MACDONALD: Wife Beating In Joe’s Afghanistan

Did you hear the news? “Moderate” members of the Taliban, when not polishing the military hardware Joe left them for sale to our enemies (like China) so they can reverse engineer it, just made a progressive leap that has to have Dems dancing with people in inflated frog costumes.

The Telegraph apparently obtained the 60-page penal code – signed by the Taliban’s Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada (excuse me, allergies!) and distributed to courts across Afghanistan – which classifies wife-beating as discretionary punishment rather than a criminal act.

The law notes that a husband may strike his wife freely, but only provided the violence does not leave visible bone fractures or open wounds. Emphasis on visible

If someone dares to charge a husband, and it likely won’t be any other wife-beating Taliban Husband or any wife wanting to avoid another beating (can anyone tell through all that material?), the maximum sentence is fifteen days in jail.

Nice job, Joe. You abandoned these women to systemic domestic violence, and what’s worse, Democrat women made excuses for what Joe did to women who, by the way, are no longer allowed to get an education. But wait, there’s more. Under the same laws,

if a woman goes to her parents’ home without her husband’s permission – even to avoid a beating – she faces up to three months in prison, as do any family members who dare to shelter her.

Beating iyour wife is okay as long as you don’t break bones – visibly.

This is sad and tragic, but it offers an opportunity. Democratic women who defended the abrupt withdrawal and probably dismissed the lost American lives or handing military hardware to our enemies (or just any Democrat, really) should be put to the question.

Should Taliban men be able to beat transowman or would it be a violation of their rights to treat them like men?

I know, no Taliban dude would ever do anything but kill a trans woman on sight, assuming they could tell through the burka. That Fashiam, she is awfully tall for a woman, don’t you think? Beat her and see if she welps like a man.

Okay. Enough of that.

What are your thoughts about the new progressive Taliban law limiting how hard husbands can beat their wives?

Does it bother you that this is a result of Joe Biden’s abrupt and ill-advised withdrawal from the third world toilet (use your own words if that feels better).

Remember when Afghanistan was the good war? Democrats were all in on Obama’s surge despite the rules of engagement, making it little more than a way to reduce our fighting force, which Democrats hate, so that makes sense.

Then Joe pulls the plug, women lose their jobs, girls get kicked out of schools, return to their status as property, but hey, husbands can’t beat their wives to death anymore, at least not casually. They need a really good reason, and that’s progress.

Feel free to reach out to your local Handmaiden media outlet as well and see why they didn’t cover this tory form any angle.

Author

  • Steve MacDonald

    Steve is a long-time New Hampshire resident, an award-winning blogger, and a member of the Board of Directors of The 603 Alliance and the National Heritage Center for Constitutional Studies. He is the owner of Grok Media LLC and the Managing Editor, Executive Editor, assistant editor, Editor, content curator, and more (yes, there's more) at GraniteGrok.com. Steve is also a former board member of the Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire, the Republican Volunteer Coalition, and has worked for or with many state and local campaigns and grassroots groups, and is a past contributor to the Franklin Center for Public Policy.

    View all posts
Share to...