How power quietly shifts when no one’s watching
A mafia and a school board seem like total opposites. One rules through fear and secrecy; the other is supposed to represent voters in the open. But look more closely at how decisions are made, and a strange similarity emerges. In both cases, a small, organized group controls key information and decides who pays the price when things go wrong.
Claremont’s school district offers a real example. In 2025, it fell into a financial hole of about $5 million. Audits were years behind, staff were cut, and a $4 million loan was needed just to open schools. A local elementary school faced closure. The elected board was still “in charge” on paper, but the real power had already shifted elsewhere.
The thinkers who saw it coming
Gaetano Mosca, an Italian political theorist, said that every society is ruled by a small, organized minority. Their strength isn’t moral superiority—it’s coordination. “Ruling classes decline inevitably,” he wrote, “when they cease to find scope for the capacities through which they rose to power.”
Bertrand de Jouvenel, a French philosopher, described power as something that naturally expands, especially during crises. “Power changes its appearance but not its reality,” he warned. When things fall apart, people hand more control to whoever promises to fix the mess.
Together, they teach a simple lesson: follow the flow of money, information, and obedience. Whoever controls those things is the real sovereign.
What happened in Claremont
From 2019 to 2025, the Claremont School Board formally ran the district. But inside the system, control shifted to administrators who managed the books and reported the numbers.
By 2025, the district’s finances were so tangled that outside auditors couldn’t keep up. The board relied on rosy internal reports until the deficit exploded. When it did, the same insiders, along with lawyers, consultants, and a local bank, defined the options.
The fix, mass layoffs, canceled programs, and an emergency loan, was presented as the only path forward. The public never really consented; it was just told there was no choice.
Power’s quiet migration
Mosca would call this a textbook case of an “organized minority” maintaining rule even after failure. The administrators and advisers didn’t have to plot anything; they simply held the knowledge the board lacked.
Du Jouvenel would see an expanding Power using crisis to grow. The district promised “stability” in exchange for new debt and future tax payments. State officials soon proposed new oversight powers for local districts in trouble. Each step moved decision-making farther from voters.
That’s how sovereignty slips away, not with a coup, but with an accountant’s report, a lawyer’s memo, or a loan agreement written under pressure.
The limits of the Mafia comparison
No one is accusing Claremont’s school leaders of being criminals. The comparison is structural, not moral. The mafia collects tribute through fear; a bureaucracy collects it through paperwork. In both cases, the people paying don’t really have a say.
The key similarity is that both systems depend on control of information. Once you own the books, you own the decisions.
How to get power back
If voters want real control, they must reclaim visibility over money. That means:
- Public ledgers. Post cash balances and grant revenues monthly in plain English.
- Audit discipline. No new budget until the last year’s audit is complete and public.
- Financial expertise. Elect at least one board member who understands accounting.
These steps sound boring, but they’re revolutionary. They make it harder for small, unelected groups to turn public budgets into private fiefdoms.
The real lesson
Power rarely vanishes—it just moves. In Claremont, it migrated from voters to the board, from the board to administrators, and finally to lenders and state officials. The way to stop that drift isn’t outrage. It’s transparency.
If the community insists on open numbers, clear rules, and financially literate leadership, then the people paying the bills will once again be the ones giving the orders.
That’s the difference between a self-governing town and one that pays tribute, whether to mobsters or bureaucrats.
Authors’ opinions are their own and may not represent those of Grok Media, LLC, GraniteGrok.com, its sponsors, readers, authors, or advertisers.
Got Something to Say, We Want to Hear It. Comment or submit Op-Eds to steve@granitegrok.com
