When Will the FDA Tweet about Misoprostol (It Can Medically Induce Abortions) Being Horse Medication?

Remember that time at COVID Camp when the Karen’s lost their collectivist minds over a safe and effective medication that could treat people infected with SARS CoV2? It has a human version with decades of safe use, but all they could talk about was horse paste. Remember that?

There is a version of ivermectin for horses and cows (just ask WMUR) and it has antiparasitic as well as antiviral properties. But the efficacy of the latter – as an off-label treatment for COVID patients – so offended the Vaccinate or we’ll die despots that even the US Food and Drug Administration Tweeted,

 

 

While the FDA was telling Americans not to get confused about the antiparasitic horse paste, the CDC was recommending “people” Ivermectin for refugees and immigrants pouring into America. Not specifically for COVID, but for the treatment of parasites, but many of them might have COVID, so the benefit of the off-label application would not have been lost, even on them. Oh, and yes, there is a version that is safe for people, but the tweet is still up.

Related: WMUR Lies About Ivermectin Bill and Uses Horse Paste as Headline Photo

And this should be odd because the FDA is not unaware of the potential benefits of Ivermectin as an anti-viral, nor is the CDC. I’d wager they also know how much safer Ivermectin is than the mRNA inoculations they’ve insisted are safe and effective, knowing that neither is the case.

So, the response to Ivermectin was political, not scientific. It had nothing to do with public health.

So, what is their position on this?

 

 

Misoprostol is medically available to people for the same reason you’d give it to a horse (or perhaps a refugee?). Ulcers.

Misoprostol reduces stomach acid and helps protect the stomach from damage that can be caused by taking a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) such as aspirin, ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin), naproxen (Aleve), celecoxib, diclofenac, indomethacin, meloxicam, and others.

 

According to the FDA, Misoprostol can also “cause birth defects, premature birth, uterine rupture, miscarriage, or incomplete miscarriage and dangerous uterine bleeding. Do not use misoprostol if you are pregnant,” (and I wonder when the FDA is going to put that warning on the mRNA vaccines or is it too late?).

Is it also too late to note that condoms and other forms of birth control are also cheap and easy to get? Easier than Misoprostol.

Abortion mills make them available the way restaurants provide mints for customers on their way out since before Sandra Fluke testified before Congress about how they needed to protect contraceptives from Republicans who never said they would ban them.

I guess I should point out that neither mints nor Ivermectin will terminate a pregnancy, but they won’t rupture your uterus either.

And if you take Ivermectin instead of getting The Jab, you won’t lose your baby if – for some odd reason – you think of it as carrying a child instead of being “punished with a baby.”

And then there’s the FDA. I did a quick search, and there’s nothing about off-label use as a chemical abortion, but I did find this from 2015 (emphasis in original).

 

This Patient Information Sheet is for pregnant women who may receive misoprostol to soften their cervix or induce contractions to begin labor. Misoprostol is sometimes used to decrease blood loss after delivery of a baby. These uses are not approved by the FDA. No company has sent the FDA scientific proof that misoprostol is safe and effective for these uses.

There can be serious side effects, including a torn uterus (womb), when misoprostol is used for labor and delivery. A torn uterus may result in severe bleeding, having the uterus removed (hysterectomy), and death of the mother or baby. These side effects are more likely in women who have had previous uterine surgery, a previous Cesarean delivery (C-section), or several previous births.

 

Anyway, as you were.

 

Crytotec | Clinical Pharmacology

Share to...