We Know the Accused Domestic Abusing Superintendent is on Leave … IS HE ON PAID LEAVE?

by Skip

I sent in another right to know that has to do what “they” told the Laconia Daily Sun. That Gilford Superintendent Kirk Beitler is “on leave” until October (when the first hearing is to be held). That’s not the question people are asking – is it PAID or UNPAID Leave?

—– Original Message ——
From: “Skip” <Skip@granitegrok.com>
To: “Gandini, Gretchen” <ggandini@sau73.org>; “kthurston@sau73.org” <kthurston@sau73.org>; “jonos@sau73.org” <jonos@sau73.org>; “ksanborn@sau73.org” <ksanborn@sau73.org>; “AKelly@sau73.org” <AKelly@sau73.org>
Sent: 8/3/2021 8:56:17 AM
Subject: Questions and two more Right To Know demands

Good morning,

Questions: I am assuming that your Non-Public meeting is mostly about dealing with your employee.

Is Superintendent Kirk Beitler on Leave of Absence until his October hearing, a Paid Leave of Absence until then, or has he been relieved of his position?
Additionally, has all electronic access to the District’s digital assets been terminated until such time as he returns (if that is an option)?

RSA91:A demands:

  • Pursuant to the Right to Know Law (RSA. 91-A), I am demanding access, within 5 business days, a copy of the employment contract between the SAU 73 School District and Superintendent Kirk Beitler.  An emailed copy (to Skip@GraniteGrok.com) would be preferred or I will pick up a hardcopy version at the District office. Per RSA 91-A:4 IV(c) If you deny any portion of this request, please cite the specific exemption used to justify the denial to make each record, or part thereof, available for inspection along with a brief explanation of how the exemption applies to the information withheld.

 

  • Pursuant to the Right to Know Law (RSA. 91-A), I am demanding access, within 5 business days, a copy of the insurance contract between the SAU 73 School District and Pemex [later amended to PRIMEX -Skip]  (if I have spelled this wrong, I am referring to your insurance company that provides your idemnity coverage for lawsuits).  An emailed copy (to Skip@GraniteGrok.com) would be preferred or I will pick up a hardcopy version at the District office. Per RSA 91-A:4 IV(c) If you deny any portion of this request, please cite the specific exemption used to justify the denial to make each record, or part thereof, available for inspection along with a brief explanation of how the exemption applies to the information withheld.

Kindest regards,

-Skip

Pemex is the Mexican national oil company, Primex is the District’s insurance carrier for such indemnity issues. Apologies for the Oopsies!

Although this has gone in, I have not yet received a return message that it has been received.  Nor have I received a return on my RTK concerning the GL Lines in their budget concerning transactions concerning Legal Issue NOR the other RTK I submitted Monday night on CRT / HB2 demand for materials (note to self, need to post that up here later on today).

Share to...