Dope of the Week (Month? Year?): John “Loathesome” Kerry

Via Matt Drudge ======== . John Kerry addressing some college students, on education: if you make the most of it… You study hard. You do your homework and you make an effort to be smart… ah… you, you can do well. If you don’t, you get stuck in Iraq. This really needs no comment, as … Read more

The Forgotten Story: It’s the Economy, Stupid!

In this week’s radio address, President Bush talks about the economy. It is no secret that the economy is humming along at a pretty good clip at the moment and jobs are generally available to those who want to work. Additionally, opportunities abound for those with the entrepreneurial drive to make it on their own. All in all, for many people, these are good times. Funny though, we don’t hear much about any of this from the mainstream media these days. That’s because any good news might reflect kindly on the President, and of course, we couldn’t have that now, could we? If Clinton were the President, that’s all we’d be hearing 24/7- you know, the great "Clinton economy."
.
While I believe that it’s the people themselves that actually make this great economy work, there are actions engaged in by the federal government that can help it or hurt it. Luckily for us, President Bush’s policies are more about helping it by getting government out of the way of the forward motion of our industrious spirit. Oh- and these policies allow more of us to keep a larger portion of the fruits of our labor by paying less in taxes. On this, President Bush is spot-on. The President explains:
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. Election Day is around the corner, and one of the biggest issues at stake in this campaign is your taxes. Here is my philosophy: I believe that our economy grows and the American Dream reaches more citizens when you keep more of what you earn. With more money in your pocket, it is easier for families to afford a good education, it is easier for young people to afford the down payment on a home of their own, and it’s easier for small business owners to go out and invest and create jobs.
Amen! While President Bush isn’t much of a conservative when it comes to the size of government and how his administration prepares the budget, his aforementioned "philosophy" should be music to every conservative’s (and ordinary working American’s, for that matter) ears. But alas, we don’t hear it much these days, as the mainstream media focuses on all that they can to make Bush and the Republicans look bad. The President continues, explaining what’s been done to let us keep more of our hard-earned paychecks:
So my administration and the Republican Congress enacted the largest tax relief since Ronald Reagan was in the White House. We cut taxes for every American who pays income taxes. We doubled the child tax credit. We reduced the marriage penalty. We cut taxes on small business. We cut taxes on capital gains and dividends to promote investment and jobs. And to reward family businesses and farmers for a lifetime of hard work and savings, we put the death tax on the path to extinction.
.
Now the results of these tax cuts are in. The tax cuts we passed have left more than a trillion dollars in the hands of American workers, families, and small businesses, and you have used that money to fuel a strong and growing economy. Last year, our economy grew faster than any other major industrialized nation. This week, we learned that our economy grew by 1.6 percent during the third quarter of this year. As we expected, this rate is slower than in previous quarters. Yet the evidence still points to a vibrant economy that is providing more jobs and better wages for our workers and helping reduce the federal deficit.
.
So my administration and the Republican Congress enacted the largest tax relief since Ronald Reagan was in the White House. We cut taxes for every American who pays income taxes. We doubled the child tax credit. We reduced the marriage penalty. We cut taxes on small business. We cut taxes on capital gains and dividends to promote investment and jobs. And to reward family businesses and farmers for a lifetime of hard work and savings, we put the death tax on the path to extinction.
.
Now the results of these tax cuts are in. The tax cuts we passed have left more than a trillion dollars in the hands of American workers, families, and small businesses, and you have used that money to fuel a strong and growing economy. Last year, our economy grew faster than any other major industrialized nation. This week, we learned that our economy grew by 1.6 percent during the third quarter of this year. As we expected, this rate is slower than in previous quarters. Yet the evidence still points to a vibrant economy that is providing more jobs and better wages for our workers and helping reduce the federal deficit.
Ah, the deficit- did you know it’s been halved from where it stood several years back? Many people probably don’t, because the mainstream media doesn’t seem to care as much when it goes down as it does when it goes up (and a Republican occupies the White House).

