While Dan Richard has been fighting in having his NH Constitutional Right to serve a Remonstrance to the NH House and Senate, he has now embarked, on Constitutional grounds again, on the legality of using the 4-decade-old practice of using Dominion’s electronic voting machines over the 200+ year tradition of hand counting.
Remonstrance
Daniel Richard: NH Supreme Court, you got it wrong. Files for Reconsideration
And, after chatting with him a bit ago, is willing to take this to Federal court. I have to laugh because his Motion is the first one that I’ve seen or heard of that can actually use the Claremont “cherish” decision in a positive way. From the top part of the Motion: Now comes the … Read more
Watch Dan Richard’s Excellent Remonstrance (Oral Argument) Before the NH Supreme Court …
GraniteGrok has been publishing Dan’s legal pleas seeing redress of grievance from his elected Representatives – long enough to have traveled several election cycles in which the Speaker of the House and President of the Senate have changed both Parties and names.
Appeal to Supreme Court
NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT Case No. 2021 TERM FALL SESSION DANIEL RICHARD V. SHERMAN PACKARD AND CHUCK MORSE ____________________________________________________________ RULE 7 APPEAL OF FINAL DECISION OF MERRIMACK COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ____________________________________________________________ BRIEF OF APPELLANT By: Daniel Richard 1danielrichard@protonmail.com We want to thank Dan Richard for this update in his case to have both the … Read more
1st Remonstrance in N.H. 1786 – Transcribed
Here is the First Remonstrance, transcribed from parchment paper, filed after the N.H. Constitution went into effect:
Do We Really Have Any Voice?
Do we really have any voice when our government no longer believes it has any constitutional obligation to actually HEAR the people’s grievances in the form of petitions and remonstrances?
Writ of Mandamus – Filed in Merrimack County Court and Served on NH House Speaker Sherm Packard and NH State Senate Chuck Morse
Daniel Richard: “I am forced to do this as they refused to accept my remonstrances.”
To the Honorable General Court Of The State of New Hampshire A Memorial and Remonstrance
Honorable and respected ladies and gentlemen. When a people, led to freedom by the hand of patriotic virtue, entrust the Supreme power of Government in the hands of individuals selected and chosen from among the citizens at large,
The Speaker of the NH House and President of the NH Senate Willfully Ignored the Law – An Update
The Speaker of the House of Representatives, Stephan Shurtleff, and Senate President Donna Soucy have refused to perform their Constitutional duties to provide me with Due Process of Law, and my Right of Redress of Grievance as protected by the New Hampshire Constitution.
Op-Ed: Remonstrance In New Hampshire
The Remonstrance is a Constitutional Right, exercised to protest any encroachment on the rights of the people, or, any usurpations of power by design, or inattention to the Laws of the Land.
Honor your oath: For Whom does the General Court Work?
Does the NH General Court (NH House, NH Senate) only serve the will of the political parties and no longer the will of the people?
A way to force them to “Honor your oath”? A Remonstrance on HB 687-FN (Extreme Protection Orders)
If the voters themselves don’t care, we’re done for. Or at least I thought we were for how else does one hold a politician that refuses to honor their oath? Surprise!”
Spoiler: Remonstrance.