I have been gathering a ton of posts on Critical Race Theory – the brainwashing attempt to “prove” that America was racist before it was founded (think The 1619 Project), has been racist during its entire existence, and it always will be. You’ll be hearing a lot from me on this going forward as it is the most existential, most pernicious attack on the American Threat there is. It is, IMHO, far more dangerous than all of the wars America has fought – those were fought at the physical level. CRT is at the emotional, ideological, philosophical, and soul level. It is what may well fulfill what has been prophetized of America for centuries – that we could not be beaten but that we would fall from within. And we’re seeing it happen right in front of us. Has America become so satiated, bored, and uneducated that the latter part of the phrase “If you don’t believe in God, you’ll believe in anything” is coming true?
Certainly, because of the weakness of our Government monopolistic system of education, we now have generations that have no solid foundation of what to believe in as Americans. We’ve been writing for years about those that are “Hate America Firsters” – certainly those that are promulgating CRT are part of that and are evangelizing those that are weak kneed, weak soul’d, and weak brained and poorly educated to be the same.
At its surface level, CRT is nothing but some call reverse racism; whereas racism was directed at Blacks, now it is directed at Whites. Or, to be perfectly blunt, anyone that is non-White can be discriminatory towards any one considered to be White (like George Zimmerman, who was of Hispanic origin, became “White Hispanic” because it fit the Trayvon Martin Narrative of the Left better when it was a “White man killing a Black teenager” than “Hispanic killing a Black teenager”. I had never heard of “White Hispanic” before that event happened). CRT sounds like racism but it isn’t – as Christopher Rufo has shown, it is (if I may paraphrase here) an offshoot of Marxism class conflict – meant to create a revolution as we have seen in history of revolutionary wars when Communists took over (as in the Soviet Union, China, Cuba, Viet Nam, to name just a few). It was always the Poor versus the Rich, the Powerless vs the Powerful.
Marxism never took hold in the US (until recently) as America was seen as being economically aspirational – not rich right now but with the right idea and work ethic, I could be! Plus, even the lower classes were far better off than in other countries – even today, our middle class is materially better off than their counterparts even in Europe. So attempts at creating warfare between the classes was mostly a dude.
But between the Socialist / Communist Frankfurt School, Antonio Gramcie and Marcuse, they hit upon America’s weak points – change the culture and inflame Society by using not economics but Race. And here we are today where Race has become the inflammation coursing through America’s veins – on purpose and as revenge. Race was almost a non-entity (when considered in the macro) before Obama – he relit the fuse. BLM, 12 years later, poured gas on it and the CRTers brought the oxygen.
Anyways, here is what Imprimis had as an adaptation from Rufo’s (who has become one of the nation’s greatest opponent’s of CRT) speech at Hillsdale College (and being a subscriber, I heartily suggest that you become one as well – here). Emphasis mine, a bit of reformatting:
**************
Critical Race Theory: What It Is
Critical race theory is fast becoming America’s new institutional orthodoxy. Yet most Americans have never heard of it—and of those who have, many don’t understand it. It’s time for this to change. We need to know what it is so we can know how to fight it.
In explaining critical race theory, it helps to begin with a brief history of Marxism. Originally, the Marxist Left built its political program on the theory of class conflict. Marx believed that the primary characteristic of industrial societies was the imbalance of power between capitalists and workers. The solution to that imbalance, according to Marx, was revolution: the workers would eventually gain consciousness of their plight, seize the means of production, overthrow the capitalist class, and usher in a new socialist society.
During the 20th century, a number of regimes underwent Marxist-style revolutions, and each ended in disaster. Socialist governments in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia, Cuba, and elsewhere racked up a body count of nearly 100 million of their own people. They are remembered for their gulags, show trials, executions, and mass starvations. In practice, Marx’s ideas unleashed man’s darkest brutalities.
