Dan Richard: Stop Stalling, Chris Sununu!

by
Daniel Richard

PLAINTIFFS OBJECTION AND NON-ASSENT TO DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF INTENT TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S FILINGS

Now comes the Plaintiff objecting to the Defendants notice of intent to reply to the Plaintiff’s filings. Said notice is the continued obstruction by the Defendants to attempt to circumvent and delay the Plaintiff’s motion for expedited hearing of relevant testimony.


We want to thank Dan Richard for this Op-Ed. Please submit yours to Editor@GraniteGrok.com.


The Defendants notice of intent is erroneous, as the Court has accepted the Plaintiff’s Motions and Evidence as of October 19, 2022 and no more time is needed to file that which the Court has accepted and docketed into the Court record.

The Plaintiff’s motion for expedited hearing was filed on the 12th of October, and Plaintiff’s objection to the Defendants Motion to Dismiss was filed on the 14th of October, both were rejected by the Court in error, claiming that Plaintiff failed to notify the Defendants of such filing, which is imposable as the web portal will not allow the Plaintiff to complete a filing unless the Plaintiff selects method of service (U.S. mail or by hand) in order to complete said filing. The Court web site either by unintended mistake or by design, is obstructing the presentment of the Plaintiff’s pleadings and evidence.

Therefore, the Plaintiff respectfully moves the court for a hearing forthwith in order to provide sufficient time for the Secretary of State to notify the cities and towns of New Hampshire to provide and accommodate for hand counting.

Secondly, that court order the town of Auburn to disqualify any and all votes that don’t meet the N.H. Bill of Rights requirements, that they by qualified (registered) voters in Auburn, who will be absent from the town of Auburn on the day of the election, or registered voters who are unable to attend in person because of a physically disability, as required by the absentee voting provisions of the N.H. Bill of Rights, Part, 1 art. 11. The Plaintiff respectfully asserts that no additional provision for a mail ballot be counted, nor any additional provisions be allowed outside of that which the N.H. Bill of Right provides for.

I, Daniel Richard, swear under pains and penalties that foregoing is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Daniel Richard

Date: October 26, 2022             /s/ Daniel Richard

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hear by certify that a copy of the foregoing was served upon the Defendants Attorneys of record in this matter via the Court’s electronic filing system.

Daniel Richard
Date: October 26, 2022             /s/ Daniel Richard

 

 

 

Author

Share to...