Back in late October, the town clerk in Hanover, New Hampshire, made the news. According to The Dartmouth, the college campus newspaper, she said a new residency law does not impede the voting process for college students. But in a court filing to overturn the law, she is confused.
Related: Federal Judge Refuses to Block New Hampshire’s New Voter Residency Law
If you missed yesterday’s installment of First in the Nation Primary Election theater, at no point in the history of the state since the voting age was set at 18 has the voting process for college students changed or been impeded. We’ve had absentee ballots in some form since the 1860s (not sure when New Hampshire started using them). So, anyone ‘away from home’ has had their right to vote (or not to vote) protected for over 150 years.
Nothing is confusing about it unless the word confusing is your “branding” slogan, which for vote-stealing Democrats, it is!
Branding is how the left markets its stupid ideas to large groups of herd animals. A similar example would be Climate Alarmists. To facilitate the economic surrender of the masses to top-down centralized planners (socialism), they market their fake crises through branding. Global Cooling became Global Warming became Climate change, climate crisis, climate chaos, and now Climate Collapse.
It’s not confusing at all if you understand they are lying to you in pursuit of political power.
Every child must attend a liberal university to be indoctrinated as a social justice warrior. A protector of the Leftist death cult, but do not expect them to understand how to vote by mail. They are too stupid and easily confused, like the young Wildebeest in the wilderness program which runs the wrong way and ends up a meal for the vote suppressing lions.
But just in New Hampshire. No other state has this problem. Ours are confused.
We’re they like that when they arrived or did the confusion set in after democrat activists and campus culture tried to tell them not to vote absentee to the address on the college application that made them ineligible for in-state tuition?
The Hanover Clerk
The clerk in Hanover is a prominent member of the League of Women Voters Vote Stealers and party to the lawsuit to overturn the law they claim is confusing. After multiple media reports, NH Secretary of State Bill Gardner wrote to the Hanover clerk to try and straighten the matter out.
No student will be prevented from voting whether they are domiciled or reside here legally or not. But the lawsuit still proceeds. Why? Because of its potential to prevent students who know they were never going to declare New Hampshire as their home from stealing your vote and electing Democrats.
If they vote here, they are saying (just like in every other state) that they live here. If they live here, they get a NH license and register their car just like all the other voting residents if a student does not want to do that, they can vote absentee to the address on their out of state license.
It’s only confusing if you make it that way. Democrats like the Hanover Clerk are coordinating their messaging with the state party, and the media has given them a platform for the confusion narrative.
You don’t need to be a college student to grasp how simple this is. If you are a visiting student, vote absentee back home. If you are declaring yourself a New Hampshire resident by voting here, then change your license and vehicle registration like the rest of us. And remember to make sure you demand in-state tuition rates twelve months after (if available) – you will have earned the savings.
Note: The university may act confused when you ask for in-state tuition. We’ll cross that bridge if and when you come to it.
Twitter | @MRSRedVoteR
