Skip

An observation specifically about the writing of the Obamacare Law:

…So that’s what happened: in between the “conceptual language” and the actual legislative text, some experts who were writing the law thought it was a good idea to try to coerce states into creating their own exchanges by withholding tax subsidies from the federal exchanges. The actual legislators who voted on the legislation didn’t know how the law would work, but they trusted the experts they hired….

…Tom Carper (D-Delaware), who also served on the Senate Finance Committee,insisted that the legislative language wasn’t important:

“I don’t expect to actually read the legislative language, because reading the legislative language is among the more confusing things I’ve ever read in my life.”

So, the Senate Finance Committee voted on “conceptual language” that established subsidies for exchanges without mentioning who those subsidies would apply to. They then hired experts, as Baucus said, who did intend for subsidies not to apply to federal exchanges, and those experts plainly wrote the law in the way that it wouldn’t apply to federal exchanges. Democratic leadership then refused to post the legislative text for people to read in an adequate time period before passing the law, and as a result, Congress voted on legislation that was written by people who, yes, intended for tax subsidies only to apply to state-established exchanges…

But that’s NOT the main problem. 

Read more

Ellen Kolb has been a guest on GrokTALK! several times and we’ve had a splendid time.  She also runs Leven for the Loaf – a solo blog that concentrates on issues surrounding the Right To Life.  She had the opportunity to interview former NH State Rep Jane Cormier who is now running for NH State Senate in District 16 (and GraniteGrok Approved!) – reposted here at the ‘Grok by permission:

Jane Cormier’s neighbors elected her to the state legislature in 2012. She earned the Republican nomination for the seat the hard way, defeating an incumbent. She did it as a political newcomer, in a year when many GOP candidates were clobbered. Not a conventional candidate, by any measure. Proudly pro-life, too.

This was no “stealth” candidate. Jane Cormier was (and is) right up front about who she is and what she believes. “Being outspoken, telling the truth, has no ‘R’ or ‘D’ attached,” she said to me when we spoke recently.

Read more

Like all politicians, NH State Senator Jeb Bradley sends out eblasts all the time.  Now that it is campaign season, everyone should be expecting a whole lot more from all the candidates.  So, why the title?  I think I know – and I believe that Bradley makes it glaringly obvious (reformatted, emphasis mine) in this eblast that came to my attention recently:

Dear Friends:

Today my Democrat opponent attacked me in a letter to the editor for standing by my pro-jobs, pro-taxpayer principles.

He attacked me for supporting business legislation requested by a large employer in Conway, for working for pension reform that reduces the unfunded pension liability and protects property taxpayers across NH, and for supporting more educational choice and opportunities for parents and students.

I am proud of my record.  I have led efforts to kill tax and fee increases introduced by the liberals the Senate,

Er, what about the HUGE tax increase that you just gave us? 

Read more

Our ancient pledge to live in a nation of laws means nothing if one party aids the executive in undermining those laws on a whim.

— (((≠))) (@ThomasHCrown) July 9, 2014

As I had put up here, yesterday was a significant day where two high Federal Courts came down in two diametrically opposite results :

• The DC Circuit Court of Appeals (acknowledged to be the #2 Court in the land) – upheld the Rule of Law as written; the IRS cannot give subsidies to those that enroll in an Obamacare policy while logged into a Federal site; ONLY in an Exchange that was set up by an individual State.
• The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals – upheld the Rule of Intent and not as the black and white words actually used in the statute.   Instead of sticking to the wording, those judges decided that they could go by the intent of the Democrat Party in writing of the Law.

  Read more

Mark Levin is a well known and fiery Conservative talk show host and author.  What is less well known is that he also heads up the Landmark Legal Foundation and it has an ongoing FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) lawsuit against the EPA for all materials that mentioned the delaying the release and enactment of regulations concerning CO2 “pollution” standards simply for political reasons: announcing them before the election might have changed the results of the election once the general public learned of the draconian decrees and how it would affect them and their families.  We are now seeing the results – a larger and larger number of coal using electrical plants are being shut down due to the EPA using its regulatory power to institute a “cap and trade” system that Congress decided that it would not do.  How can a mere agency have the power to totally up end our lives when Congress decided that it shouldn’t?   But that is the Obama Administration, not just waiting, but IGNORING the other Branch of Government.  Or worse – deciding that he can be both the Legislative and Executive branches combined – a set up leading to tyranny.

The heads up from Instapundit that Levin is asking for sanction as it looks like the EPA, just like the IRS, has destroyed materials & emails that could have proven his assertions:

“Landmark Legal Foundation today asked Federal District Judge Royce Lamberth to sanction the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for destroying or failing to preserve emails and text messages that may have helped document suspected Agency efforts to influence the 2012 presidential election.”

The entire Presser is after the jump (emphasis and reformatting mine).  It is well worth to review the words of Thomas H Crown again:

Each agency will learn that there's no punishment — not even dreaded defunding! — for breaking the laws each officer is sworn to uphold.

— (((≠))) (@ThomasHCrown) July 9, 2014

Read more

And the last post with the last videos from this past Sunday’s home event at the McManus’s residence.  Here we have:

• Marilinda Garcia (candidate for the NH GOP nomination for US Congress, CD-2)
• Jim Adams (candidate for the NH GOP nomination for NH Executive Council)
• Closing remarks (Jane Cormier, Susan Olsen)

Marilinda Garcia                                                     Jim Adams

Closing Remarks

Previous videos:  

Read more

From Daniel Horowitz, a reminder of what a horrible mess Dodd-Frank is.  Remember, the “Frank” part was Barney Frank, the uber Leftist Congressman from MA!

Here are some of the worst aspects:

Too Big to Fail: – Title I of the bill created a new permanent bailout regime, the Financial Stability Oversight Council.  This institution would vitiate the bankruptcy process and allow the government to take over any entity that it deems vital to the rest of the economy.  In other words, it consummates “too big to fail” as a permanent policy, the very policy this bill was supposed to fix.

Volcker Rule – The Volcker rule ostensibly prohibits regular banks from investing their own money by engaging in bond trading.  It also prohibits banks from holding more than a 3% stake in private equity funds.  Just this part of the bill is 300 pages long!  It will take hundreds of new Keynesian jobs just to enforce, interpret, and comply with the rule.

CFPB – The bill created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFBP), which will limit the choices of consumers in financial markets, making it harder and more expensive to obtain credit.  This unaccountable agency will operate autonomously within the Federal Reserve and will not be subjected to congressional appropriations or oversight.  It is essentially the “death panel” of the financial sector, with control over bank accounts, mortgages, and student loans.

Read more