Read more

New Media Rising…

Regular readers may or may not know that Skip and I have another blog, GilfordGrok, where we cover issues relating to our home town, Gilford, NH. Both of us also happen to serve on the town’s Budget Committee (GBC) that passes final judgement on town and school spending proposals the voters ultimately vote upon.
.
GilfordGrok has become yet another source for townsfolk to become informed about the myriad of issues faced by the town as a whole. At the beginning of the budget season, a subcommittee of the GBC conducted a comparative study of salary data between Gilford and 32 similarly sized towns in NH. The executive summary is published on the blogsite, along with approximately 90 tables (!) of supporting data for all who care to see.
.
Given the free-wheeling spirit of the blogosphere, at times you can imagine that the topics and thoughts that get posted can get mighty hot. And they have been. There has been reports of repeated grumbling on the part of those who wish to continue "business as usual" as far as out of control spending goes in our town. Certain elected and bureaucratic persons within the town and school governments have been heard openly complaining about the "stuff that’s up on that website, you know, the ‘Grok thing…"
.
What really irks them is that they no longer have full control of the means to communicate with the citizens. Prior to the advent of the blogosphere, the main source of information for ordinary people was through the carefully filtered (yes, even at the local level) "mainstream media" like newspapers, TV, and to a lesser extent, radio. Now, anybody with a keyboard and a website address can help disseminate news and opinion.
.
Today’s UnionLeader.com carries a story that demonstrates the growing power of blogs in the political arena at the local level. Correspondent Nancy Foster reports:
Milford – In the era of MySpace.com and The Drudge Report, it seems that everybody who’s anybody has a blog. Sending one’s opinions out into the infinite ether of the Internet has become part of daily life, and in Milford, it’s beginning to shape the town’s political landscape.
.

Read more

“Useful Idiots” by Ed Mosca

Our friend Bill A. in Dover forwards attorney Ed Mosca’s latest piece on the education funding boondoggle here in NH. Big spending government types and their liberal adherants can’t stand that NH has the smallest state tax-take in the entire USA. Low taxes = small government. Proponents of a so-called "broadbased" tax (i.e. income, sales) have taken their quest to the unelected judges, naturally. As usual, Ed really nails it:

Useful Idiots by Ed Mosca

Lenin is credited with coining the term “useful idiots,” which he supposedly used to refer to supporters of the Soviet Union living in Western democracies.  They were idiots because they unwittingly were supporting a cause that would destroy the freedoms and prosperity they enjoyed under democratic governments.  When it comes to education funding, the term fits those candidates running for State office who want to define an adequate education “so the Supreme Court doesn’t do it for us.” 
.
Obviously, their line of thinking is predicated on the notion that, if only the Legislature and Governor “finally” were to define an adequate education, the Court would then defer to this definition and the corresponding determination of the cost.  A brief history lesson is in order because, as the saying goes, those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it.   
.
The Court first asserted that the representative branches needed to define an adequate education in Claremont I, which was issued in 1993.  It provided no guidelines for doing so, telling the representative branches that they were free to choose from a “wealth of historical data … spanning more than three hundred years.”
.
Despite over 200 years of history and precedent to the contrary, the representative branches took at face value this absolutely incredible proposition that the words a “duty to cherish public schools” were really code for a “duty to define an adequate education,” and through the State Board of Education defined an adequate education.  And how did the Court respond?  Only four years later, in Claremont II, it ruled the State Board’s definition was unconstitutional, claiming that it did not “sufficiently reflect the letter or spirit of the State Constitution’s mandate.” 
.
What’s more, no longer were the representative branches free to define an adequate education based on a “wealth of historical data.”  Now the constitution required the definition to be based upon seven “aspirational guidelines” articulated in a 1986 decision by the Supreme Court of Kentucky.
.
Rather than asking the obvious question what the aspirations of Kentuckian judges could possibly have to do with the New Hampshire constitution, the Legislature and Governor virtually bent over backwards to comply with Claremont II.  Committees were formed, forums were convened and experts were consulted.  Ultimately, a study prepared by Augenblick & Myers was used to set the cost of an adequate education.

And then what happened? The Claremont plaintiffs immediately returned to court, claiming that the Legislature had not correctly calculated the cost of an adequate education.  Among other things, they claimed that the formula didn’t use the proper assessment tests to gauge student performance and didn’t contain enough money for transportation and capital costs. 

Read more

President’s Radio Address: “Real Consequences”

This week President Bush spoke of North Korea’s apparent detonation of a nuclear bomb. This is, of course, really bad news for the US and the rest of the world- the fact that one of the main members of the "Axis of Evil" now has such a weapon.
.
The president continues to push the "6-party" talks while his detractors want direct negotiations between the US and North Korea. Go figure- Bush, after getting lambasted for "going it alone" in various aspects of the new world war wants six nations (most of which are in the vicinity of the Korean peninsula) involved with the diplomatic efforts, while his political foes encourage a process that excludes all but the US. Thank God President Bush seemingly stays focused on the task at hand, and not his popularity as defined by the opposition…
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. Earlier this week, the government of North Korea proclaimed to the world that it had conducted a successful nuclear weapons test. In response to North Korea’s provocative actions, America is working with our partners in the region and in the United Nations Security Council to ensure that there are serious repercussions for the North Korean regime.
.
North Korea has been pursuing nuclear weapons and defying its international commitments for years. In 1993, North Korea announced that it was withdrawing from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. The United States negotiated with North Korea and reached a bilateral agreement in 1994: North Korea committed to giving up its pursuit of nuclear weapons in exchange for help with peaceful nuclear power.
.
After I came to office, we discovered that North Korea had been violating this agreement for some time by continuing work on a covert nuclear weapons program. My administration confronted the North Korea regime with this evidence in 2002, and the North Koreans subsequently walked away from the 1994 agreement.
.

