Skip

Obama said,  “I think it is important for us to recognize the threat of violent extremism is not restricted to any one community. Here in the United States, we’ve all kinds of home grown terrorism. And tragically, recent history reminds how even a single individual can inflict horrendous harm on Americans. So our efforts to counter violent extremism must not target any one community, because of the patriotic Muslim Americans who are partners in keeping our country safe.”

He talks about religious freedom but his actions have defied his words when it comes to the US majority religion, Christianity? And once again we see him simply brush aside the attacks that Muslims have inflicted on American soil; it almost like he wants to whitewash history.  In fact, there are quite a few Muslim attacks going back a few decades:

Read more

we’d rather see the shards of the current Establishment on the floor than continue to see the shards of the broken promises and actions that the Republican Party is actually delivering.

I do have to say that there are a lot of Republicans not liking that Donald Trump has crashed their party of “The Party”. It has been hilarious, as well as very telling, to watch and listen to the howls of indignation of the Establishment Republicans and their coterie of consultants and commentariats invoke Reagan’s 11th Commandment even as they violate it themselves (consistency?).  Frankly, for a lot of them, this is beginning to become their Oz moment – the pulling away of the smoke and mirrors by a guy who just doesn’t give a crap what they think.  And as I, and a lot of others are saying, they hate the idea that their nuanced and calibrated politicalese messages, angles, and strategies are going down in flames more flamboyantly than the Hindenburg.

And I believe that they hate the idea that many of the Right body politic are nodding their heads in agreement when Trump says what he does – because these other chuckleheads won’t.  And when they lay in their broadsides, thinking that their screeds will shame him off the stage and put a sock in it, Trump is sidestepping and saying even more that shows the hypocriticalness.  Tit, tat, BOOM!

There is also the insider-outsider aspect to this – and Trump is playing this well (almost like he had a deck of marked cards) and Conservative Review has a nice take on it (emphasis mine):

…There is an answer to the “why” however.  An answer that speaks directly to both why Trump’s candidacy resonates – and the visceral nature of the opposition to him in some of these conservative quarters.

Read more

Paul Moreno over at American Spectator has a post whose title didn’t do all that much for me but the subtitle did:   Progressives succeeded where the Confederates failed.  While to most of the population, the Civil War was about slavery, it really was about differing interpretations of the Constitution.  And the desire to take those differing interpretations from a war of ideology and economics to a war of weapons.

The real battle, however, never stopped as the foreign political philosophy called Progressivism (really, just a rebranding from Socialism) moved from Europe to America and took over the role that the South had had in trying to subvert and make irrelevant our foundation as a nation.  Here are the ‘graphs that caught my eye (emphasis mine):

..The Civil War ended slavery and seemed to vindicate the principles of the Declaration, as Lincoln so ably articulated them in the Gettysburg Address. But it was only a few decades before a new generation, the “progressives,” renewed the war on the Declaration and succeeded where the Confederates failed. The progressives aspired to give America a European-style welfare state, and they knew that the principles of natural rights found in the Declaration and the Constitution stood in their way.

They also realized that religious beliefs and strong family bonds were impediments as well.  Ask yourself:

Read more

While I have a few folks that I am watching (and quite partial to one), I will have to say that I have not decided on The One for my expensive vote.  In the meantime, as these silly seasons get really boring, I am glad to see that the “anti-candidate” Donald Trump is just letting go.  What the rest of the field seems to not recognize is that there is a lot of anger in the right side of the Party.  They / me DO see our traditional country disappearing under the shoving that both the Hard Left Progressives are giving – and the Establishment / Ruling / Political class is giving it mere lip-service at best.  The latter couch their words in political correctness, triangulated with focus groups and hemmed in by that identity group vs another.

Translation: nuanced to the hilt to the point of being gibberish now and unaccountable later. 

Read more

Yes, I am the guy who called out the reporterette from the Daily Beast during the media panel during the 603 Alliance Grassroots Summit for not reporting the stories that really matter – just tell us the truth, unvarnished and without bias. Not the gotcha questions or the constant ambushes of politicians.  It’s a bit different, though, (reformatted,emphasis mine):

The short-lived senator from Massachusetts wants the world to know about his new weight-loss scheme via some very strange supplements. Last night, shirtless pictures of former Senator Scott Brown appeared in my inbox.

Read more

Steve’s post on the ludicrous position that the Press allowed themselves to be in (literally, in) by the Hillary campaign brought this thought to mind:

What, none of these dunces have an EDC setup that has sharp knife?  Or are they really that dull?

That would be Every Day Carry – stuff that you think you might need “just in case” when out of the house.  I carry a SOG jackknife – sharp sucker; would have cut that rope (probably just thin clothesline rope) in a single swipe.  But that’s beside the point.  A better question is:

Really, you lapdogs ALLOWED yourselves to look this stupid?  The Scoobie van episode wasn’t enough debasement for you?

This guy will be the butt of jokes and derision for years.  So why did they allow it to happen?

Read more

I just read this piece by Myron Magnet at National Review – a short history of why self-government was so important to our Founders.  What struck me after reading is how fragile our Liberty is even with the SO high of an expense with which it has been bought through the centuries.  Yes, we consider it our birthright – but even with payments already, it demands even more.  These are the most salient ‘graphs from the post (emphasis mine):

The Founders believed that the purpose of government was to protect life, liberty, and property from what they called the depravity of human nature— from man’s innate capacity to do the kinds of violence that slave-owners, to take just one example, did every day. But government, they recognized, is a double-edged sword. You arm officials with the power to protect you; but those officials have the same fallen human nature as everyone else, so who is to say that they won’t use that power to oppress you, as European governments had oppressed the colonists’ forebears? From Pharaoh to Nero to the Stuart kings, history teems with examples of such despotic governments. Even the democratic republic the Founders created had to be run by imperfect men, and thus even it could turn into what Richard Henry Lee called an elective despotism. So the second great Founding idea is this: The mere fact that you elect representatives to govern you is no sure-fire guarantee of liberty. Or, as Madison saw it in Federalist No. 10: Taxation with representation can be tyranny.

Even if it is done with the “best of intentions” – elective despotism is still tyranny if it oversteps it bounds in “helping people” by taking away others’ freedoms.

This danger worried the Founders constantly,

Read more

(re: Bluto).  From Andrew Klaven: “Cowboy Up, Conservatives – And Happy Fourth”

Recently I’ve been hearing a lot of conservatives saying things like, “It’s over. The left has won. This is no longer America. I’m not even going to celebrate the Fourth of July this year.” I confess this disturbs me. I expect feminists to squeal like hysterical little girls.

Second Kings, Chapter 6, contains one of my favorite Bible stories. The King of Aram (which was more or less Syria) is waging war against Israel. But every time he sets up an ambush, the prophet Elisha tips off the Israelites and they get away. Because Elisha is a prophet! So he knows what the Syrians are planning. Mightily ticked off, the Syrian king decides to take Elisha out. So he sends his army to surround the city of Dothan where Elisha is staying.

The next morning, Elisha’s servant steps outside, looks up and sees that the city is surrounded by Syrian horses and chariots. Panicked, he cries out to Elisha, “Oh no, my lord! What shall we do?”

The prophet answers calmly, “Don’t be afraid. Those who are with us are more than those who are with them.”

Read more