The Sentinel asked why Democrat Dan Eaton, who resigned from the NH House due to ethics charges, why he was running. Well, the guy seems to have a pair (if nothing else): “To restore transparency, civility and fairness to the institution“
Riiiiiiight. If I remember right, he resigned when he became under an investigation of a “lapse in ethics” – does this mean he’ll be “transparent” as to the charges AND why he resigned? And the stories are that he wasn’t all that civil about things, either. So, what IS fairness, Mr. Dan? And why now is a better time for you to be back in the NH House, again, now that you are a “resignee”? A mailer that went out to folks in that area was forwarded to me (note: you HAVE to like the name of the PAC – “the “Do You Know Who I AM” PAC. And that’s his brother, the Chair??):
Well, seems like Dan might have been the bad boy, eh? The PAC goes on to list the Top 5 Reasons To REJECT Dan Eaton for State Representative:
Being as concerned as they are about ethics and corruption (over at the offices of the New Hampshire Democrat Party) you’d think Paul ‘Jersey’ Hodes would have refused that $10,000.00 campaign contribution from Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ).
No one doubts that BP has a responsibility to clean up after themselves but Paul Hodes has taken the opportunity to play word games and politics.