Rep Debra Altschiller Lied - Let Her Prove That SB154 Does What She Says It Does - Granite Grok

Rep Debra Altschiller Lied – Let Her Prove That SB154 Does What She Says It Does

If I did it to an R, you can be sure I’m going to a D as well – especially Rep. Debra Altschiller (D-Stratham) for spouting complete nonsense about the bill. I guess she’s with NH State Rep. Sandra Keans (R, now D).

I don’t try to justify anything by the Constitution, it’s not my job and I don’t want to do it”.

Especially this part:

[Art.] 2-a. [The Bearing of Arms.] All persons have the right to keep and bear arms in defense of themselves, their families, their property and the state.

What else would you expect from someone that values First Amendment Rights (and NH’s Constitution Article 22 and 30) that happily would deny Free Speech Rights of others (being a sponsor of HB1159)?  She’s having a hissy fit because the Republicans learned about Sanctuary Cities and nullifying Presidential Executive Order that Democrats did during Trump’s Administration – how DARE the Live Free or Die State reject “moderate” Biden’s impending Executive Orders that will “infringe” on our Right to keep and bear arms?

“The New Hampshire Republicans are neither clever nor original in their efforts to nullify efforts the federal government is finally making to curb the bloodshed of gun violence in our country.”

Sorry, deary, it isn’t gun violence – it’s gun CRIME where bad-hearted / mentally ill use guns for their nefarious means (and no we law-abiding citizens). You’re the wife of the Seacoast newspaper magnate – all kinds of things are used to commit CRIMES – at least be honest about the classification.

We’d all take you a bit more seriously if you dropped the euphemism that is really at stake: complete civilian disarmament (see the Constitution quote above).

Yet, I haven’t heard ONE WORD from Debra Altschiller that the Democrat-run areas should have dropped their resistance concerning President Trump’s Executive Orders?  My, aren’t we being one-sided and hypocritical, eh Debra?

And remember, Democrats pulled this stunt first. Deal with it or renounce it (and get your other ideological kindred to do the same).

So, where do the lies start?  Here – just compare what she said:

Altschiller said SB 154 would prevent local law enforcement or state police from cooperating with federal agencies in any investigation of crimes involving gun violence.

“If SB 154 passes, we cannot get help from the FBI if a mass shooting happens here. The rise of armed white supremacy groups, anti-government extremists in New Hampshire and the virtual free-for-all the gun lobby is having in the Republican-run legislature is alarming and a real threat to our safety,” Altschiller said.

So let’s fisk what she wants you to believe, shall we?

  • would prevent local law enforcement

No such thing and the bill’s text is QUITE clear that it prevents law enforcement from cooperating with Presidential Executive Orders. It says NOTHING that if such a tragedy happened here (like on the gun-free fire zones created by the left on college campuses) that NH couldn’t ask for help.

I DEFY her, with the bill’s text below, to explain her assertion. Go ahead, Debra – prove me wrong.

She won’t be able to.

  • we cannot get help from the FBI if a mass shooting happens here.

Again, this bill is the OPPOSITE of what she wants us to believe. It prevents the Feds from asking NH Law Enforcement to enforce a Presidential Executive Order dealing with arms infringements. There is NOTHING there about NH asking for help.

And she knows, if she has learned anything from being in politics these many years, that Executive Orders ONLY apply to the Federal Government Executive Branch. Period. She just is desirous of a Unitary President acting like an Elected King. You know, like how NH Governor Chris Sununu has acted over this last year (e.g., COVID KING who can trump ANYTHING!).

Go ahead, Debra – prove me wrong.

She won’t be able to.

This next one will be easy as it is just the latest in a long list of Lefty talking points:

  • rise of armed white supremacy groups, anti-government extremists in New Hampshire

Let’s be clear – the Dems called EVERYONE in the TEA Party extremists. ANYONE that said that a smaller Government was better was an extremist.

We are labeled as extremists because we believe what the Founders believed and refusing to believe what Marx thought best – no separation between Government and Individuals – just one big miserable Group.

And we can tell that she’s all in on Critical Race Theory because if you aren’t a true believer that all Whites are RAAACIST and Oppressors, you’re a White Supremacist.

Lastly, I’m betting that she can’t tell us how many “militia” groups where were in NH in each of the last 10 years. It’s merely a soon-to-be expired Democrat / Socialist talking point.

I looked – using the Democrat’s most favorite purveyor of mistruths to keep the bucks rolling in, The Southern Poverty Legal Center’s Hate Map (eww, I have to take a shower after going there).

  • 2000 – zero hate groups
  • 2005 – two hate groups
  • 2010 – five hate groups
  • 2015 – six hate groups
  • 2020 – six hate groups

Those aren’t militias – just groups that disagree with the SPLC. Believe in traditional one man/one woman marriages? You’re a hate group.

Believe in the tenets of traditional Christian theology? You’re a hate group.

Want to limit immigration or restrict open borders? You’re a hate group.

But if ANYONE was going to know about militias here in NH, it would have been Granite State Progress. I looked at their site – no listing at all. Pfft!

I can only guess that Altschiller just has to say SOMETHING outrageous to get someone to listen.

Go ahead, NH State Rep Debra Altschiller – PROVE your assertion that there are militias here in NH and show us that rise – how many for each year since 2000 since you just made the baseless claim. Go ahead, Debra – prove me wrong.

She won’t be able to.

Here’s the entirety of HB154’s text and I’ve bolded the points I listed above. I’ve also listed, in Marxist Red, all of the parts that that prove her smear:

AN ACT prohibiting the state from enforcing a Presidential Executive Order that restricts or regulates the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

1  New Chapter; Presidential Executive Orders Relating to the Right to Keep and Bear Arms.  Amend RSA by inserting after chapter 159-D the following new chapter:




159-E:1  Presidential Executive Orders Relating to the Right to Keep and Bear Arms.

Pursuant to the general court’s authority under Part II, Article 5 of the New Hampshire constitution, no person acting under color of state law or as an agent of the state may take any action, expend any funds, or exercise any power of the state of New Hampshire to enforce any Executive Order of the President of the United States, issued after January 20, 2021, that has the purpose or effect of restricting, limiting, encumbering, regulating, or placing conditions upon the right of the people to keep and bear arms pursuant to the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and Part I, Art. 2-a and Art. 24 of the New Hampshire constitution.  This provision expressly extends protection to firearms, firearms components, firearms magazines and loading devices, ammunition, firearms supplies, knives, and any other weapons or armaments not prohibited by state law.

2  Effective Date.  This act shall take effect upon its passage.

So what’s the over / under that she’ll recant and admit that she lied?

And what else does she lie about? Progressives do it all the time.

(H/T: InDepthNH)