Within I pick three topics upon which to discourse, but not worth a full-length examination as a standalone piece on their own. But first, reprising an older cartoon (for shameless self-promotion!):
(I did not realize just how painfully prescient this cartoon was given what we’re seeing.)
For my last cartoon see this post.
Note: I am a regular link contributor to Gates of Vienna and The Other McCain. Both have daily link collections plus good articles. And don’t forget Surak who is kind enough to post my essays as well as a part of his information-sharing effort. Here’s a chart from his latest weekly injection toll post:
How does anyone with three brain cells that talk with each other not look at this and see something is very, very wrong?
And one last HT to WRSA who also have started to post a sampling of my pieces.
>>>>>=====<<<<<
Cuing off an Epoch Times article (I subscribe and IMHO you need to as well) about Congresswoman Harshbarger introducing the ‘Natural Immunity is Real Act’…
“Too many medical leaders are refusing to publicly recognize what overwhelming data has already shown – protection afforded to individuals with natural immunity is real, robust and durable,” said Congressman Daniel Webster. “Denying science only contributes to existing confusion, misinformation, and mistrust among the American people. This bill helps restore trust and faith in the Public Health system, while maintaining our fight against COVID-19.”
From this I have a massive headache. It’s one of those things that I cannot wrap my mind around – the systematic ignoring of natural immunity. And while I can’t find the original link where I saw this a while ago, look here (bolding added; note you may need to translate this):
The phrase “herd immunity” has been around for decades, and most people had probably heard it at some point prior to March 2020. It had a clear meaning, which was available on (among other places) the World Health Organization’s website:
“Herd immunity is the indirect protection against an infectious disease that occurs when a population is immune, either by vaccination or by immunity developed through previous infection.”
However, after the shock of the “pandemic”, this once totally uncontroversial theory became the subject of fierce debate, and its proponents suddenly found themselves described as “genocidal” or, at the very least, irresponsible.
It was at this point that the WHO changed its website, updating its definition of “herd immunity” to eliminate the concept of “natural immunity” altogether:
“Herd immunity”, also known as “population immunity”, is a concept used for vaccination, where a population can be protected from a given virus if a vaccination threshold is reached. Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not exposing them to it.”
You can check the above version via the wayback machine.
So natural immunity is now no longer considered a thing, despite it having been a thing for decades. Why? To push The Jab. Why is this, and changing the definition of what a vaccine is, so inconsequential that people do not have even the slightest curiosity about this even when presented with evidence?
>>>>>=====<<<<<
I am a Trekkie. I was captivated by the original series with Captain Kirk, liked the Next Generation though found a lot of it a little syrupy with its near-utopia. Loved-loved-loved Deep Space Nine being far “grittier” and for the first couple of seasons enjoyed Enterprise but, as I split from Satan’s Favorite Daughter my first wife, lost interest. I haven’t really gotten into it since. But in seeing this:
I suddenly realized… who remembers the first movie, Star Trek: The Motion Picture, where the mega-artificial intelligence V’Ger is talking with Kirk, Spock, McCoy, etc., about the “carbon units infesting Enterprise”? And would that not tie in with the love of AI the globalists have?
Do not forget that they want to reduce you… by 7.3 billion. Also remember that 2015 NEW WORLD ORDER conference in which they said “many billions will need to die”. As Surak says, they really do want you dead.
The Talmud says “When someone comes to kill you, arise and kill him first”. To me, then, the only inhibition against this happening is merely legal and consequential – not moral – for I believe that by that intent they have forfeited any other protection.
Got your Personal Accountability List ready? Because I weep, but I foresee that the legal and consequential inhibitions are soon going to fall as well.
>>>>>=====<<<<<
The notable Peter Grant weighs in on something I’ve also been mentioned for a while – to wit, the deliberate destruction of America (underlining and bolding in original):
We’re now faced with a blatant reality that can no longer be hidden or denied. The current administration is actively seeking to destroy the fabric of American society and remake it in a radical, extremist image. The Biden administration and the progressive left of the Democratic Party embody and incorporate the teachings of Alinsky, Cloward and Piven to such an extent that they’ve replaced the constitution and the founding fathers as the foundation of their efforts.
I coined (I think) the term Marxianic Zeal and Marxianic Missionaries. As Peter points out:
We can’t ignore them and hope they’ll go away, because they won’t ignore us, and they won’t go away or rest until we’ve knuckled under to their demands and obeyed them.
Citing FrontPageMag founder David Horowitz:
(Link to AZ Quotes per their policy.)
>>>>>=====<<<<<
