This:

One of the so-called “tough anti-abortion bills” is Senator Ben Sasse’s Born Alive Abortion-Survivors Protection Act. It has nothing to do with preventing abortions:
There is nothing in the #bornalive bill that is about abortion. "Nothing! It's about infanticide. That's the actual legislation..
You can't defend the indefensible. We're talking about killing babies that are actually born." @sensasse pic.twitter.com/ZH0duMW44e— Family Research Council (@FRCdc) February 25, 2020
DiStaso … arguably the FAKEST of New Hampshire’s #FakeNews … the man who Ray Buckley called his “go to guy” (per Steve Vaillancourt) … engages in the same euphemisms that Shaheen and the Senate Democrats use to normalize infanticide.
A coincidence? Of course NOT. It happens over and over and over again. DiStaso in his “article” also repeats Shaheen’s disingenuous argument … fair to call it propaganda … that the Born Alive act is unnecessary:
Here is Senator Sasse’s response, which of course did NOT make it into DiStaso’s article:
Active infanticide is illegal under federal law. What the Senate is considering today is passive #infanticide.
Every baby dies if you wander away from them & deny them care. "Passive infanticide is not illegal under federal law. That's what this legislation is about." @sensasse pic.twitter.com/LdNhnH55io— Family Research Council (@FRCdc) February 25, 2020
Jeannie Shaheen’s support for passive-infanticide is depraved and her claim that passive-infanticide is already illegal under federal law is untrue.
Yeah, DiStaso’s article contains a few quotes from Republicans. But nowhere does he make clear that Shaheen is supporting the killing of newborns through deliberate neglect … or that passive-infanticide is NOT already illegal under federal law. It’s only the appearance of balance, which makes it even more clear that DiStaso is a Democrat mouthpiece not a real reporter.