By the mid-1960s, Marxist intellectuals in the West had begun to acknowledge these failures. They recoiled at revelations of Soviet atrocities and came to realize that workers’ revolutions would never occur in Western Europe or the United States, where there were large middle classes and rapidly improving standards of living. Americans in particular had never developed a sense of class consciousness or class division. Most Americans believed in the American dream—the idea that they could transcend their origins through education, hard work, and good citizenship.
But rather than abandon their Leftist political project, Marxist scholars in the West simply adapted their revolutionary theory to the social and racial unrest of the 1960s. Abandoning Marx’s economic dialectic of capitalists and workers, they substituted race for class and sought to create a revolutionary coalition of the dispossessed based on racial and ethnic categories.
Fortunately, the early proponents of this revolutionary coalition in the U.S. lost out in the 1960s to the civil rights movement, which sought instead the fulfillment of the American promise of freedom and equality under the law. Americans preferred the idea of improving their country to that of overthrowing it. The vision of Martin Luther King, Jr., President Johnson’s pursuit of the Great Society, and the restoration of law and order promised by President Nixon in his 1968 campaign defined the post-1960s American political consensus.
But the radical Left has proved resilient and enduring—which is where critical race theory comes in.
WHAT IT IS
Critical race theory is an academic discipline, formulated in the 1990s, built on the intellectual framework of identity-based Marxism. Relegated for many years to universities and obscure academic journals, over the past decade it has increasingly become the default ideology in our public institutions. It has been injected into government agencies, public school systems, teacher training programs, and corporate human resources departments in the form of diversity training programs, human resources modules, public policy frameworks, and school curricula.
There are a series of euphemisms deployed by its supporters to describe critical race theory, including “equity,” “social justice,” “diversity and inclusion,” and “culturally responsive teaching.” Critical race theorists, masters of language construction, realize that “neo-Marxism” would be a hard sell. Equity, on the other hand, sounds non-threatening and is easily confused with the American principle of equality. But the distinction is vast and important. Indeed, equality—the principle proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence, defended in the Civil War, and codified into law with the 14th and 15th Amendments, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965—is explicitly rejected by critical race theorists. To them, equality represents “mere nondiscrimination” and provides “camouflage” for white supremacy, patriarchy, and oppression.
Sidenote: Because anything that is “not Marxist” approved MUST, by their definition, always be nefarious in nature and must be fought. Or at least, that’s what they say. Me? The Marxist race-baiters, like any Marxist, must have a scapegoat so they’ve turned on of America’s Pillars of Our Republic, Equality, to be the worst of the worst and MUST be defeated. Any American idea must be turned inside out and denigration and despair heaped upon it. -Skip
In contrast to equality, equity as defined and promoted by critical race theorists is little more than reformulated Marxism. In the name of equity, UCLA Law Professor and critical race theorist Cheryl Harris has proposed suspending private property rights, seizing land and wealth and redistributing them along racial lines. Critical race guru Ibram X. Kendi, who directs the Center for Antiracist Research at Boston University, has proposed the creation of a federal Department of Antiracism. This department would be independent of (i.e., unaccountable to) the elected branches of government, and would have the power to nullify, veto, or abolish any law at any level of government and curtail the speech of political leaders and others who are deemed insufficiently “antiracist.”
One practical result of the creation of such a department would be the overthrow of capitalism, since according to Kendi, “In order to truly be antiracist, you also have to truly be anti-capitalist.” In other words, identity is the means and Marxism is the end.
An equity-based form of government would mean the end not only of private property, but also of individual rights, equality under the law, federalism, and freedom of speech. These would be replaced by race-based redistribution of wealth, group-based rights, active discrimination, and omnipotent bureaucratic authority. Historically, the accusation of “anti-Americanism” has been overused. But in this case, it’s not a matter of interpretation—critical race theory prescribes a revolutionary program that would overturn the principles of the Declaration and destroy the remaining structure of the Constitution.
**********
Rufo certainly says it better than I ever could. There’s a couple more parts to this coming tomorrow.
Which reminds me – I haven’t heard from Janice Starkey yet. Time to call her manager.
(H/T: Powerline)
