Theft by “unauthorized taking” is a class B Felony in New Hampshire. If you’ve got a prior record of redistributing property without “authorization” you’ll probably go to jail for an even longer time. And that is what will most likely happen to redistributionist Anthony Villegas, 55, of 26 Scripture S. He was out with O.P.P, other peoples….property, lacking the politicians protection of a legislative writ or state statute.
Yes, the defining difference between what Mr. Villegas is being charged with and what the Democrat party does with government, or what the #Occupy movement would like them to do with government, is that Anthony did not have the power of the general court to justify his taking.
There is one other difference of course.
Mr. Villegas is charged with possession of stolen property from a burglary. Burglary is the (sometimes) clandestine act of removing property that does not belong to you. When elected Democrats separate you from your property it is called revenue (instead of evidence), and would be more properly defined as robbery; separating someone from their property under threat of force. That force being the power of the police state to deny you of your property, liberty, freedom, and even your life, if you try to prevent it.
For those who have not been paying attention that is what the #Occupy New Hampshire movement and its Democrat party backers want, they want laws to justify state sanctioned robbery. And they are misleading people into supporting a class war that will empower the government to do what no banker or corporation could ever do. They want you to let them commit lawful takings of your property under threat of force, to fund whatever it is they desire.
We used to call that slavery. Now we are supposed to call it justice.
Photo Credit: Nashua Telegraph Courtesy of the Nashua Police Department.
