There is an Article by Ryan Saavedra at DailyWire.com about Democrat presidential candidate Buttigieg. In the Sunday exchange, Buttigieg is refusing to tell a Democrat voter her pro-life views were welcome in the party.
This is from the reporting of the Daily Wire. It is Buttigieg stating the party position about abortion during a Fox News town hall event.
From the exchange:
Kristin Day, an audience member told Buttigieg, “I am a proud pro-life Democrat… So, do you want the support of pro-life Democrats, pro-life Democratic voters? There are about 21 million of us, and if so, would you support more moderate platform language in the Democratic Party to ensure that the party of diversity and inclusion really does include everybody?”
The Buttigieg response, “Well I respect where you’re coming from and I hope to earn your vote, but I’m not going to try to earn your vote by tricking you… I am pro-choice and I believe that a woman ought to be able to make that decision. I know that the difference of opinion that you and I have is one that we have come by honestly and the best that I can offer, and it may win your vote, and if not, I understand, the best I can offer is that if we can’t agree on where to draw the line, the next best thing we can do is agree on who should draw the line and in my view it’s the woman who’s faced with that decision in her own life.”
Fox News host Chris Wallace interjects: “This is an interesting moment because President Trump spoke at the March to Life movement, he was the first president ever to actually appear at the March to Life movement, and I’m curious, Kristin, were you satisfied with the answer you got for the mayor?”
Day responds, “I was not because he did not answer the second part of my question and the second part was: the Democratic platform contains language that basically says that we don’t belong, we have no part in the party, because it says abortion should be legal up to nine months, the government should pay for it, and there’s nothing that says that people have who diversity of views on this issue should be included in the party… In 1996 and several years after that, there was a language in the Democratic platform that said that we understand that people have very differing views on this issue, but we are a big tent party that includes everybody and so therefore we welcome you, people like me, into the party so we can work on issues that we agree on… So my question was would you be open to language like that in the Democratic platform that really did say that our party is diverse and inclusive and we want everybody?”
Buttigieg replies, “Well I support the position of my party, that this kind of medical care needs to be available to everyone, and I support the Roe vs. Wade framework that holds that early in pregnancy there are very few restrictions and late in pregnancy there are very few exceptions, and again the best I can offer is that we may disagree on that very important issue and hopefully we will be able to partner on other issues.”
Conclusion
This is a frank exchange. It is also an instructive one. The Democrat Party is becoming increasingly strident in the way it expresses its positions. It is less and less tolerant of divergence from the party dogma of the leadership.
It used to be that Democrats would debate anything and everything. Today it is “fall in line or get the hell out.” Just think about it The times they are a-changing. It may be your views are not welcome in the Democrat Party. When was the last time you checked?