If you are going to wage war, WAGE WAR!

An adaption from that old saw of “If you are going to kill the King, KILL THE KING!” – do the deed and do it quick or the King WILL retaliate and will do it at the price of your life (and those that helped, and perhaps with a few others thrown in a la “will no one rid me of this troublesome priest?“).  Here we see the country of Jordon, whose 26 year old pilot was captured by ISIS, waging war – no pattycake in the future of the ISIS prisoners they hold:

‘Kill our pilot and we’ll execute ALL your prisoners’: Jordan ‘says it will hang its ISIS captives’ if airman hostage is dead

Jordan has threatened to fast-track the execution of a would-be suicide bomber the Islamic State is trying to free if the terror group kills its captured pilot, it was reported today. The government has apparently warned that Sajida al-Rishawi and other jailed ISIS commanders would be ‘quickly judged and sentenced’ in revenge for Muath al-Kaseasbeh’s death.

Read more

What WILL Senator Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) do? Will she confirm someone who values Bureaucracy over Congress?

KellyAyotteSittingSteve put up the video of Ted Cruz interviewing Obama’s nominee to replace Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch.  I listened to it and was amazed at how much “no answer’ answers the nominee can get away with.  And as the commenters to his post agher here. Paul Mirengoff of Powerline was live-blogging the Loretta Lynch hearing today and wrote this on Senator Vitter’s questions – and it caught my eye (reformatted, emphasis mine):

Vitter asks for the statutory basis for having the decisions on deportation made by DHS when the statute says its to be made by DoJ. Lynch won’t answer.  Vitter turns to mandatory minimums. They are in the statute, so why shouldn’t they be enforced whether we agree with them or not? Lynch cites limited resources and the need to prioritize.  But, as Vitter says, this makes the mandatory minimums non-mandatory and allows bureaucrats to override Congress.

This is the defining characteristic of Holder’s lawless reign at DoJ. And in no instance today has Lynch shown any discomfort with it. Indeed, as just occurred in response to Vitter, she has embraced it.

How many Republican Senators will accept this lawlessness by voting to confirm Lynch? The answer, it appears, is more than enough to confirm Lynch.

As a former NH AG, Kelly Ayotte was appointed twice to enforce The Law.

Read more

Data Point – Everytown and Moms Demand Action are missing the real targets

chalk outline

Like all good Progressives, the fronts for former NYC mayor (and billionaire) Bloomberg called Everytown and Moms Demand Action have no compunction about screaming for Government to take everyone’s guns away – the quintessential Progressive tactic of punishing everyone for the sins of the few.  They go after Joe Six-pack – the guys and gals that are law abiding that simply wish to use their Second Amendment Right.  For the former, it is only about guns, for the latter, it IS about the Constitution.  Thus, there is no compromise for truth be told, the Bloomberg astro-turf groups will always find one more reason to not stop and say “this is enough” for like most Progressives (re: taxes), there is never enough in and for their demands.  We know the ideology reigns supreme because we HARDLY here them speak about this kind of gun violence.  From the LA Times piece talking about violence – gang violence:

Violence tied to gangs remained the leading motive for homicides in L.A., at 160 killings, or about 62% of the city’s total — up from 145 such killings in 2013. The LAPD’s 77th Street Division saw a 59% increase in gang-related homicides (16 more killings) compared with 2013, which Beck attributed to a couple of “strong gang conflicts.”

Street killings are linked to gang violence, Beck said, which can help explain why more than half (about 53%) of the city’s homicides occurred on a street or sidewalk.

If we could eliminate gang homicides, 

Read more

But Obama said the same thing – look what that got us

In today’s Granite Status was this piece about what the Warren B. Rudman Center wants: Bringing campaigning back to the living room (reformatted, emphasis mine):

The executive director of the Warren B. Rudman Center is working to crystallize some of what makes the New Hampshire Primary so special in a series of public forums.
The ingredients: Ideas, access and engaging, close conversations with leaders.  “People are craving facts and some sense of civil discourse,” Broderick says.

I don’t see this as a big surprise.  What did surprise me was near the end of the article was this piece of pablum pie-in-the-sky:

Snowe, the author of “Fighting for Common Ground: How We Can Fix The Stalemate in Congress,” said at the Rudman Center that Republicans and Democrats need to spend more time working across the aisle and less time working the donor phonebanks.

Snowe, the author of “Fighting for Common Ground: How We Can Fix The Stalemate in Congress,” said at the Rudman Center that Republicans and Democrats need to spend more time working across the aisle and less time working the donor phonebanks.  “I think we have to jettison the red and blue state approach and unite under the red, white and blue because that’s what it’s about,” Snowe said. “It’s about the entire country.”

