Groomers and Governor Sununu VERSUS Parents

by
Ann Marie Banfield

Why is the Parental Rights Bill (HB1431) needed? It is needed because we have examples of groomers who are GROOMING and SEXUALIZING children IN our public schools. They are telling children to HIDE this from their parents.

The 603 Alliance also put out this fact sheet:

Here are the facts:

  1. HB1431 does not require the “outing” of kids questioning their sexuality or gender identity.
  2. It does not “target” gay and transgender kids for discrimination or disparate treatment.
  3. If a child wants to confide in a staff member at school that they are questioning their gender or sexuality, that is completely permissible under the bill.
  4. However, if a child needs counseling, requests a change to their official record or requires “action by school authorities pursuant to school policies” then parents will be notified.
  5. The bill also gives parents rights to information, transparency and other protections that are fundamental to the very difficult job of parenting and educating their kids.
  6. For those tragic circumstances where parents constitute a risk to their children, we have existing laws and institutions to address those risks.

Listen to this parent describe what happened to her daughter in her local public school. Parents are now considered evil until proven innocent.

 

We currently have a parent in Manchester NH suing that school district from hiding information from her. Let’s not also forget Kristie Torbick, school counselor, who groomed and then sexually abused a student in Exeter.

So who will Governor Sununu stand with? Groomers or parents?

Governor Sununu has already said he’s going to VETO HB1431 because it included a provision that would require school personnel to divulge information under certain circumstances. Here is the language he just can’t seem to accept:

“The right [of parents] to be notified promptly when any school board, school district, school administrative unit, school administrator, or other school employee initiates, investigates, or finds the need for any action by school authorities relating to the student pursuant to school policies governing student conduct, truancy, dress code violations, sexual harassment, bullying, hazing, behavior management and intervention, substance use, suicide prevention, gender expression or identity, disability accommodation, and special meal prescription.”

Here is the final version agreed to by the Senate and House.

The opponents say that they don’t want school officials to “out” children to their parents if they are experiencing gender confusion. That puts the State between parent and child. But who is better to help their child wade through these feelings than parents?

They argue that some parents may not be “supportive.” That may be the case. But unsupportive parents do not give up their fundamental rights when their child walks through the door of a school. Those parents might not be supportive of many of their child’s decisions in life, but should a public school then stand between a parent and child? Shouldn’t that be reserved for abusive and neglectful parents, through a court system? Since when is it ok for the State to come between a parent and child?

As we learn from the parent in the video, she exposes an agenda in public schools to groom and sexualize children in school. If this was such a good thing for children, why is there a need to hide it from the public?

Some of this deals with psychological issues, and counseling a child. Shouldn’t that be handled by educated professionals? Someone who has clinical training, holds a PhD in Child Psychology, and follows a strict code of ethics?

Instead you have political activists who are pushing children into a lifestyle that they may not even want for themselves. In cases I’ve been involved in, some of the children have been sexually abused or felt pressured by their peers or even people working in the school district.

Should children who experience gender dysphoria or same sex attraction be nurtured and cared for? Of course. But this notion that the State should come between a child and parent under these circumstances is wrong and dangerous.

In the video, the parent also reveals how the district wants to keep suicide attempts hidden from parents. At what point will everyone realize how dangerous these groomers are to children? When they are dead?

Call Governor Sununu and tell him to support HB1431, the Parental Bill of Rights in New Hampshire. There is no good reason for the State to come between a parent and child unless due process is involved and a judge orders it. 603-271-2121

The sexualization and grooming of children needs to stop:

screen grab grooming

book hilighted grooming

Author

  • Ann Marie Banfield

    Ann Marie Banfield has been researching education reform for over a decade and actively supports parental rights, literacy and academic excellence in k-12 schools. You can contact her at: banfieldannmarie@gmail.com

Share to...