someone’s choices? This from the people who wanted to mandate the injection with boosters with police state-like monitoring.
Strange thing. People who felt they had not been provided enough information to give informed consent for the Jab would be denied fundamental freedoms, but at least a few among the misinformation disinformation crowd have been forced to accept the “vaccine deniers” were right. Amnesty, they say, and sorry about all that.
No.
The cure doesn’t prevent infection or transmission. There are significant risks that were never reported to patients. Even boosters make you more susceptible to hospitalization or death if you catch COVID more than once, which they do not prevent. At least 25% of Jabbed women report persistent menstruation issues, and the number of stillborns in Western countries has set records. Then there’s sudden adult death syndrome. They’re still in open denial about that, and the elites are still pressing their case. A new plague is undoubtedly in the offing with a reciprocal cure that transfers wealth to the ruling class oligarchs.
Liberty deniers, to the last.
Sadly, few, if any, of them will be held responsible for advocating the poison or the call for the abrogation of fundamental human or natural rights. The media that hyped the unchallenged narratives without question or joined the call to silence conscientious objectors won’t likely suffer either.
Maybe what we need is a passport that identifies them as that instead? Stooges for the ruling class messaging machine. As easy as an App on their phone, yes – we wouldn’t want to waste the paper. Make them show their credentials at every political event at which they speak or under every report. Oh, wait, we already have one—Party registration records.
Maybe that Democrat party passport idea isn’t such a bad one after all.