I have the same thing to say here that I said to someone in active in NH politics tonite concerning

Read more

Notable Quote – David Henderson

Markets teach or encourage at least three virtues: tolerance, honesty, and compassion. – David Henderson (author,  The Joy of Freedom: An Economist’s Odyssey)

First David Corn and now…..Nancy Pelosi????

You trust her with delivering your needs?
You trust her with delivering your needs?

When David Corn, a far Left Progressive writing at  Mother Jones, said that Mitt Romney was (in so many words) a closet Progressive, it left me rather unenthused. After all, a Progressive wanting Mitt – this is what I as a “base” Conservatarian, wants to hear about a guy that I resignedly voted for in the last election (more an anti-vote against Obama versus a throat rendering roar of approval for Mitt).  Extremely nice guy, successful guy, but one who leans more towards Big Government than what I’m comfortable at all with (the epitome of the “Big Government but just slower than the Democrats” kind of Establishment Republican).  And now, Nancy Pelosi???

Pelosi: I hope Romney is the GOP nominee

Mitt Romney has attracted an unlikely supporter in his possible 2016 White House bid: Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).  Asked if Romney has any shot at defeating Hillary Clinton in 2016, Pelosi told The Hill, “No, no. I mean, he might be a nice person — no offense, no offense — [but] let’s save you time.”. A smiling Pelosi added, “Let me put it this way — I hope he’s their nominee.”

Now obviously this could be a Brer Rabbit / briar patch moment – after all, the Democrats beat him the last time (and frankly, I think he beat himself the first time in the Primary).  Do they think

Read more

Speaking of Flip Flops, here’ssss Jeb Bush!

First and foremost we need to control our border.  A great nation needs to control its border.  Not just at the border, which is hugely important, but also the 40 percent of the people that have come here illegally came with a legal visa and overstayed their bounds.  We ought to be able to figure out where they are and politely ask them to leave.”

We need to use State and local enforcement.  State and local law enforcement should be a partner with the federal government to make this done effectively and in a “compassionate” way.

I don’t even know that that means – “ask”?  “Compassionate”?  “Partner”?  Sorry, but when you are using the phrase “law enforcement”

Read more

Freedom Caucus: er, I see an absent name…..again. Guess who!

This won’t make House Speaker John Boehner’s life any easier.

Nine of the most conservative House Republicans are forming a caucus to push policy further to the right, the group announced Monday.  The birth of the House Freedom Caucus reflects frustration among some that the Republican Study Committee, once the concentrated nerve center of the House GOP’s right wing, has ballooned in size and taken a less confrontational approach with GOP leaders than some of its members would like.

…The new Freedom Caucus is likely to take a more in-your-face stance with GOP leaders. Its aim is to promote “an agenda of limited, constitutional government in Congress,” the group said in a joint statement Monday.

This, too – what a concept! 

Read more

Excellence vs …. something else

Shot: they will normalize you downward because you are excellent:

Words of Wisdom from Mike Pannone

Chaser: they will normalize you upward simply because…er, I’m just shaking my head:

A Tennessee school district has voted to set the minimum failing grade in its high schools at 60 percent, making it easier for students to pass.

Read more

Global Warming? Er, it might be the Big Chill if this happens

Seabrook Station

Big Chill indeed – no power during a major blizzard?

“The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is putting out word that 17 nuclear power stations, with a total of 26 reactor units, could shut down if the historic blizzard smashing into the East Coast carries high winds, as expected.  “If wind speeds are in excess of specified limits, a plant would have to shut down,” said the NRC, without specifying those limits for the 17 plants.

The agency called the storm “the most potent” of the year that “could produce prodigious amounts of snow, hurricane-force winds and dangerous travel conditions.” Many are in the direct path of the storm. In New York, for example, the two Indian Point units are just 24 miles north of New York City. In Massachusetts, Pilgrim 1 is in Plymouth, 38 miles southeast of Boston.

And of course, just north of Boston is Seabrook Station here in NH.  That’s a whole lotta megawatts that will go

Read more

And we wonder why they are spineless?

“Attention Congressman Gosar! You took an oath about protecting the Constitution. Remember? Amazing short video that reveals what Congress really thinks about the Constitution.

He doesn’t get off the hook however without being informed in no uncertain terms why  Liberty must be supported.”

The most telling part are the couple of interactions with Congressman Gosar (R-AZ):

Congressman Gosar: Folks, be careful what you tread here because if all you’re going to do is stand just for the Constitution and nothing less, you will lose. We have to have the Constitution but a plan to get back.

Man: Why would they lose if they stood for the Constitution?

G: Because, because…

Man: Is it too far to go?

Read more

I understand why she did it but isn’t this just copycatting Democrat identity politics?