Read more

McCain: When he’s wrong, he’s wrong. When he’s right, he’s right. Today he’s right.

Anybody that knows me knows that I am generally p-o’d at John McCain for whatever cause he happens to be championing. Whether it’s stifling free speech with campaign finance "reform" or seemingly protecting the "rights" of terrorists, I regard him as more harm than good for many of the issues important to me. Many crusades upon which he embarks appear designed for publicity and to distance himself from policies of the Bush administration.
.
That being said, given the poor polling numbers that continue to dog President Bush, there may be- and it’s a big "may"- some "method to his madness." If large numbers of voters continue to allow themselves to be misled by the President’s detractors (main stream media, Democrats, etc.), the only way for any Republican to be successful in ’08 may be by being the "anti-Bush." Do I like this possibilty? No. In a perfect world, more people would wake up, see the soundness of the present administration’s overall strategy, and choose a candidate running a campaign based upon a continuation.
.
The world is not perfect.
.
McCain isn’t always wrong, either. He scored 2 positive points with me this week. First, he guest blogged at Captain’s Quarters (which, now that I think of it, earns him another point) on the North Korea situation. He did this nation a great service by reiterating the folly of the ’94 Clinton administration deal with the communist regime, helping people to recognize that mistake so that we don’t repeat it.
The worst thing we could do is accede to North Korea’s demand for bilateral talks. When has rewarding North Korea’s bad behavior ever gotten us anything more than worse behavior?
.
I would remind Senator Hillary Clinton and other Democrats critical of Bush Administration policies that the framework agreement her husband’s administration negotiated was a failure. The Koreans received millions in energy assistance. They diverted millions in food assistance to their military. And what did they do? They secretly enriched uranium.
.
Prior to the agreement, every single time the Clinton Administration warned the Koreans not to do something — not to kick out the IAEA inspectors, not to remove the fuel rods from their reactor — they did it. And they were rewarded every single time by the Clinton Administration with further talks. We had a carrots and no sticks policy that only encouraged bad behavior. When one carrot didn’t work, we offered another.
.
This isn’t just about North Korea. Iran is watching this test of the Council’s will, and our decisions will surely influence their response to demands that they cease their nuclear program. Now, we must, at long last, stop reinforcing failure with failure.
Amen! This is "straight talk" of the kind that I only wish was more common. What’s not to understand? What is surprising about this from McCain is that he followed it up with another correct statement on an important issue- the Iraqi front in the war. 

Read more

Notable Quote: Gibbon

Edward Gibbon wrote in his classic "The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" of the eventual dominance of the barbarians over that epoch’s "superpower": Cold, poverty, and a life of danger and fatigue fortify the strength and courage of barbarians. In every age they have oppressed the polite and peaceful nations of China, India, and … Read more

Two quick thoughts…

A couple of quick thoughts for a Columbus Day here in Central NH so beautiful that only God could have made it… . First, the anti- Columbus Day movement in the country mostly comes from the liberal-run public school system. The people in charge of those institutions these days despise Columbus. On the other hand, most … Read more

Diversity Week at URI. “Celebrating the values of diversity & multiculturalism.” Values?

With the oldest offspring in her senior year of high school, the spectre of choosing a college and sending her away from the nest looms large. While I did not attend, I have a number of friends who went to the University of Rhode Island (URI). That, combined with the fact that I am originally from RI, has caused me to maintain an e-scription to the student paper- The Good 5-cent Cigar. Through the years, by reading the paper and watching the events at the school, one can get the sense of which way the pendulum has swung on that campus- back and forth from standard liberal to moonbat leftie. As with most state universities these days, conservative thought and viewpoints need not apply.
.
What caught my eye most recently was an article on that university’s Diversity Week 2006, which led me to the URI Multicultural Center website, noting the event’s ten-year anniversary:
Diversity Week is a full week (September 25-29) with over 60 workshops, presentations, music performances and festivities celebrating the values of diversity and multiculturalism. It offers students and the community at large the opportunity to step outside their familiar zones and into other worlds (without leaving Kingston, RI!!!) . It is supported by over 30 University departments and campus organizations. Each individual event is a treasure but taken together as a whole, the week is truly an amazing tapestry. The fact that Diversity Week is now celebrating its 10th anniversary at URI is a testament to resonance and importance on campus.
Sounds like the standard liberal pap one would find on most college campuses. As usual, the devil is in the details…

Read more

Share to...