Congressional Democrats Suddenly Don’t Want “Collusion” Documents Declassified

by
Steve MacDonald

Democrats have been demanding transparency. When the recent FISA application was released with redactions at least a few of them are said to have claimed that there were more damning details under those redactions.

I guess that’s true.

When Mr. Trump approved the declassification of some of those documents last week, Congressional Democrats lined up to stop it.

(HotAir) Leading congressional Democrats are looking to stall the process to release documents related to the Russia investigation, which President Donald Trump ordered declassified on Monday.

Reps. Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff and Sens. Chuck Schumer and Mark Warner, sent a letter Tuesday asking Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, FBI Director Christopher Wray and Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats to provide an “immediate briefing” to the Gang of Eight before declassifying and releasing the documents…

The narrative the Left has been building in anticipation of this is that the declassification of details related to the Mueller investigation could undermine (something-something).

Seriously?

The Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, used an unsecured server to handle a significant sum of classified traffic via email with an unknown number of unclassified individuals gaining access, including the Chinese government, which stole everything that moved through that network.

The FBI has been leaking classified information to the press and passing details across unsecured devices.

At least one Senate Staffer has been arrested for sharing classified documents with the press – an 82-page FISA warrant used (properly) to reinforce the collusion narrative and support the Mueller witch hunt. (The same document -I believe – that Trump is allowing to be declassified.)

House Democrats employed “IT specialists” with ties to Pakistan who compromised their network and tried to flee the country.

Democrat Sen. Dianne Feinstein employed a Chinese spy as a driver for years.

The Obama administration allowed third-party contractors long-term access to the NSA surveillance database – that special place where Obama’s Intelligence community kept records on all the Allies and Americans (including on members of the press) on whom the government spied. Contractors whom it is believed were compiling “dossiers” on all the Republican candidates for President in 2016.

There’s no shortage of declassification of secrets going on here, so this sudden concern for national security seems fortuitous; yes, declassifying these documents does present a risk of exposing assets. Deep-State Demcrat party colluders who used illegally obtained surveillance to fabricate narratives for partisan political purposes.

That is why Mr. Trump un-redacting a few pages of one-FISA application and a few texts between individuals who have already been revealed to have been using their Government jobs to illegally go after candidate and then President Trump is a “brazen abuse of power” aimed at undermining the special counsel’s investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government.”

Exposure will reveal the media narrative to be a lie and the Mueller “investigation” for what it is; a stalling tactic to muddy the water until a Blue Wave can wash it all away.

The Democrats in power used Government force to affect the outcome of an election. They are using it to hide the partisan political collusion.

If that’s not true, then we should at least prosecute the alleged leakers who for years have been illegally releasing the same material and putting our security assets at risk.

The same people involved in the alleged partisan political collusion.

Author

  • Steve MacDonald

    Steve is a long-time New Hampshire resident, blogger, and a member of the Board of directors of The 603 Alliance. He is the owner of Grok Media LLC and the Managing Editor of GraniteGrok.com, a former board member of the Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire, and a past contributor to the Franklin Center for Public Policy.

Share to...