A comment was made that the proposed bill(s) in NH concerning the repeal of Gay Marriage or that the State would not be involved in marriage at all:
*****
The obvious problem is that many disagree that gay marriage is marriage from the traditional standpoint (and history). I agree with the notion that by getting the State "out of marriage", it is merely hiding from the issue – it doesn’t solve the problem. In fact, it can make it worse. The idea was that Govt only sanctions civil unions and not marriage still allows the problem to fester in the social arena – anyone can call anything that they want a marriage.
By slinking away, the State also punts on the next issue – why should civil unions only be between two people?
The moral authority in this country has been its Judeo-Christian background and philosophy (like it or not). This has been the underlying modus operandi for much of our legal system. The problem is, once that is removed, what is to prevent ANYTHING else from filling that vacuum? To this point, the gays have said "two" is the limiting factor but gender is irrelevant. This goes against almost any religious doctrine that is mainstream Western.
If you remove the religious aspect, WHY stop at two? I believe it to be…