HHS Mandate Suffers Setback

From Caffeinated Thoughts, long time friend of the Grok Shane Vander Hart reports on a court decision in favor of Thomas Monaghan and his property management corporation, which objected to the HHS contraceptive mandate on religious grounds. Judge Zatkoff’s decision protects freedom granted under the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.  Thomas More Law Center, in their press release, … Read more

ObamaCare HHS Mandate – is it safe to say that Obama wishes to discrimate against small colleges?

I’ve started to track those colleges that are having to give up offering healthcare to their students because of Obamacare.  I won’t catch them all, or even a large percentage of them, but I am seeing more notices:

Now add anotherGeneva College (reformatted):

Dr. Ken Smith, president of Geneva College in western Pennsylvania, intends to pay a fine to the federal government rather than comply with the federal government’s mandate that forces institutions to provide abortion-inducing drugs, contraception and sterilization to its employers. The mandate, scheduled to be effective on Aug. 1, could financially penalize institutions for not complying with Department of Health and Human Services demands that blatantly undermine religious freedom. Placed in a challenging situation, this small, Presbyterian, liberal-arts college located in Beaver Falls, PA, will likely be forced to drop health-care insurance altogether, resulting in steep fines.

“We would rather pay the fine than violate our conscience,” Smith said in an interview with Scribe.

That fine is hefty.  Assuming the mandate stands, “There will be a significant financial impact on the college because we cannot be compelled to take action that violates our conscience. If [the fines] are over half a million dollars, we’d have to find a way to absorb that.”

Read more

Guest Post: Chris Crawford – “This mandate is an assault on religious liberty”

Chris Crawford is the Chair of the NH Conservative Future PAC:

Those who support the new Health and Human Services contraception mandate have largely stated that they hold their opinion because they are not a person of faith or because they disagree with the Church’s teachings on contraceptives. As a sophomore at an extremely secular college, I understand both of these arguments. However, both of the arguments miss the larger point: This mandate is an assault on religious liberty. If religious liberty can be assaulted from one side, it can be attacked from the other side as well.

Read more

Share to...