When nature will not do what you’ve insisted, the classic response from the so-called planet-saving environmental activists is to simulate the disaster. This most often occurs on paper and in the media, where captured interests invent and then perpetuate fraud. Weather is pimped as proof because trends fail to support the theory. The other way is to take action. Arsonists, for example, are frequent fliers when it comes to wildfire outbreaks.
Concerned individuals try to derail trains carrying chemicals, set things on fire, and cause widespread chaos to draw attention to their issue, while “scientists,” and people pretending to be, have their crackpot thoughts elevated to reach as many people as possible.
Meanwhile, in the real world, the new media have done a respectable job of offering actual science, while sharing data from state and federal entities that the so-called climate experts ignore because it throws a wrench in their grift.
Pole Vaulting
Sea Ice was supposed to have vanished from the North Pole years ago, and a number of times since, but it refuses to do what the whackjobs tell it to do. The same is true for the ice mass on the South Pole, which, were it to melt, would raise sea levels (for real), a fear they have endlessly mongered, despite the pedestrian pace that tide gages measure, while wealthy liberals purchase beachfront.
It follows, given their theory, that the more water that gets trapped up in sea ice or on land in polar regions, the less likely their impending scenarios will happen, or that you’ve got anything to do with it. The other issue being sea ice, which can melt all it wants – it won’t change sea level at all, not that they ever admit this.
An analysis of summer sea ice areas in the West Arctic including the NW Passage by the Canadian government ,shows that ice area levels remain above average.
Summer sea Ice in the Arctic is greater this year than it was in 1981.
More ice doesn’t necessarily mean thick ice, so there’s plenty of room for debate. However, the ice isn’t supposed to be there at all, and if it is, as we roll into the winter months, it will only get thicker.
Contrast this with the caterwauling about record heat in Europe and here or there, above normal ocean temps, and you’ve got a fascinating contradiction. If we’re responsible for the latter, what’s the explanation for the former?
How can we be affecting the one thing and not the other, given your grand climate theory, which (when you are honest – typically after a few drinks) is to change the economic climate so that you have all the money and power, and we have to scrabble about fighting each other in the dark for the crumbs from your table?
Pro Tip: When your climate psychic never gets anything right, you should stop listening to them or giving them any money, even when it’s someone else’s. But we are happy to hear about the ice growth—even if you can’t explain it.
Unless, of course, someone wants to divert the requested sea wall money to Al Gore so he can hire a ship and buy a bunch of flamethrowers, assuming he hasn’t already tried that.