And we will LOSE every time that we ditch our principles and adopt them – even if it is just to show different shaped faces and skin colors.  From the UL (reformatted, emphasis mine):

Disparate Republicans by Shane CorcoranDuring the fever pitch of last year’s elections, one of Renee Plummer’s friends made an off-the-cuff comment about Republicans being a bunch of “old, white guys. “It was an “ah, hello” moment for this Republican businesswoman from Portsmouth.”Ah, you’re talking to me here,” she recalls responding. The exchange inspired Plummer to come up with her image of Republicans. Off the top of her head, she named a handful of Republicans who do not fit into that “old, white guy” stereotype.The project escalated quickly: Capture the five in a portrait photograph, and attire them each in jeans and a white shirt.

Each of the five, she said, understood her vision…”I think she hit the nail on the head,” said Stiles. “She shared the diversity within the party and the importance of diversity.

Sure, diversity is important – backgrounds, history et al.  But

Read more

Billionaire tells the rest of us “You don’t need that!”

Again, the “tells” that someone is a Progressive: You don’t need that I don’t know of anyone who says they need that It’s about the quality of life“ It is the cost of civilization Right. Jeff Greene, who owns 5 mansions and flies a private jet (family + nannies) to the elitist Davos meeting, has the … Read more

See, even President Obama believes Government regulations suck

From the UL:

President Obama has threatened to veto a bill that would require federal regulations to be cost-effective and receive more public input. He said it would be too burdensome on the federal government. This is not a story from the satirical news site “The Onion.”  The House passed the Regulatory Accountability Act last week

The Hill had more – the irony abounds:

“The Regulatory Accountability Act would impose unprecedented and unnecessary procedural requirements on agencies that would prevent them from efficiently performing their statutory responsibilities,” the White House said late Monday in a policy statement. “It would also create needless regulatory and legal uncertainty and further impede the implementation of protections for the American public.”

Well, golly – make businesses obey government regulations that have been imposed unprecedented and

Read more

Obama: your kids “only need” Community College – no need for better so I’ll take your savings

Harvard Diploma

  • You don’t need that
  • I don’t know of anyone who says they need that
  • It’s about the quality of life“
  • It is the cost of civilization

America has ALWAYS been an aspirational society: dream it, work for it…and sometimes, get it.  The moral has always been look up – there is the possibility of making it.  Not a guarantee, not a safe bet, but we have always told our children that it was possible; the American Dream.

But if you have listened to Obama, he’s always talked about reaching for the middle class – never higher.  All of his rhetoric has always about that “class” but never higher.  He’s always tried to change, to transform, that highest of aspirations – not to be your best, just average.  Just a person, like any other – not a superstar or a standout.  For you are the Little People, there is no “need” for better; to wit (reformatted, emphasis mine). And what better way to “nudge” that decision to lesser status than by deciding to take some of that “college” money away – Obama’s State of the Union “aspiration for more Federal Government money” is to tax Johnnie and Jamie’s formerly tax advantaged college fund

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said Friday that middle-class families concerned about President Obama’s plan to raise taxes on their college savings should just send their children to community college.

Not to strive for better, not to strive for more rigorous, not for more prestigious; just settle.  It fits in with the mantra – let government take care of you.  And if you do, there is no “need”

Read more

A more productive Senate already this year than last year?

From The Hill:

The new Republican-controlled Senate has already voted on more amendments in one week than the Democratic-controlled Senate considered in all of 2014.

Republican senators applauded the feat when Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) announced it on the Senate floor.

“We’ve actually reached a milestone here that I think is noteworthy for the Senate. We just cast our 15th roll-call vote on an amendment on this bill, which is more votes — more roll-call votes on amendments than the entire United States Senate [did] in all of 2014,” he said.McConnell made his announcement while colleagues were in the midst of churning through a batch of 10 amendments

Gosh, the only big differences I know of in the Senate are:

Read more

Fiscally unsound for WHO, Senator Jeff Woodburn?

Pay taxesThis caught my eye earlier this week in the Union Leader (reformatted, emphasis mine):

DOWN TO BUSINESS: Senate Democratic Leader Jeff Woodburn of Dalton likened a GOP effort to cut the business profits tax and business enterprise tax to “political footballs.”
[Senate GOP wants to lower NH business taxes].   Sen. Andy Sanborn, R-Bedford, and Senate Majority Leader Jeb Bradley, R-Wolfeboro, touted legislation to cut the BPT from 8.5 percent to 8 percent over four years, and cut the BET by 10 percent over three years, to reinforce New Hampshire as a business-friendly state.

Woodburn rebutted talk that the tax cuts would create more jobs and raise wages. With the state budget constraints, Woodburn says he would focus more on the argument that such bills are fiscally unsound.  “The pre-game is over and we’re ready to get on the field and get to work,” he said.

I will ask again – unsound for whom?

Read more

Share to...